My journey through the world of Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly ChatGPT, began with curiosity and transformed into a strategic tool for enhancing my cybersecurity expertise. This transition wasn't just about learning the 'how' but also understanding the 'why' and 'what' that can be achieved through these advanced AI models. In partnership with LLMs like ChatGPT, I've not only expanded my knowledge but also drastically boosted my productivity, particularly in curating written content.
Discovering ChatGPT: The Why, How, and What
Initially, ChatGPT was a name that popped up repeatedly in AI discussions. Intrigued by its capabilities, I dove into understanding why it's considered a revolutionary tool. ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, functions on a sophisticated model trained on a diverse dataset encompassing a wide range of internet text. Its ability to generate human-like text responses makes it an invaluable tool for numerous applications, including cybersecurity.
How does ChatGPT work? At its core, ChatGPT processes and generates text based on patterns it has learned during training. It understands context, follows instructions, and can engage in detailed discussions, making it an ideal assistant for developing educational content.
What can ChatGPT do? The possibilities are extensive. From drafting emails to generating educational content, curating a course content from slide decks to scripts for recording, and even scripting for virtual cybersecurity simulations, ChatGPT can do it all with remarkable efficiency and accuracy, provided you know exactly what and how to instruct it.
Engaging ChatGPT: From Questions to Commands
The real magic began when I started interacting with ChatGPT. Initially, my interactions were basic—asking questions to gauge its understanding of cybersecurity. However, I quickly realized that I could leverage ChatGPT not just for answers but also for content creation. This realization was pivotal; I began instructing ChatGPT to draft sections of cybersecurity courses, create quizzes, and even simulate hacking scenarios for training purposes.
For example, while developing a module on network security vulnerabilities for an EC-Council course, I asked ChatGPT to outline the major threats of 2023, their implications, and mitigation strategies. The model not only provided comprehensive information but also formatted it into a structured lesson plan, complete with learning objectives and key takeaways. I did multiple rounds of refinement to contextualize it with case studies that reflect real-world situations.
Productivity Skyrockets: Curating NIST SP 800-53 Course Content
The impact of integrating ChatGPT into my course development process was immediate and profound. What previously took weeks now took days, thanks to ChatGPT's ability to quickly synthesize information and convert it into well-organized educational material. My productivity in designing course content shot up, allowing me to focus more on interactive and practical components of cybersecurity training.
For instance, while working on a new NIST SP 800-53 course, I tasked ChatGPT with creating a comprehensive background guide on control families and their applications. The model executed the task with such precision that it significantly reduced the time I spent on research and allowed me to immediately proceed to the application-based sections of the course. You need refinement and specifics on domain specializations as at times and LLM can be understood as Master of Laws (LL.M) instead of Large Language model. Having said that it might give you details of both Large Language model and Master of Laws.
Learning the Basics: Growth School's way
Growth School first session tinker the world of LLM comparison theory, which sparked the avenue of doing some comparative study on exploring potential, application, architecture and learning resource to exploit strength of these models. I decide to read about them partnering with my old friend ChatGPT. Using ChatGPT, I was able to read and synthesize information from 50 research papers on LLMs in under an hour, enabling me to write this article.
Here is a detailed table of the top 50 LLMs, along with their supported use cases, capabilities, and learning resources:
GPT-4
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 100+ billion parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, translation
- Strengths: Versatility, language understanding
- Learning Resources: OpenAI GPT-4 Paper
BERT
- Architecture: Bidirectional Transformer
- Size: 110M (base), 340M (large) parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Sentiment analysis, text classification, Q&A
- Strengths: Contextual understanding
- Learning Resources: BERT Paper
T5
- Architecture: Text-to-Text Transformer
- Size: 60M to 11B parameters
- Training Data: C4
- Applications: Translation, summarization, text generation
- Strengths: Text-to-text framework
- Learning Resources: T5 Paper
XLNet
- Architecture: Transformer-XL, Permutation-based
- Size: 110M to 340M parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia, Giga5, ClueWeb 09, Common Crawl
- Applications: Language modeling, text generation
- Strengths: Autoregressive, handles context better
- Learning Resources: XLNet Paper
RoBERTa
- Architecture: Robustly optimized BERT
- Size: 125M (base), 355M (large) parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia, CC-News, OpenWebText, Stories
- Applications: Sentiment analysis, text classification, Q&A
- Strengths: Improved pre-training robustness
- Learning Resources: RoBERTa Paper
BLOOM
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 176B parameters
- Training Data: Multilingual web and literature data
- Applications: Text generation, translation, summarization
