FROM INPUTS TO OUTCOMES: HOW RESULTS BASED BUDGETING CAN IMPROVE ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE

INTRODUCTION

Results Based Budgeting (RBB) is a budgeting approach that aligns financial resources with an organisation's strategic goals and objectives. It involves allocating funds based on the expected results or outcomes of programmes and activities, rather than simply allocating funds based on historical spending or input-based metrics.

The basic steps of RBB include:

1. Identifying strategic goals and objectives: Organisations begin by defining their strategic priorities and the outcomes they hope to achieve.
2. Identifying programmes and activities: Organisations then identify the programmes and activities that will help them achieve their strategic goals and objectives.
3. Developing performance measures: Performance measures are established to track progress towards achieving the identified outcomes.
4. Developing cost estimates: Cost estimates are developed for each programme or activity based on the resources needed to achieve the desired outcomes.
5. Prioritizing programmes and activities: Programmes and activities are prioritized based on their expected results and costs, and funding is allocated accordingly.
6. Monitoring and evaluation: Regular monitoring and evaluation is conducted to assess progress towards achieving outcomes and to identify areas for improvement.

RBB encourages organisations to focus on outcomes and to allocate resources based on the expected results of their programmes and activities. This approach can help organisations to make more informed budget decisions, improve performance, and increase accountability to stakeholders.

QUESTIONS ADDRESSED BY RBB

The RBB approach seeks to address several key questions to ensure that financial resources are allocated effectively and efficiently to achieve desired outcomes. Some of the key questions that RBB seeks to address include:

1. What are the organisation's strategic goals and objectives, and how can the budget be aligned with these priorities?
2. What programmes, projects, outputs and activities are most effective in achieving the desired outcomes, and how much should be allocated to each?
3. What are the expected results or outcomes of each programme or project, and how will success be measured?
4. What is the cost of achieving the desired outcomes, and how can resources be allocated to maximize impact and efficiency?
5. How will the organisation monitor and evaluate progress towards achieving outcomes, and how will this information be used to inform future budget decisions?
6. Are there any trade-offs or prioritization decisions that need to be made to ensure that resources are allocated to the programmes and activities that will have the greatest impact?

These questions help organisations to take a more strategic and outcome-focused approach to budgeting, rather than simply allocating funds based on historical spending or input-based metrics. By addressing these questions, organisations can improve the effectiveness and efficiency of their budgeting processes and drive better performance and results.

ORIGINS, EVOLUTION AND MULTI-SECTORAL APPLICATION OF RBB

RBB has its origins in the broader movement towards Results Based Management (RBM) and Performance Based Budgeting (PBB) that emerged in the late 20th century. The origins of RBB can be traced back to the 1990s, when there was increasing recognition of the need for more effective and efficient use of public resources, as well as greater accountability and transparency in government spending.

The concept of RBB was first introduced in the development aid community, where donors and international organisations sought to shift the focus of budgeting from inputs and activities to outcomes and results. This approach was motivated by a desire to improve the effectiveness of aid programmes and ensure that resources were being used to achieve specific development objectives.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the concept of RBB began to gain traction in national governments around the world, particularly in developed countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand. These countries recognized that traditional budgeting approaches were not always effective in achieving desired outcomes, and they sought to adopt a more strategic and results-focused approach to budgeting.

Since then, RBB has continued to evolve and gain popularity around the world, with many governments and organisations adopting elements of this approach to improve the effectiveness of their budgeting processes. While the specific implementation of RBB can vary across contexts, the underlying principles of aligning resources with strategic priorities and focusing on outcomes and results remain central to this approach.

In the private sector, RBB can help companies to allocate resources more effectively to achieve their strategic goals, such as increasing sales, improving customer satisfaction, or reducing costs. For example, a company might identify a target for increasing sales in a particular market and then allocate resources to activities and programmes that are expected to achieve that outcome, rather than simply allocating funds based on historical spending or input-based metrics.

RBB can also help private sector companies to improve their decision-making by providing a more objective and analytical approach to budgeting. By focusing on outcomes and results, companies can identify which programmes and activities are most effective and allocate resources accordingly, leading to better performance and improved results.

