From Paper to Practice - Intended and Enacted Curriculum

You must’ve heard the term "curriculum" in your educational days. It contains all the information about your study for the particular year. But, have you ever wondered if there are any different types of curriculum?

Yes, two types of curriculum serve as a guide for educational institutions. They are called intended and enacted curriculum. In this article, you are going to learn more about these two types and understand their historical significance along with their limitations.?

Definition Of Intended And Enacted Curriculum

Intended Curriculum

The intended curriculum refers to the formal, planned, and documented educational objectives, content, and learning experiences that are designed by educational institutions or curriculum developers. It encompasses the specific knowledge, skills, and competencies that educators and policymakers intend for students to acquire during their educational journey.?

The intended curriculum is typically outlined in curriculum frameworks, standards, and guidelines, and serves as a blueprint for instruction and assessment. It represents the desired educational outcomes and the intended direction for teaching and learning.

Enacted Curriculum

The enacted curriculum, also known as the implemented curriculum, is the curriculum that is actually delivered in the classroom or educational setting. It represents the translation of the intended curriculum into actual instructional practices and experiences.?

The enacted curriculum is influenced by various factors, including the decisions made by teachers, instructional methods employed, available resources, classroom dynamics, and the interactions between teachers and students. It encompasses the instructional strategies, activities, assignments, and assessments that occur within the learning environment.?

The enacted curriculum may align closely with the intended curriculum, but it can also be shaped by contextual factors and adaptations made by educators to meet the needs of their students.

Purpose Of Examining Intended And Enacted Curriculum

Examining the intended and enacted curriculum serves several important purposes in the field of education. These purposes include:

Alignment Assessment

By comparing the intended curriculum with the enacted curriculum, educators and policymakers can evaluate the extent to which the instructional practices and learning experiences align with the intended educational goals and objectives. This assessment helps ensure that what is being taught and learned in the classroom is consistent with the intended outcomes and standards.

Curriculum Evaluation

Analyzing the intended and enacted curriculum allows for a critical evaluation of the effectiveness and relevance of the curriculum design and implementation. It helps identify any gaps, discrepancies, or areas for improvement in the instructional materials, content, teaching strategies, and assessment methods employed.

Accountability And Quality Assurance

The examination of the intended and enacted curriculum plays a vital role in holding educational institutions, curriculum developers, and educators accountable for the quality of education provided. It helps identify whether educational goals and standards are being met and whether adjustments or enhancements are necessary to improve student learning outcomes.

Instructional Improvement

By studying the relationship between the intended and enacted curriculum, educators can identify areas where adjustments or modifications are needed to enhance teaching and learning. This process promotes ongoing reflection and professional development, enabling teachers to refine their instructional practices, incorporate best practices, and better meet the needs of their students.

Equity And Access

Analyzing the intended and enacted curriculum helps identify any inequities or disparities in educational opportunities and outcomes. It enables educators and policymakers to examine whether the curriculum adequately addresses the diverse needs, backgrounds, and abilities of students, and to make necessary adjustments to ensure equitable access to a high-quality education for all learners.

Historical Context And Development Of Intended And Enacted Curriculum

The historical context and development of the intended and enacted curriculum have evolved over time, reflecting changing educational philosophies, societal needs, and pedagogical approaches. Here is an overview of their historical context:

Historical Context

The concept of curriculum has its roots in ancient civilizations, where education focused primarily on transmitting knowledge and skills related to religious, cultural, and societal practices. Over the centuries, the purpose and content of education expanded to include various subjects, such as mathematics, literature, and philosophy.

During the industrial revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries, educational systems began to prioritize standardized and uniform instruction to meet the demands of a rapidly changing society. The development of national educational systems led to the establishment of formal curricula, specifying the knowledge and skills students were expected to acquire.

Development Of Intended Curriculum

In the early 20th century, the development of the intended curriculum gained prominence as educational institutions sought to establish clear learning objectives and outcomes. Influential educational thinkers, such as John Dewey and Ralph Tyler, emphasized the importance of defining educational goals and aligning instructional practices with those goals. This approach aimed to provide a more systematic and organized approach to education.

Curriculum frameworks, standards, and guidelines were developed to outline the intended curriculum, delineating the subject areas, content, and skills that students should learn at each grade level. These documents served as a blueprint for educators and guided instructional planning and assessment.

Development Of Enacted Curriculum

The enacted curriculum gained recognition as educators acknowledged the need to examine the actual implementation of the intended curriculum. In the mid-20th century, educational scholars, such as Philip Jackson and Michael Apple, emphasized the importance of understanding the contextual factors that influence teaching and learning in the classroom.

This shift in focus led to a greater emphasis on the enacted curriculum—the curriculum as it is experienced and practiced by teachers and students. Educators began to recognize that the implementation of the intended curriculum could vary due to factors such as teacher expertise, student diversity, available resources, and classroom dynamics. This recognition highlighted the need to study and evaluate the actual instructional practices, learning experiences, and student outcomes.