- Strengths: Multilingual capabilities
- Learning Resources: BLOOM Paper
GPT-3
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 175B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, translation
- Strengths: Versatility, language understanding
- Learning Resources: OpenAI GPT-3 Paper
BART
- Architecture: Transformer (Seq2Seq)
- Size: 400M parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Text generation, summarization, translation
- Strengths: Encoder-decoder architecture
- Learning Resources: BART Paper
Albert
- Architecture: Lite BERT
- Size: 12M (base), 18M (large) parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Sentiment analysis, text classification, Q&A
- Strengths: Parameter efficiency
- Learning Resources: Albert Paper
Megatron
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 8.3B parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, CC-News, OpenWebText, Stories
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, summarization
- Strengths: Scalability, parallelism
- Learning Resources: Megatron Paper
Electra
- Architecture: Discriminator-Generator
- Size: 14M (small), 110M (base), 335M (large) parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Sentiment analysis, text classification, Q&A
- Strengths: Efficient pre-training
- Learning Resources: Electra Paper
Reformer
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 330M parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, translation
- Strengths: Memory efficiency, scalability
- Learning Resources: Reformer Paper
CTRL
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 1.63B parameters
- Training Data: Wikipedia, BooksCorpus, Common Crawl, and more
- Applications: Controllable text generation
- Strengths: Content control
- Learning Resources: CTRL Paper
DistilBERT
- Architecture: Distilled BERT
- Size: 66M parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Sentiment analysis, text classification, Q&A
- Strengths: Lightweight, faster inference
- Learning Resources: DistilBERT Paper
ERNIE
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 10B parameters
- Training Data: Chinese and English data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, sentiment analysis
- Strengths: Multilingual capabilities, knowledge-enhanced
- Learning Resources: ERNIE Paper
CoCa
- Architecture: Vision-Language Transformer
- Size: 1.1B parameters
- Training Data: Large-scale image-text pairs
- Applications: Image captioning, visual question answering
- Strengths: Cross-modal capabilities
- Learning Resources: CoCa Paper
Switch-C
- Architecture: Mixture of Experts
- Size: 1.6T parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, translation
- Strengths: Scalable, efficient computation
- Learning Resources: Switch-C Paper
Turing-NLG
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 17B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, summarization
- Strengths: High-quality language generation
- Learning Resources: Turing-NLG Paper
FLAN
- Architecture: Instruction-based
- Size: 137B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Instruction following, text generation
- Strengths: Instruction tuning
- Learning Resources: FLAN Paper
Unicoder
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 110M parameters
- Training Data: Multilingual data
- Applications: Text generation, translation, summarization
- Strengths: Multilingual understanding
- Learning Resources: Unicoder Paper
SqueezeBERT
- Architecture: Lightweight Transformer
- Size: 51M parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Sentiment analysis, text classification, Q&A
- Strengths: Low latency, mobile-friendly
- Learning Resources: SqueezeBERT Paper
GShard
- Architecture: Mixture of Experts
- Size: 600B parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Text generation, translation, Q&A
- Strengths: Scalability, parallelism
- Learning Resources: GShard Paper
Jurassic-1
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 178B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, summarization
- Strengths: High-quality language generation
- Learning Resources: Jurassic-1 Paper
Pangu-α
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 200B parameters
- Training Data: Chinese and English data
- Applications: Text generation, translation, summarization
- Strengths: Multilingual capabilities
- Learning Resources: Pangu-α Paper
Turing-Bletchley
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 17B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, summarization
- Strengths: High-quality language generation
- Learning Resources: Turing-Bletchley Paper
CogView
- Architecture: Vision-Language Transformer
- Size: 4B parameters
- Training Data: Image-text pairs
- Applications: Text-to-image generation
- Strengths: High-quality image generation
- Learning Resources: CogView Paper
DialoGPT
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 345M parameters
- Training Data: Reddit conversations
- Applications: Conversational AI
- Strengths: Contextual dialogue generation
- Learning Resources: DialoGPT Paper
GLaM
- Architecture: Mixture of Experts
- Size: 1.2T parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, translation
- Strengths: Scalable, efficient computation
- Learning Resources: GLaM Paper
VQ-VAE-2
- Architecture: Vector Quantized VAE
- Size: 100M parameters
- Training Data: Image data
- Applications: Image generation, compression
- Strengths: High-quality image generation
- Learning Resources: VQ-VAE-2 Paper
LLaMA
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 13B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, summarization
- Strengths: Versatility, language understanding
- Learning Resources: LLaMA Paper
GODEL
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 1.5B parameters
- Training Data: Dialogue data