THE NEXUS BETWEEN RBB AND RESULTS BASED STRATEGIC PLANNING (RBSP)

Results-Based Budgeting (RBB) is closely linked to Results Based Strategic Planning (RBSP), and the two approaches are often used together to achieve a more comprehensive and effective planning and budgeting process. Here are a few reasons why RBB and Results-Based Strategic Planning are linked.

a)????? Common focus on outcomes

Both RBB and RBPS focus on achieving specific outcomes or results. By aligning budgeting decisions with strategic priorities and focusing on outcomes, RBB supports the achievement of the goals and objectives identified in the RBSP process.

b)????? Mutually reinforcing processes

The process of RBPSP helps to identify the outcomes that are most important for an organisation to achieve, while RBB provides a mechanism for allocating resources to achieve those outcomes. Together, these processes create a more comprehensive and coherent approach to planning and budgeting.

c)?????? Improved decision-making

Both RBB and RBSP provide a more analytical and evidence-based approach to decision-making, which can lead to better performance and outcomes. By focusing on outcomes, these approaches help organisations to prioritize their efforts and allocate resources to the programmes and activities that are most likely to achieve their strategic goals.

d)????? Greater accountability and transparency

RBB and RBSP both emphasize accountability and transparency, as they require organisations to define clear outcomes and measures of success, and to track progress towards achieving those outcomes. This can help to improve accountability to stakeholders and promote more effective use of resources.

In practice, RBSP typically informs RBB. Here are a few reasons why:

e)????? Strategy informs budget

The process of RBSP typically precedes the budgeting process and involves identifying the organisation's strategic priorities and determining the outcomes that need to be achieved to support those priorities. This provides a foundation for the budgeting process and helps to ensure that the budget is aligned with the organisation's overall strategy.

f)?????? Outcomes drive budget decisions

RBB focuses on allocating resources based on the expected outcomes of programmes and activities, which requires a clear understanding of the outcomes that the organisation is trying to achieve. The outcomes identified in the RBSP process provide this necessary context and help to guide budget decisions.

g)????? Strategy sets the direction

RBSP provides a long-term perspective on the organisation's direction and priorities, while Results-Based Budgeting focuses on the allocation of resources in the short-term. As such, RBSP sets the overall direction and provides a framework for budgeting decisions, while RBB operationalizes the strategy by allocating resources to achieve specific outcomes.

h)????? Alignment and coherence

Together, RBSP and RBB create a more coherent and aligned approach to planning and budgeting. By linking the organisation's strategy, outcomes, and resource allocation, these approaches help to ensure that the organisation is working towards its strategic goals and using its resources effectively.

THE LINK BETWEEN RBB AND ANNUAL PLANNING

RBB is closely linked to the annual planning process, and the two approaches are often integrated to create a more effective and strategic approach to budgeting. Here are a few ways in which RBB and annual planning are linked:

a)????? Annual plans inform budget decisions

Annual planning typically involves setting priorities and goals for the upcoming year, identifying the activities and programmes that will be necessary to achieve those goals, and developing a plan for allocating resources to support those activities. This process provides essential input into the budgeting process, helping to ensure that the budget is aligned with the organisation's annual plan and priorities.

b)????? Budgets support annual plans

RBB is a tool for allocating resources to achieve specific outcomes, which makes it well suited for supporting the implementation of annual plans. By aligning the budget with the annual plan, organisations can ensure that they are allocating resources to the programmes and activities that will have the greatest impact in achieving their goals.

c)?????? Alignment and coherence

Integrating RBB into the annual planning process helps to create a more coherent and aligned approach to planning and budgeting. By linking the organisation's priorities, activities, and resource allocation, these approaches help to ensure that the organisation is working towards its goals in a strategic and effective manner.

d)????? Ongoing cycle of planning and budgeting

Finally, it is worth noting that the link between RBB and annual planning is part of an ongoing cycle of planning and budgeting. As organisations implement their annual plans and track their progress, they can use this information to inform future planning and budgeting decisions, creating a continuous feedback loop that supports ongoing improvement and adaptation.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RBB AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E)

RBB and Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are closely related and complementary approaches that are often used together to support effective decision-making and improvement in organisations. Here are a few ways in which RBB and M&E are related:

a)????? Common focus on outcomes

Both RBB and M&E focus on outcomes, or the results of programmes and activities. RBB uses outcomes to guide budgeting decisions, while M&E uses outcomes to assess the effectiveness of programmes and activities and to identify areas for improvement.

b)????? Data-driven decision-making

RBB relies on data and evidence to inform budgeting decisions, while M&E generates data and evidence through monitoring and evaluation activities. Together, these approaches provide a powerful tool for data-driven decision-making, allowing organisations to allocate resources based on evidence of what works and what does not.

c)?????? Continuous improvement

Results-Based Budgeting and M&E are both tools for continuous improvement. By aligning budgets with outcomes and using data to assess performance, organisations can identify areas for improvement and adjust their strategies and resource allocations accordingly.

d)????? Accountability and transparency

Finally, both RBB and M&E promote accountability and transparency by providing a clear and evidence-based approach to decision-making. This can help to build trust and credibility with stakeholders, as well as support more effective use of resources.

In summary, RBB and M& E are closely related and mutually supportive approaches that can help organisations to make decisions that are more informed, improve performance, and achieve their goals.