Throughout the years, the intended and enacted curricula have continued to evolve in response to educational research, societal changes, and advancements in pedagogical approaches. The focus on aligning the intended and enacted curriculum remains crucial in ensuring educational effectiveness, equity, and continuous improvement in teaching and learning practices.

Comparative Analysis Of Intended And Enacted Curriculum Studies

Impact Of Social Factors On Intended And Enacted Curriculum

Social factors play a significant role in shaping both the intended and enacted curriculum in education. These factors can influence the content, delivery, and outcomes of the curriculum, impacting the educational experiences of students.?

Impact Of Social Factors On Intended Curriculum

Societal Values And Beliefs

The prevailing values, beliefs, and cultural norms within a society influence the selection of subjects, topics, and themes included in the intended curriculum. Societal expectations and priorities shape the emphasis placed on various knowledge areas, such as history, literature, science, or vocational skills.

Political And Policy Influences

Political ideologies, policies, and government regulations can impact the intended curriculum. Educational policymakers and curriculum developers respond to political pressures and societal demands, leading to the inclusion or exclusion of certain content, perspectives, or controversial topics in the curriculum.

Global And Technological Influences

The interconnectedness of the world and rapid advancements in technology have expanded the scope of the intended curriculum. Global awareness, multicultural education, and digital literacy are increasingly incorporated to prepare students for the challenges of a globalized and digital society.

Impact Of Social Factors On Enacted Curriculum

Teacher Beliefs And Practices

Teachers' beliefs, values, and pedagogical approaches significantly influence the enacted curriculum. Teachers make decisions regarding instructional strategies, classroom activities, and assessment methods based on their understanding of student needs, subject matter, and contextual factors.

Student Diversity And Inclusion

Social factors such as cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic diversity within classrooms can impact the enacted curriculum. Teachers must adapt their instructional practices to address the diverse needs and backgrounds of students, ensuring inclusivity and equity in the learning experience.

Community And Local Context

The characteristics and needs of the local community can shape the enacted curriculum. Teachers may incorporate community-based projects, real-world examples, and local resources to connect learning to the students' live experiences, making the curriculum more relevant and meaningful.

Social Issues And Current Events

Social factors, including social issues and current events, can influence the enacted curriculum. Teachers may seize opportunities to address relevant societal challenges, engage students in critical discussions, and promote social awareness and activism through the curriculum.

Research Gaps Related To Intended And Enacted Curriculum

While research on the intended and enacted curriculum has made significant contributions to the field of education, there are still several research gaps that warrant further investigation. Some of the key research gaps related to the intended and enacted curriculum include:

Alignment And Coherence

There is a need for research that explores the extent of alignment and coherence between the intended and enacted curriculum. This involves examining how well the intended curriculum is implemented in practice and identifying the factors that influence alignment or misalignment.

Contextual Factors

More research is needed to understand the influence of contextual factors on the intended and enacted curriculum. This includes investigating the impact of school culture, community characteristics, and socioeconomic factors on curriculum development, implementation, and outcomes.

Teacher Decision-Making

Further research is necessary to gain insights into teachers' decision-making processes when translating the intended curriculum into the enacted curriculum. This includes examining how teachers make instructional choices, adapt the curriculum to meet student needs, and navigate external pressures and constraints.

Curriculum Adaptation

There is a need for research that explores how teachers adapt the intended curriculum to address the diverse needs of students, including culturally and linguistically diverse learners, students with disabilities, and those from marginalized backgrounds. This research can shed light on effective strategies for inclusive curriculum implementation.

Student Perspectives

While research has examined teachers' perspectives on the enacted curriculum, there is a need to include the voices and perspectives of students. Research that explores how students experience and perceive the enacted curriculum can provide valuable insights into their engagement, motivation, and learning outcomes.

Long-Term Impact

Further research is needed to examine the long-term impact of the intended and enacted curriculum on student learning outcomes, including academic achievement, critical thinking skills, and socio-emotional development. Longitudinal studies can help determine the lasting effects of curriculum implementation over time.

By addressing these research gaps, educators, policymakers, and researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the intended and enacted curriculum, leading to evidence-based practices, improved curriculum design and implementation, and enhanced student learning outcomes.

The examination of the enacted and intended curriculum provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics of education. Understanding the relationship between what is planned and what is actually implemented in the classroom is crucial for enhancing educational effectiveness, promoting equity, and fostering continuous improvement.?

Also read: Academic Influence: The Metrics That Matter the Most

Exclusive Scientific Content, Curated By Scientists

If you are a scientist and have no time to write your research paper or create visuals for it, you often get worried about finding the right person or platform that can help you with your work. Mind the Graph is a platform that provides exclusive scientific content, curated by scientists, for you to easily create amazing science designs for publication in journals, blogs and social media. Learn more and sign up for free now.