From Low to High Nickel: The Evolution of Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steels

Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking (ClSCC) in stainless steels is a complex phenomenon influenced by multiple factors, including environmental chemistry, physical conditions such as temperature, and alloy composition. While this article focuses on the role of alloy composition, specifically nickel content, it is essential to acknowledge the synergistic interactions between these variables.

The susceptibility of stainless steels to ClSCC exhibits a non-linear relationship with nickel concentration. Generally, a progressive increase in susceptibility is observed with rising nickel levels up to approximately 13%, culminating in a peak in alloys such as 316 stainless steels. Beyond this point, susceptibility tends to gradually decrease, as exemplified by higher nickel alloys like 310 and 625.

To comprehend the underlying mechanisms governing this behaviour, it is imperative to examine the atomic structure and properties of nickel within the stainless-steel matrix. The interaction between nickel and other alloying elements, such as chromium and molybdenum, also significantly impacts ClSCC resistance. The specific combination of these elements, dictated by the alloy grade and its intended application, influences the overall microstructure and corrosion behaviour of the stainless steel.

By isolating the variable of nickel content and exploring its atomic-level impact, this article aims to provide insights into the fundamental factors contributing to ClSCC susceptibility in stainless steels. However, it is crucial to remember that the practical behaviour of these alloys in real-world environments is a product of the complex interaction between alloy composition and external factors.

The Role of Nickel in Stainless Steel Microstructure

Nickel is a pivotal alloying element in stainless steels, profoundly influencing both microstructure and properties. Its role as an austenite stabiliser is paramount. Austenite, a face-centred cubic crystal structure, imparts stainless steels with desirable characteristics such as ductility, toughness, and resistance to cryogenic temperatures. Nickel's larger atomic radius compared to iron, the base metal, disrupts the tendency towards the body-centred cubic ferrite structure, promoting austenite formation. This stabilisation is further reinforced by nickel's electron configuration, which contributes to a lower stacking fault energy, a metallurgical property favouring the austenitic phase. The larger atomic radius of nickel atoms induces lattice strain when they occupy substitutional positions within the iron lattice. This strain energy acts as an energetic penalty for the formation of the body-centred cubic structure, which is more closely packed than the face-centred cubic structure. Consequently, the system tends to accommodate nickel atoms more readily in the austenitic phase, thereby stabilising it. While a lower stacking fault energy might typically indicate a propensity for defects, in the context of stainless steels, it contributes to overall austenite stability due to complex interactions within the alloy system. Beyond its structural role, nickel enhances the mechanical properties of stainless steels. It contributes to increased strength, especially at elevated temperatures, while maintaining ductility. This combination is essential for applications demanding both load-bearing capacity and formability. Moreover, nickel’s affinity for chromium, another critical alloying element, indirectly bolsters corrosion resistance by facilitating the formation of chromium-rich regions, which are vital for the development of the protective passive film.

The Nickel Content-ClSCC Susceptibility Curve

The relationship between nickel content and chloride stress corrosion cracking (ClSCC) susceptibility in stainless steels follows a non-linear pattern (See the figure below), with susceptibility increasing up to approximately 13% nickel before declining. This behaviour is intricately linked to the evolution of the austenitic lattice structure and the interplay of atomic-level factors as nickel content increases.

At lower nickel concentrations, the gradual increase in susceptibility is primarily attributed to progressive lattice distortion induced by nickel atoms. As nickel substitutes for iron within the face-centred cubic lattice, the lattice parameter expands. The lattice parameter, representing the length of the unit cell edge, significantly influences atomic spacing and interatomic interactions. While pure austenitic iron establishes the initial lattice parameter based on iron's atomic radius, the introduction of nickel, with its larger atomic radius, distorts the lattice.

This expansion is not uniform, leading to localised regions of tensile strain. The extent of these distortions increases with rising nickel content, culminating in a higher density of stress concentrations within the microstructure. These stress concentrations act as preferential sites for the initiation of microstructural defects, such as dislocations and vacancies. These defects, in turn, facilitate the diffusion of aggressive chloride ions and the subsequent initiation of localised corrosion processes that underpin ClSCC.

The lattice parameter configuration at nickel concentrations below 13% is characterised by a relatively homogeneous distribution of lattice strain. However, as nickel content approaches this threshold, the nature of lattice distortion begins to change. The increasing number of nickel atoms in the lattice leads to a more complex pattern of strain, with the formation of localised regions of higher strain. These regions, often associated with clusters or short-range ordering of nickel atoms, create conditions that are particularly conducive to the initiation of ClSCC.

