From Regression to Reasoning — A brief Intro & Use Cases by industry verticals
Sanjay Basu PhD
MIT Alumnus|Fellow IETE |AI/Quantum|Executive Leader|Author|5x Patents|Life Member-ACM,AAAI,Futurist
Traditional ML and the Rise of Large Language Models
Today, as I leave SuperComputing 2024, I find ourselves at a fascinating juncture. Traditional machine learning (ML), the backbone of early AI breakthroughs, stands alongside Large Language Models (LLMs), which are undeniably the glittering stars of today’s AI landscape. But while LLMs dazzle us with their ability to generate poetry, write code, and mimic human conversation, traditional ML has quietly remained a workhorse, excelling in areas where flashiness isn’t the goal but precision and efficiency are. The coexistence of these paradigms raises an intriguing question: where does traditional ML shine in the LLM era, and what does the future hold for these trusty algorithms?
Traditional ML encompasses a gamut of algorithms, from linear regression to decision trees, support vector machines (SVMs), and clustering methods like k-means. These models are optimized for structured data, often working wonders in scenarios where relationships between inputs and outputs can be captured succinctly. Need to predict house prices based on square footage and location? Regression has your back. Want to segment customer data for targeted marketing? Clustering delivers. These algorithms excel in environments where interpretability, computational efficiency, and domain-specific tuning are paramount. Unlike LLMs, which gulp down terabytes of unstructured data, traditional ML can thrive on a few well-curated features.
In contrast, LLMs, such as GPT or LLaMA, are built to process and generate unstructured data at scale. They are the Swiss Army knives of AI, performing tasks ranging from sentiment analysis to summarization without requiring much customization for specific use cases. This versatility comes at a cost: LLMs are computationally hungry and notoriously opaque in their decision-making. While you can interrogate a linear regression model to understand how each variable influences the outcome, LLMs often feel like inscrutable black boxes.
Where Traditional ML Shines in an LLM World
Despite the hype surrounding LLMs, traditional ML is far from obsolete. Its strengths lie in structured data processing, real-time decision-making, and low-latency environments. Consider fraud detection in banking: a decision tree or an ensemble method like XGBoost can quickly flag anomalies in transactional data, offering interpretability that auditors demand. Similarly, recommendation engines, logistic regressions, and SVMs are still staples in industries like e-commerce and healthcare, where every millisecond matters.
Traditional ML plays a crucial role in preprocessing and orchestrating workflows for LLMs. Before an LLM can generate a coherent answer or summarize a legal brief, traditional ML algorithms often filter, categorize, or prioritize data. These “routers” and “decision-makers” act as gatekeepers, ensuring the right data gets to the LLM and the outputs are routed to the appropriate downstream tasks.
Incorporating Traditional ML with LLMs
The real magic happens when these paradigms collaborate, especially in agentic workflows. Imagine a customer support system where an LLM generates personalized responses based on user queries. Behind the scenes, traditional ML models classify incoming tickets into categories, rank their urgency, and assign them to the appropriate agents or bots. In this workflow, traditional ML serves as the analytical mind, handling the structured, deterministic tasks, while the LLM brings conversational flair.
Agentic workflows go a step further by introducing reasoning and decision-making loops. Here, we see a blend of hierarchical models, where traditional ML acts as the router, passing contextual information to an LLM that acts as a decision-maker. For instance, in autonomous vehicles, traditional ML models might process sensor data to detect objects, while an LLM-like agent interprets broader contexts — navigating ambiguous instructions like “Find the closest parking spot” in real time.
The Future of Traditional ML
As LLMs evolve, traditional ML isn’t simply standing still, pining for its glory days. Instead, it’s advancing in areas like online learning, federated learning, and edge computing. Algorithms are becoming more adaptive, learning incrementally as new data arrives, and more efficient, thriving in environments where bandwidth and computational resources are limited. In edge AI, where LLMs might be too bulky to deploy, lightweight traditional ML algorithms are indispensable.
Moreover, the principles behind traditional ML — modularity, explainability, and resource efficiency — are influencing how we build and refine LLMs. Techniques like fine-tuning and low-rank adaptation owe much to the foundational work done in feature selection and optimization in traditional ML. In many ways, the progress of traditional ML and LLMs is symbiotic.
The Road Ahead
The future isn’t a zero-sum game where one paradigm outlasts the other. Instead, it’s a collaborative ecosystem where traditional ML and LLMs complement each other’s strengths. As industries like healthcare, finance, and manufacturing adopt agentic workflows, we’ll see increasingly sophisticated interactions between these paradigms. Traditional ML will act as the spine, providing structure, while LLMs, like the nervous system, bring flexibility and responsiveness.
The moral of the story? Don’t count traditional ML out. While LLMs may be the show-stopping protagonists of this era, the steady and reliable algorithms of traditional ML remain indispensable sidekicks, quietly getting the job done with elegance and efficiency. And who knows — perhaps in their collaboration, we’ll find the seeds of the next great leap forward in AI.
Use Cases for Traditional ML and LLMs in Agentic Workflows Across Industry Verticals
The marriage of traditional ML models and Large Language Models (LLMs) within agentic workflows is already proving transformative across a variety of industries. Below are examples from major verticals where these paradigms complement each other to achieve remarkable outcomes.
Healthcare
Use Case: Patient Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations
Finance
Use Case: Fraud Detection and Customer Support
Retail and E-Commerce
Use Case: Personalized Shopping Experiences
Manufacturing
Use Case: Predictive Maintenance and Knowledge Management
Automotive
Use Case: Autonomous Vehicles and Navigation
Energy
Use Case: Smart Grid Management
Life Sciences
Use Case: Drug Discovery and Literature Review
Logistics and Supply Chain
Use Case: Demand Forecasting and Dynamic Scheduling
Entertainment and Media
Use Case: Content Recommendation and Curation
Telecommunications
Use Case: Network Optimization and Customer Service
Education
Use Case: Adaptive Learning Platforms
Government and Public Sector
Use Case: Policy Analysis and Public Communication
Agriculture
Use Case: Precision Farming and Crop Management
As I work with hundreds if not thousands of customers, I try to cultivate common and unique use cases across the industry verticals.