RESULTS BASED BUDGETING AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND APPRAISAL

RBB can inform Performance Management and Appraisal across all workforce levels by providing a clear link between individual performance and organisational outcomes. Here are a few specific ways in which RBB can inform Performance Management and Appraisal:

a)????? Outcome-based performance metrics

Results-Based Budgeting identifies the outcomes that are most important for an organisation to achieve, and these outcomes can be used to develop outcome-based performance metrics for individuals and teams. By aligning performance metrics with organisational outcomes, RBB can provide a clear and objective basis for assessing individual performance.

b)????? Data-driven decision-making

Results-Based Budgeting relies on data and evidence to inform budgeting decisions, and this same data can be used to inform Performance Management and Appraisal. By using data to assess individual performance and identify areas for improvement, organisations can support more objective and data-driven decision-making in Performance Management and Appraisal.

c)?????? Alignment with strategic priorities

RBB helps to ensure that resources are allocated to programmes and activities that support the organisation's strategic priorities. By aligning Performance Management and Appraisal with these same priorities, organisations can create a more coherent and aligned approach to managing performance across the workforce.

d)????? Continuous improvement

Finally, RBB supports continuous improvement by providing a mechanism for adjusting resource allocations based on performance. In a similar way, Performance Management and Appraisal can be used to identify areas for improvement and support ongoing development and growth for individuals across the workforce.

In summary, RBB can inform Performance Management and Appraisal across all workforce levels by providing a clear link between individual performance and organisational outcomes, supporting data-driven decision-making, aligning with strategic priorities, and promoting continuous improvement.

RESULTS BASED FINANCING AND RESULTS BASED BUDGETING

Results-Based Financing (RBF) and Results-Based Budgeting (RBB) are complementary approaches that can be used together to achieve better outcomes. Here are a couple of case studies that illustrate the relationship between RBF and RBB:

Healthcare in Rwanda

In Rwanda, a Results-Based Financing scheme was introduced in 2011 to improve maternal and child health outcomes. Under this scheme, health facilities received performance-based financing based on their achievement of specific health indicators, such as the number of women receiving antenatal care or children receiving vaccinations.

To support this approach, Rwanda also implemented Results-Based Budgeting, which helped to ensure that resources were allocated to health programmemes and activities that were most effective in achieving the desired outcomes. This included allocating more resources to health facilities that were achieving better results under the RBF scheme, and redirecting resources away from programmes that were less effective.

Together, these approaches helped to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare spending in Rwanda, and contributed to significant improvements in maternal and child health outcomes.

Education in Colombia

In Colombia, a Results-Based Financing programme was introduced in 2009 to improve student-learning outcomes. Under this programme, schools received additional funding based on their students' performance on national assessments.

To support this approach, Colombia also implemented Results-Based Budgeting, which helped to ensure that resources were allocated to education programmes and activities that were most effective in improving student learning. This included allocating more resources to schools that were achieving better results under the RBF scheme, and redirecting resources away from programmes that were less effective.

Together, these approaches helped to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of education spending in Colombia, and contributed to improvements in student learning outcomes.

These case studies illustrate how Results-Based Financing and Results-Based Budgeting can be used together to achieve better outcomes in different sectors. By aligning financing and budgeting decisions with evidence of what works, these approaches can help to ensure that resources are used effectively and efficiently to achieve desired results.

?

EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL RBB CASES

There are several examples of successful implementation of Results-Based Budgeting (RBB) in Africa and around the globe, and several common factors have contributed to their success. Here are a few examples:

Rwanda

Rwanda implemented RBB in 2013 as part of a broader public sector reform programme. The country has seen significant improvements in service delivery and fiscal management as a result of RBB, including increased accountability, improved budget execution, and better alignment of resources with priorities.

Ghana

Ghana adopted RBB in 2016, and has since seen improved budget credibility, increased investment in priority areas, and greater alignment between budget allocations and strategic priorities. The country has also seen improvements in monitoring and evaluation, with increased use of performance data to inform budget decisions.

Colombia

Colombia has been a pioneer in RBB, implementing the approach in the 1990s. The country has seen increased investment in priority areas, improved performance of government programmes, and greater transparency and accountability in budget decision-making.

New Zealand

New Zealand has a long history of using RBB, and has seen improved service delivery, increased efficiency and effectiveness of government programmes, and greater alignment of resources with strategic priorities. The country has also seen increased public engagement and participation in the budget process.

Common factors for success

Several common factors have contributed to the successful implementation of RBB in these countries, including: strong political commitment and leadership, a clear results framework, robust monitoring and evaluation systems, capacity building and training, and ongoing evaluation and adaptation.

Overall, RBB has proven to be an effective tool for improving budget decision-making and driving better outcomes, and the success of these countries provides valuable lessons and inspiration for others looking to adopt this approach.

