From SQL Mastery to Data Warehouse Woes: Navigating the Complex Transition in Data Architecture
From SQL Mastery to Data Warehouse Woes

From SQL Mastery to Data Warehouse Woes: Navigating the Complex Transition in Data Architecture

In this enlightening newsletter, join me as I unravel the often-underestimated journey from being a seasoned application developer or solution architect to diving into the world of data warehousing and lakehouse architecture.

In today's fast-paced technological landscape, the roles of application developers and data architects have become increasingly complex and demanding. This complexity is vividly portrayed in a scenario many face: a seasoned application developer or solution architect, fluent in SQL and familiar with Python and various data science libraries, is suddenly tasked with building a new data warehouse or lakehouse. It seems like a natural progression, but this transition can be fraught with misconceptions and challenges.

OLTP VS OLAP


The heart of the issue lies in a fundamental misunderstanding of the differences between Online Transaction Processing (OLTP) systems and Online Analytical Processing (OLAP) systems. While the developer's expertise in SQL, functions, procedures, and Common Table Expressions (CTEs) is commendable, it may lead to an overemphasis on OLTP-focused skills during the hiring process. This can result in a team more suited for transactional system design than for the nuances of data warehousing, such as parallel processing, columnar data stores, and effective data handling strategies.

This misalignment often leads to a focus on automating data processing and building metadata-driven validation engines, relying heavily on computing power rather than efficient data storage. While such approaches may initially seem effective, they can lead to significant financial burdens on clients, particularly in cloud-based environments.

An OLTP Architect versus Modern Data Warehouse Architect Dilemma

What is that you feel that you know but still don't know?

Here we will take you through some use cases that can impact you as a transitioning architect.

Highly relying on compute rather than low-cost cloud storage

A prime example of this complexity is evident in a situation frequently faced by many professionals: an experienced application developer or solution architect, proficient in SQL and well-versed in Python and various data science libraries, is assigned the task of building a new data warehouse or lakehouse. While this task appears to be a natural step forward in their career, it brings with it a host of misconceptions and challenges, particularly regarding the use of views and the impact on computing costs.

Excessive View


Real-Life Example of Excessive View-Based Architecture

Consider the case of Emily, a seasoned application developer at a retail company. Emily, skilled in SQL, was tasked with transitioning to a data warehouse project. She decided to heavily rely on SQL views to simplify data access and assumed that this approach would be cost-effective. However, as the data warehouse grew in complexity and size, the reliance on views for every query began to take a toll. Each view execution required significant compute resources, leading to a substantial increase in processing time and costs.

The situation worsened when the company decided to implement real-time analytics. The multiple layers of views became a bottleneck, severely impacting query performance. The increased compute costs quickly surpassed the budget, and the company had to reevaluate its entire data strategy. The excessive use of views, while initially seeming efficient, resulted in a costly miscalculation.

Issues with Compute-Intensive Operations in Cloud Environments

Excessive compute


Another instance is the story of a fintech startup, where Alex, a data architect, designed a data processing system using complex chained views for data transformation and aggregation. While this approach worked initially, as data volumes increased, the compute-intensive nature of processing these views led to skyrocketing costs. In cloud environments, where compute resources are billed based on usage, the cost of continuously running these complex queries became unsustainable. The startup had to urgently redesign its data processing architecture to balance performance and cost, shifting towards a more storage-optimized approach.

Balancing Compute and Storage Costs


Balancing Compute and Storage Costs

These examples highlight a common pitfall in data warehousing: the misunderstanding of the cost implications of compute vs. storage in cloud environments. While cloud blob storage (like AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage) is relatively inexpensive, compute resources (like AWS EC2, Azure VMs) can be costly, especially when used inefficiently. Data architects and developers transitioning to data warehouse roles must understand this balance and design systems that optimize the use of compute resources.
The Double-Edged Sword of Automation


The Double-Edged Sword of Automation in Data Orchestration: A Critical Analysis in the Context of Modern Tools

The percentage of work dedicated to data orchestration in data engineering can vary significantly depending on the specifics of the project, the size and complexity of the data, and the goals of the organization. However, it's generally acknowledged that data orchestration is a substantial and critical component of data engineering.