Therefore, the rise in ClSCC susceptibility up to 13% nickel is primarily a consequence of the increasing severity and complexity of lattice distortions induced by nickel. The interplay between lattice parameter expansion, leading to stress concentration, and the subsequent formation of microstructural defects is a primary factor governing ClSCC susceptibility in these alloys.

Beyond the 13% nickel threshold, the factors influencing chloride stress corrosion cracking (ClSCC) susceptibility undergo a transformation. As nickel content rises, a delicate balance of alloy composition becomes crucial for maintaining optimal microstructure and mechanical properties. Strategic additions of chromium and molybdenum enhance passive film stability, a primary defence against ClSCC. This is exemplified by 310 stainless steels, where approximately 25% nickel and chromium content significantly bolsters passive film formation and cohesion. Concurrently, lattice parameter expansion, induced by increased nickel, potentially mitigates susceptibility to stress-induced defects. However, the exact correlation between lattice parameters and ClSCC resistance is complex. It is postulated that excessive lattice distortion, prevalent at lower nickel concentrations, can create stress concentrations contributing to crack initiation. Conversely, an overly contracted lattice might also induce material degradation. Therefore, achieving an optimal lattice parameter is crucial for overall corrosion resistance, including minimizing ClSCC susceptibility.

Moreover, the properties of the austenite phase itself evolve with increasing nickel content. Factors such as lattice parameter expansion, alterations in stacking fault energy, and the influence of other alloying elements contribute to the stability and characteristics of the austenite structure in these high-nickel alloys.

To exemplify the behaviour of high-nickel alloys and their enhanced ClSCC resistance, Alloy 625 serves as a compelling case study. With approximately 62% nickel content, this alloy exhibits exceptional resistance to ClSCC. The ultra-high nickel content significantly stabilizes the austenitic phase, leading to a more robust and defect-tolerant microstructure.

The predominance of nickel atoms in the austenitic lattice of Alloy 625 fundamentally alters its characteristics. Compared to lower nickel alloys, the lattice parameter is considerably expanded, accommodating the larger nickel atoms. This expansion results in increased interatomic spacing within the crystal lattice. The larger distance between atoms reduces the likelihood of atomic-level distortions caused by thermal vibrations or applied stresses. Consequently, the formation of stress concentrations and lattice defects, which can act as nucleation sites for corrosion, is less probable.

Furthermore, the increased lattice spacing can influence the behaviour of point defects (vacancies and interstitials). While counterintuitive, the larger spacing can enhance the mobility of these defects, facilitating their recombination and annihilation. This reduction in point defect concentration contributes to overall material stability. Additionally, the wider lattice spacing might affect dislocation behaviour, though further research is needed to fully elucidate this relationship.

Moreover, the high nickel content in Alloy 625 facilitates extensive solid solution strengthening, where nickel atoms occupy substitutional positions within the iron lattice. This process hinders dislocation motion and improves the overall mechanical properties and resistance to crack propagation. The combined effects of lattice parameter expansion, solid solution strengthening, and the stabilized austenitic microstructure contribute to Alloy 625's exceptional resistance to ClSCC.

Beyond passive film enhancement, the overall resistance to ClSCC in higher nickel alloys is influenced by a combination of factors. Solid solution strengthening, arising from increased nickel and other alloying elements, impedes dislocation motion, thereby improving resistance to crack propagation. Microstructural features, including grain size, precipitate distribution, and defect density, also play a role, though their direct correlation to nickel content is less defined. Additionally, while the impact remains debated, stacking fault energy could potentially influence crack initiation and propagation.

The interplay between lattice parameters, passive film stability, solid solution strengthening, microstructural features, and potential stacking fault energy contributions collectively underpins the enhanced ClSCC resistance observed in high-nickel alloys.

The Impact of Other Alloying Elements

Chromium is fundamental for passive film formation, while molybdenum enhances pitting resistance and indirectly benefits ClSCC resistance. The balance between these elements is critical. For instance, high molybdenum content can mitigate some adverse effects of higher nickel levels, while insufficient chromium can undermine the positive impact of nickel on passive film stability. The intricate interplay between nickel and other alloying elements underscores the complexity of alloy design for optimal ClSCC resistance.

Conclusion

The relationship between nickel content and ClSCC susceptibility in stainless steels is a result of competing metallurgical factors. While nickel can introduce lattice distortions that promote crack initiation, its ability to enhance chromium enrichment and passive film stability ultimately determines the overall ClSCC resistance. Understanding these complex interactions is crucial for the selection and design of stainless steels in chloride-containing environments. The increasing nickel content in stainless steels leads to a complex interplay of factors affecting ClSCC susceptibility. While chromium and passive film formation play a dominant role, the evolution of the austenite phase, lattice parameter variations, and other microstructural aspects also contribute to the overall corrosion resistance of these alloys.

?

?

?