CASES OF RBB FAILURE

There have been instances of RBB failure in Africa and around the world. While there are many factors that can contribute to the failure of RBB implementation, a few common themes can be identified in these cases:

• Lack of political commitment and leadership: Without strong support from political leaders, RBB implementation can falter and lose momentum.
• Inadequate capacity and training: Implementing RBB requires significant investment in capacity building and training, and a lack of these resources can lead to failure.
• Weak monitoring and evaluation systems: Without robust monitoring and evaluation systems in place, it can be difficult to assess the effectiveness of RBB and make necessary adjustments.
• Corruption and mismanagement: RBB can be vulnerable to corruption and mismanagement, particularly if accountability and transparency measures are not in place.

Some examples of RBB failure include the delays and cost overruns of Berlin's new airport, corruption scandals in Kenya's infrastructure projects, and inadequate environmental protection in some biodiversity lawsuits. The government of Zimbabwe has struggled to implement RBB despite its rhetorical support for the approach. Some of the potential reasons include:

• Lack of political will and commitment: Despite rhetorical support, the political leadership lacks the will and commitment necessary to drive RBB implementation.
• Bureaucratic resistance: The civil service resists RBB implementation due to concerns about loss of control and fear of change.
• Lack of capacity and resources: Zimbabwe lacks the necessary capacity and resources to implement RBB effectively, including insufficient financial resources, currency volatility, skilled personnel, training, and IT systems.
• Inadequate monitoring and evaluation: Zimbabwe struggles with monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of RBB, leading to an inability to adjust and improve over time.

In addition, Zimbabwe has faced significant economic and political challenges over the past decade, which may have contributed to the difficulties in implementing RBB. Despite these challenges, however, the potential benefits of RBB remain significant, and there may be opportunities for the government to build on its previous efforts and make progress in implementing RBB over time.

?

?

Notwithstanding these failures, however, RBB remains a valuable tool for improving budgeting and decision-making, and lessons can be learned from these examples to improve future RBB implementation.

CONCLUSION

Results-Based Budgeting (RBB) is an innovative budgeting approach that offers significant benefits for governments and organisations looking to improve their decision-making and performance. By focusing on outcomes and allocating resources based on evidence of what works, RBB can help to ensure that financial resources are being used effectively and efficiently to achieve desired results.

Despite its potential benefits, however, RBB is not without its challenges, and successful implementation requires careful planning, strong leadership and commitment, adequate capacity and resources, and robust monitoring and evaluation systems. While there have been instances of RBB failure in some countries, including Zimbabwe, lessons can be learned from these experiences to improve future implementation efforts.

Overall, the promise of RBB remains significant, and governments and organisations should consider adopting this approach as part of a broader effort to improve budgeting and decision-making, drive better outcomes, and achieve greater accountability and transparency. With the right approach and commitment, RBB can be a powerful tool for achieving these goals.

REFERENCES

1. "Results-Based Budgeting: Concepts and Experiences" by Allen Schick and Mary Anderson, Brookings Institution Press, 2000.
2. "Implementing Results-Based Budgeting in Government: Lessons from International Experience" by Sanjeev Gupta, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
3. "The Promise and Performance of Results-Based Budgeting in Developing Countries" by Rachael M. Cronin and Sanjeev Gupta, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5431, 2010.
4. "Assessing the Impact of Results-Based Budgeting: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Uganda" by Rachael M. Cronin, World Bank Economic Review, Volume 28, Issue 2, 2014.

5.?????? "Results-Based Budgeting in the United Nations: The Experience of the United Nations Development Programme" by Robert N. Gee, United Nations, 2004.

1. "Evaluation of Results-Based Budgeting in Peacekeeping Operations" by Alvaro Mendez, United Nations Joint Inspection Unit, 2015.
2. "Implementing Results-Based Budget Management Reforms: Lessons from Six Countries" by Asian Development Bank, 2016.
3. "Results-Based Management in the United Nations Development System: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead" by Ha-Joon Chang and Sanjay Reddy, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2012.

About the writer

Rwakurumbira Munyaradzi is an experienced Management Consultant with 16+ years of experience in various sectors, specializing in Results-Based Management (RBM), Strategic Planning, Leadership Development and Coaching, Teambuilding, Organisational Design and Governance, Change Management, Problem Solving, Stakeholder Engagement, Communication, Data Analysis, Visualization, and Presentation. Holds an MPhil in Development Policy and Practice, and various certifications in Governance, Leadership, and Organisational Development. Possesses a deep understanding of the challenges and opportunities in Organisational and Human Capital Development, and is skilled at navigating complex, multi-stakeholder environments. Expertise in designing and delivering customized training programmes, and in using data and evaluation to inform decision-making and support ongoing performance improvement.

Should you need his services to implement or build organisational capacity in RBB, please contact him via: email: [email protected]? or call +263773487108

?