Data Orchestration and Workflows


Data orchestration involves managing the flow and processing of data from multiple sources to a destination where it can be stored, analyzed, and utilized. This includes tasks like data extraction, transformation, loading (ETL), workflow scheduling, and ensuring data consistency and reliability across different systems.

In many data engineering projects, especially those involving big data, cloud computing, or complex data ecosystems, data orchestration can constitute a significant portion of the workload. Some estimates suggest that data engineers can spend anywhere from 50% to 80% of their time on data preparation and orchestration tasks. This includes writing ETL scripts, setting up data pipelines, ensuring data quality, and managing data flows.

The importance of data orchestration is also increasing with the growing complexity of data environments and the need for real-time data processing and analytics. As such, investing time and resources in efficient data orchestration is crucial for the success of data engineering projects and overall data strategy.


In the realm of data engineering, the automation of data orchestration processes has become a central theme, especially with the advent of powerful tools like Azure Data Factory, Snowflake, Azure Synapse, Azure Data Fabrics, Data Lake, and various multi-cloud SaaS-based tools. While these technologies have revolutionized how we handle data, they also present unique challenges and potential pitfalls.

Data orchestration tools and disambiguation of its understanding


In the field of data engineering, the choice of tools and the degree of automation in data orchestration are critical decisions that can significantly impact the efficiency and success of a project. The trend towards automation, while beneficial in many cases, can also lead to challenges if not implemented thoughtfully. The key lies in striking a balance between leveraging automation and customizing solutions to fit specific business needs. This concept is thoroughly explored in "Architecting Modern Data Warehouse for Large Enterprises," particularly in the context of tool customization and adaptability.

Challenges of Automation in Data Orchestration


Use Cases and Challenges of Automation in Data Orchestration

  1. Over-Automation in a Healthcare Data ProjectUse Case: A healthcare analytics company automated their data ingestion and transformation processes using Azure Data Factory.Issue: The automation was implemented without a deep understanding of the variable nature of healthcare data, which often required specific transformations based on the data source. This led to inaccuracies in the processed data, affecting the analytics outcomes.
  2. Misguided Automation in Retail AnalyticsUse Case: A retail company used a fully automated ETL pipeline to handle their sales data.Issue: The automated system was not configured to handle seasonal variations and promotional data effectively, resulting in data anomalies that were not flagged or corrected in time.
  3. Financial Services CustomizationExample: A financial services firm needed to customize its data processing workflows in Snowflake to comply with regulatory requirements. The out-of-the-box automation did not account for specific audit trails and data retention policies required in the finance sector.
  4. Marketing Data IntegrationExample: A marketing agency using Azure Data Factory found that the standard data connectors did not support some of the niche marketing tools they used. They had to develop custom connectors, ensuring seamless integration of all their data sources.

The Trap of Experience and Expertise in Data Engineering

The Trap of Experience and Expertise


There is a common trap in the world of data engineering: the gap between available tools and the required expertise to effectively use them. Many organizations automate processes using advanced tools without having the right team in place to understand and manage these systems.

  1. Inadequate Team SkillsScenario: A logistics company implemented an automated data orchestration system but lacked staff with the expertise to optimize and maintain it. This led to inefficiencies and frequent system downtimes.
  2. Complexity of Multicloud EnvironmentsScenario: An enterprise adopted a multicloud strategy for data management but struggled with the complexity of orchestrating data across different cloud platforms. Their team was not adequately trained to handle the intricacies of multicloud data integration.

Your Transition from OLTP Architect to Modern Data Warehouse Maestro

Confusions can be handled.
The transition from an Online Transaction Processing (OLTP) architect to a data architect capable of building modern data warehouses is a journey filled with learning and adaptation. As application architects embark on this path, there are several critical areas they must focus on to ensure a successful transition.
Your Transition To the world of Datawarehouse


1. Understanding the Evolution of Data Warehousing

The first step in this journey is understanding the evolution of data warehousing. Data warehousing has come a long way since its inception, evolving through various stages - from traditional warehousing methods to the advent of big data and cloud computing. Application architects must familiarize themselves with the historical context and the key milestones in data warehousing, such as the contributions of pioneers like Bill Inmon and Ralph Kimball. This knowledge provides a solid foundation for understanding current trends and technologies.

