From the tool to the protocol

From the tool to the protocol

One of the most difficult, but interesting, things to spot in the adoption of technology are the protocols and etiquette involved with a particular app. Hence the significance of this article in The Wall Street Journal entitled “The new dating no-no: asking for a last name”, about dating site Tinder.

Tinder is particularly interesting, and I have used it on other occasions, because it is extremely easy to use and understand: as the screenshot above shows, it could hardly be simpler: swipe, match, chat. Images appear on your screen of people interested in dating: you swipe the image to the right or left depending on whether you like them or not, wait for a match to appear, and start chatting. It is one of the simplest interface designs that exist, leading to the neologism tinderization to describe a process of maximum simplification. Anyone, absolutely anyone, can understand Tinder immediately, without any need for explanations.

Behind that simplicity, however, there are any number of more complex factors: the algorithm that decides which profiles to show you and which not, based on the information you’ve provided, which acts not only on what you do, but also based on what everybody else using the app is doing. Each phase of the process is important: your attempts to establish contact that come to nothing, or dates that are broken. Finally, there are the set of protocols, patterns and behaviors that take shape as the application is used: a set of social norms that undoubtedly evolve over time depending on context and customs — imagine what it was like trying to find a partner in the nineteenth century — and that Tinder itself has contributed hugely to, and that are very difficult to grasp. Tinder’s huge cultural impact is evident every time I use it in my classes, and what’s more, I never have to explain what it is. The discussions that follow are always interesting and informative, with comments usually reflecting generational differences.

As the WSJ article notes, one of the fascinating things about Tinder is that people do not give their surnames. Does this design decision condition the fact that, even after a couple of dates, it is still largely regarded as inappropriate to ask somebody’s surname? Obviously, once you know someone’s last name, along with some data easily obtained through conversation, it is possible to find out much more about them through internet searches, which might then impact on the relationship in unpredictable ways. Today, we are what we are, together with what Google says we are. By eliminating surnames from its interface, Tinder leaves it up to you to share your surname, thus deciding if the relationship is to be a series of casual encounters or if it will progress to something more stable.

The important thing about technology in its adoption phases is not the technology itself, but the use protocols it generates, protocols that, in many cases, are driven by design or operational decisions. Tinder is just one example, useful for its extreme simplicity, but the use of such protocols can be identified in many other adoption processes, and are much more important than we tend to assume. Protocols also explain the importance of responsible adoption: the use of technology has been greatly simplified and has eliminated many entry barriers, but this does not necessarily happen with use protocols, so that it is very likely we will misuse an app and make important mistakes that condition our use. The development of protocols is often more important than the technology itself when defining how it is adopted and its impact on society.



(En espa?ol, aquí)

José Luis Mu?oz

MBA | MPA | MSTC | PMP

7 年

Dr. Dans, thank you for sharing your thoughts on this topic. I am a huge fan of Tinder and concur with your assessment that Tinder is shaping social etiquette. In fact, senior leadership at my organization used the term 'speed dating' to describe the way they would like to consume pitch decks from Senior Executives. Jonathan Worms, I would love to hear your thoughts. Hugo Holmes -- Lots of Tinder memories from our time at IE came to mind when I read this article. Looking forward to your comments.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Enrique Dans的更多文章

  • El desastre del software y la automoción

    El desastre del software y la automoción

    GM se ve obligada a detener temporalmente las ventas de su Chevy Blazer EV después de detectar un sinnúmero de…

    11 条评论
  • El enésimo drama de la automoción tradicional: la interfaz

    El enésimo drama de la automoción tradicional: la interfaz

    Porsche acaba de anunciar que se une a toda la legión de empresas de automoción tradicionales y renuncia a tener una…

  • Poniendo a prueba a ChatGPT: consultores centauros o cyborgs

    Poniendo a prueba a ChatGPT: consultores centauros o cyborgs

    Un working paper de Harvard, ?Navigating the jagged technological frontier: field experimental evidence of the effects…

    12 条评论
  • Suscripciones, tramos… y spam

    Suscripciones, tramos… y spam

    Elon Musk confirma sus intenciones de convertir la antigua Twitter, ahora X, en un complejo entramado de suscripciones…

  • El código abierto y sus límites

    El código abierto y sus límites

    Sin duda, el código abierto es la forma más ventajosa de crear software: cuando un proyecto de software toma la forma…

  • La gran expansión china

    La gran expansión china

    El ranking de apps más descargadas en el mundo en iOS y Android para el mes de septiembre de 2023 elaborado por…

    1 条评论
  • Starlink y las torres de telefonía en el espacio

    Starlink y las torres de telefonía en el espacio

    Starlink remodela su página web y a?ade una oferta de internet, voz y datos para smartphones provistos de conectividad…

    3 条评论
  • La fotografía con trampa

    La fotografía con trampa

    La presentación de los nuevos smartphones de Google, Pixel 8 y Pixel 8 Pro, y fundamentalmente de las funcionalidades…

  • Las consecuencias de reprimir los procesos de innovación

    Las consecuencias de reprimir los procesos de innovación

    Mi columna de esta semana en Invertia se titula ?El mercado de trabajo y la innovación? (pdf), y previene sobre los…

  • We are on the verge of the most dangerous election in history

    We are on the verge of the most dangerous election in history

    In just a few days, on November 3rd, the US presidential elections will take place, the most dangerous in history, and…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了