- Applications: Conversational AI
- Strengths: Contextual dialogue generation
- Learning Resources: GODEL Paper
OPT
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 175B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, summarization
- Strengths: Versatility, language understanding
- Learning Resources: OPT Paper
CLIP
- Architecture: Vision-Language Transformer
- Size: 400M parameters
- Training Data: Image-text pairs
- Applications: Image classification, text-to-image retrieval
- Strengths: Cross-modal capabilities
- Learning Resources: CLIP Paper
BigGAN
- Architecture: GAN-based
- Size: 140M parameters
- Training Data: Image data
- Applications: High-quality image generation
- Strengths: Realistic image generation
- Learning Resources: BigGAN Paper
StyleGAN
- Architecture: GAN-based
- Size: 26.2M parameters
- Training Data: Image data
- Applications: High-quality image generation
- Strengths: Realistic image generation
- Learning Resources: StyleGAN Paper
Codex
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 12B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet code data
- Applications: Code generation, code completion
- Strengths: High-quality code generation
- Learning Resources: Codex Paper
Socratic Models
- Architecture: Multimodal Transformer
- Size: 500M parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Multimodal tasks (image, text)
- Strengths: Cross-modal capabilities
- Learning Resources: Socratic Models Paper
DeBERTa
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 134M (base), 345M (large) parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Sentiment analysis, text classification, Q&A
- Strengths: Enhanced contextual understanding
- Learning Resources: DeBERTa Paper
mT5
- Architecture: Multilingual Transformer
- Size: 13B parameters
- Training Data: C4, multilingual data
- Applications: Translation, summarization, text generation
- Strengths: Multilingual capabilities
- Learning Resources: mT5 Paper
M6
- Architecture: Multimodal Transformer
- Size: 10B parameters
- Training Data: Chinese and English data
- Applications: Text generation, image generation
- Strengths: Multimodal capabilities
- Learning Resources: M6 Paper
MPNet
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 110M parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Sentiment analysis, text classification, Q&A
- Strengths: Enhanced pre-training
- Learning Resources: MPNet Paper
Longformer
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 149M parameters
- Training Data: BooksCorpus, English Wikipedia
- Applications: Text generation, summarization, Q&A
- Strengths: Efficient handling of long documents
- Learning Resources: Longformer Paper
Pegasus
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 568M parameters
- Training Data: C4, HugeNews
- Applications: Text summarization
- Strengths: Pre-training for summarization
- Learning Resources: Pegasus Paper
GPT-Neo
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 2.7B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Text generation, Q&A, summarization
- Strengths: Open-source, versatile
- Learning Resources: GPT-Neo Paper
SAM
- Architecture: Multimodal Transformer
- Size: 1.2B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse internet data
- Applications: Multimodal tasks (image, text, video)
- Strengths: Cross-modal capabilities
- Learning Resources: SAM Paper
LaMDA
- Architecture: Conversational AI
- Size: 137B parameters
- Training Data: Dialogue data
- Applications: Conversational AI
- Strengths: Human-like conversation generation
- Learning Resources: LaMDA Paper
PanGu-α
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 200B parameters
- Training Data: Chinese and English data
- Applications: Text generation, translation, summarization
- Strengths: Multilingual capabilities
- Learning Resources: PanGu-α Paper
BLOOMZ
- Architecture: Transformer-based
- Size: 176B parameters
- Training Data: Multilingual web and literature data
- Applications: Text generation, translation, summarization
- Strengths: Multilingual capabilities
- Learning Resources: BLOOMZ Paper
UnifiedQA
- Architecture: Unified Question Answering
- Size: 11B parameters
- Training Data: Diverse QA datasets
- Applications: Q&A across multiple domains
- Strengths: Unified QA framework
- Learning Resources: UnifiedQA Paper
Exploring Use Cases: From General AI to Cybersecurity
As I delved further, the potential applications of these models in cybersecurity began to unfold. Here are some examples of how LLMs can be utilized in this critical field, most of it might be known to veterans in the fields however for those on the learning path, these insights can be incredibly valuable.
- Threat Detection and Analysis: Models like GPT-4 and BERT can analyze vast amounts of data to identify patterns indicative of security threats. By training these models on cybersecurity datasets, they can predict and flag potential threats in real-time.
- Automated Incident Response: LLMs can assist in creating automated responses to security incidents. For example, T5 can generate comprehensive reports on security breaches, detailing the nature of the attack and suggesting mitigation strategies.
- Phishing Detection: XLNet and RoBERTa can be used to detect phishing emails by analyzing the language and structure of the messages, significantly reducing the risk of successful phishing attacks.
The "Wow" Moments: Realizing the Capabilities
The more I learned, the more I was amazed by the capabilities of LLMs. One of my "wow" moments came when I saw how GPT-3 could generate human-like text that could be used for social engineering simulations. This highlighted the dual-edged nature of AI in cybersecurity, showcasing both its potential for defense and the need for robust safeguards.