2. Grasping the Differences Between OLTP and Data Warehousing

Transitioning architects need to clearly understand the differences between OLTP systems, which they are accustomed to, and data warehousing systems. Unlike OLTP systems that focus on the efficient processing of transactional data, data warehousing systems are designed for the optimal querying and analysis of data. This includes understanding concepts like Online Analytical Processing (OLAP), data modeling, ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes, and data mining.

3. Building Skills in Modern Data Warehousing Technologies

Modern data warehouses are harnessing an array of novel technologies and methodologies. For an OLTP Architect transitioning into this space, it’s crucial to recognize that the SQL skills applied in OLTP systems differ significantly from those required in data engineering.

As these architects evolve, it's imperative to develop expertise in cloud-based data warehousing solutions, aligning them with the unique needs of their clients. This includes understanding the nuances and applications of various architectures, whether it's a straightforward data warehouse, a data lakehouse, data mesh, or data fabric. Equally important is gaining a comprehensive grasp of platforms such as Amazon Redshift, Databricks, Synapse, Azure Fabric, Google BigQuery, and Snowflake, considering their specific features and how they fit into different data strategies.

Familiarity with big data technologies, like Hadoop and Spark, becomes indispensable in this journey. These technologies play a pivotal role in managing and processing large datasets efficiently. In addition, a profound understanding of data orchestration tools and data integration techniques is essential. These skills are not just add-ons but fundamental elements that enable architects to build robust, scalable, and efficient data solutions tailored to their client’s requirements.

4. Recognizing the Importance of Data Quality and Governance

Data quality and governance are critical in data warehousing. Architects transitioning into this field must understand the strategies for ensuring data quality and the frameworks for data governance. This includes mastering data profiling, cleansing, and the implementation of data governance policies and practices.

5. Developing a Team with Complementary Skills

Building a successful data warehousing team requires a mix of skills. Application architects must identify the skills needed in their team, which may include data modelling, data engineering, business intelligence expertise, and cloud computing skills. A robust team should have a blend of skills in data processing, database management, analytics, and machine learning, among others.

They should look for individuals who complement their skill set and can contribute to different aspects of data warehousing.

6. Embracing Continuous Learning and Adaptation

The field of data warehousing and analytics is continuously evolving. Architects must adopt a mindset of continuous learning and be willing to adapt to new technologies and methodologies. This might include staying abreast of advancements in AI and machine learning, which are increasingly being integrated into data warehousing and analytics.

7. Balancing Technical and Business Perspectives

Finally, architects must balance technical expertise with a strong business perspective. This involves understanding the business needs and how data warehousing can meet these needs. It includes aligning data strategies with business objectives and ensuring that the data warehouse provides actionable insights for business decision-making.

8. Cost Management in Data Projects

One of the biggest challenges in data engineering projects is managing costs, especially when dealing with big data and cloud services. It's essential to have a clear understanding of how cloud billing works and how different data processing and storage options can impact costs. Implementing practices like data lifecycle management, choosing the right storage solutions, and optimizing data processing tasks can lead to significant cost savings.

9. Staying Agile and Adaptable

The field of data engineering is dynamic, with new tools and techniques emerging regularly. Staying agile and adaptable is key. This means being open to learning and adopting new technologies and methodologies that can improve efficiency and reduce costs.

10. Prioritizing Data Security and Compliance

With the increasing importance of data in business decision-making, data security and compliance cannot be overstated. Understanding the legal and ethical considerations in data handling, especially in sectors like healthcare and finance, is crucial.

11. Effective Communication with Stakeholders

Finally, effective communication with stakeholders is paramount. This includes translating complex technical concepts into understandable terms for non-technical stakeholders and aligning data strategies with business objectives.

While there are multiple ways to get and master these skills, we have launched a book for a quick upgrade and help in your transition.

Architecting a Modern Data Warehouse by Large Enterprise by Apress

Design and architect new generation cloud-based data warehouses using Azure and AWS. This book provides an in-depth understanding of how to build modern cloud-native data warehouses, as well as their history and evolution.

The book starts by covering foundational data warehouse concepts and introduces modern features such as distributed processing, big data storage, data streaming, and processing data on the cloud. You will gain an understanding of the synergy, relevance, and usage of data warehousing standard practices in the modern world of distributed data processing. The authors walk you through the essential concepts of Data Mesh, Data Lake, Lakehouse, and Delta Lake. They demonstrate the services and offerings available on Azure and AWS that deal with data orchestration, data democratization, data governance, data security, and business intelligence.

After completing this book, you will be ready to design and architect enterprise-grade, cloud-based modern data warehouses using industry best practices and guidelines.

What You Will Learn

  • Understand the core concepts underlying modern data warehouses.
  • Design and build cloud-native data warehouses.
  • Gain a practical approach to architecting and building data warehouses on Azure and AWS
  • Implement modern data warehousing components such as Data Mesh, Data Lake, Delta Lake, and Lakehouse
  • Process data through pandas and evaluate your model’s performance?using metrics such as F1-score, precision, and recall.
  • Apply deep learning to supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised?anomaly detection tasks for tabular datasets and time series applications.

Who This Book Is For

Experienced developers, cloud architects, and technology enthusiasts looking to build cloud-based modern data warehouses using Azure and AWS

About the Authors

The team of authors behind this work are seasoned professionals with a wealth of hands-on experience in data engineering and analytics, playing a pivotal role in the evolution and advancement of data warehousing and analytics technologies. Their expertise shines through in the successful completion of numerous large-scale projects, including the development of data warehouses, data lakehouses, and data mesh frameworks. They have also skillfully integrated these systems with the latest in analytics and AI solutions, showcasing a deep and practical understanding of the industry.

  1. Dr. Abhishek Mishra: Dr. Abhishek Mishra A renowned author and expert in both application and data engineering, Dr. Abhishek has established himself as a leading practitioner in these fields.
  2. Sanjeev Kumar: Sanjeev Kumar Known for leading significant transformations, Sanjeev has a track record of success, particularly highlighted by his work with a global retail firm among other top-tier companies.
  3. Anjani Kumar: Anjani Kumar Boasting a formidable history of spearheading transformative projects in banking and at prominent corporations such as Microsoft, RBS, and Amex, Anjani now leads his data consulting and engineering firm, @multicloud4u. His dedication to fostering innovation and collaboration in the sector is further exemplified by his leadership of an engineering transformation community practice named 5thir, symbolizing his commitment to the 5th Industrial Revolution.

Together, these authors bring a unique blend of theoretical knowledge and real-world experience, making them authoritative voices in the data engineering and analytics space.

Purchase Links

Springer: https://lnkd.in/d7BiE4Ww

Oreilly: https://lnkd.in/dZbgcpCC

Amazon India: https://lnkd.in/dmVeU2Nq

Amazon US: https://lnkd.in/djEdeTqg

Amazon France: https://lnkd.in/dM6xtHXD

Amazon UK: https://lnkd.in/db767pBA




Ani Panda

Digital Transformation Leadership | Data Strategy, Architecture, Engineering, Governance & Integration | Startup Enthusiast | All opinions are my own!

1 年

Yes, OLTP vs. OLAP! Should be easy to comprehend, but, surprising number of folks don't!

Kalyan(Kal) Sambhangi

Technology Strategy I Data & AI | Digital Enablement|Cybersecurity & Resilience | Wharton CTO Alum

1 年

Excellent article Anjani…This is not just an OLTP vs OLAP systems and strategies thing but much so in general where the newer breed (definetly smarter than me but lesser experiential learnings) thinks you just need to throw more cheaper and elastic compute to run the Datawarehouse.. The fundamentals have been the same and solid for atleast the last two decades of database technologies .. thanks for the post and thanks to Mr Inmon and Mr Kimball who taught us the fundamentals.. their approaches were different but still solid for their respective use cases

John O'Gorman

Disambiguation Specialist

1 年

Anjani K. - Perhaps some of the orchestration challenges mentioned in your post can be mitigated by first promoting number 11 in your list: "Effective Communication with Stakeholders" to number 1. Another effective way to address the highly complex and expensive transition from OLTP to OLAP is to realize that the categories used to accomplish the first are always evident in the second. Combining these two principles means addressing the issues 'upstream' of their appearance 'downstream'. Lots of significant savings in time and effort using this approach.

Bill Inmon

Founder, Chairman, CEO, Best-Selling Author, University of Denver & Scalefree Advisory Board Member

1 年

Ranjeet Good read! Bill

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Anjani Kumar的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了