Academic Research Usage and Real-World Examples
LLMs are not just theoretical constructs; they have practical applications that impact various industries. Here are a few real-world examples demonstrating their capability and magnitude of impact:
- Healthcare: Medical Research and Diagnosis: GPT-4 has been used in analyzing medical literature to assist in diagnosing rare diseases. By sifting through vast amounts of medical data, it provides insights that can lead to early detection and treatment, potentially saving lives. Example: An AI-powered tool developed by IBM Watson uses LLMs to analyze oncology research and suggest treatment plans, impacting thousands of patients by providing personalized cancer care.
- Finance: Fraud Detection: BERT and similar models are used in the financial sector to detect fraudulent transactions. By analyzing transaction patterns and identifying anomalies, these models help protect against financial crimes. Example: PayPal employs machine learning algorithms, including LLMs, to detect fraudulent activities, protecting millions of users worldwide.
- Legal Industry: Document Review and Legal Research: LLMs like GPT-3 can assist lawyers by reviewing legal documents, summarizing cases, and providing relevant legal precedents, significantly reducing the time required for legal research. Example: Law firms use AI-powered tools to automate contract review processes, ensuring compliance and accuracy while saving substantial amounts of time.
Comprehensive Examples: Bringing It All Together
To illustrate the practical applications of LLMs in cybersecurity research, here are a few comprehensive examples:
- Research Automation: LLMs can automate literature reviews by summarizing large volumes of research papers, helping cybersecurity professionals stay updated with the latest developments. Story: During a critical cybersecurity conference, researchers used an AI-powered summarization tool to quickly analyze and present findings from hundreds of papers, ensuring that attendees had access to the most relevant information in real-time.
- Vulnerability Management: By analysing codebases, models like CodeBERT can identify potential vulnerabilities and suggest patches, enhancing the security of software applications. Story: A major tech company implemented an LLM to continuously scan its code for vulnerabilities. Within months, it had identified and mitigated several critical security flaws, preventing potential breaches and ensuring customer data remained secure.
- Policy Development: Using models like GPT-4, organizations can develop and refine their cybersecurity policies by generating draft documents based on best practices and industry standards. Story: A government agency leveraged AI to draft comprehensive cybersecurity policies. The LLM analyzed existing regulations and proposed enhancements that were later adopted, significantly strengthening the nation's cyber defense strategy.
Encouraging Exploration: A Call to Action
This new learning event has shown me that learning about LLMs is not just for AI specialists. Cybersecurity professionals, researchers, and enthusiasts can all benefit from understanding these models. I encourage everyone to explore the capabilities of LLMs, leveraging resources like academic papers, online courses, and practical tutorials. Anyone without any coding knowledge can build solutions and solve facets of problem or explore pain areas to research further.
From initial confusion to a deep appreciation on possibilities with LLMs, my journey has been transformative. I feel a lot gratitude that we are in the time where AI has reached a dynamic potential, which has begun an era of possibility to learn and unlearn. By sharing my experience, I hope to inspire others to embark on their own learning journeys, exploring the vast potential of Large Language Models.
Resources for Further Learning
For those interested in diving deeper, here are some valuable resources:
- OpenAI GPT-4 Paper: Link
- BERT Research Paper: Link
- T5 Research Paper: Link
- Growth School's AI Courses: Link
By exploring these resources, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of LLMs and their applications, setting the stage for your own journey from confusion to awe.
IT Consultant. Ex-Head Technical Architect software/hardware, Ex-Head Service IT & Quality, ERP S/W Dev, SAP, .Net
9 个月Arun Pillai excellent compilation, the striking observation was "LLM can be understood as Master of Laws (LL.M) instead of Large Language model". The 50 LLMs compilation is useful. Just one question though, 3 LLMs you mentioned for security breach detection : T5 for security incidents and XLNet and RoBERTa can be used to detect phishing emails. How do you apply the prompt or provide the intranet data set to identify attack in intranet ? Referring to the LLM Lingo slide that Krishna Kumar from classes in https://www.buildschool.net/ provided, also available at https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/areganti_genai-llms-training-activity-7189813003393925120-w9SH/, do you use RAG for identifying the security breach in intranet ? How will the use case work ?
Program Manager @ TE Connectivity | Expertise in Digital Transformation, AI Solutions, Lean Six Sigma, PMO Leadership, Change Management, Supply Chain, Continuous Improvement, Roadmap Development, Agile Methodologies.
9 个月Good one..
Cyber Security Leader @ Wipro - Enterprise Security | Digital Transformation | IAM | Governance, Risk & Compliance.
9 个月Amazing progress!
C.A. and SAP FICO consultant with 9 years experience. Completed 2 implementations in S/4 HANA, 3 Global Rollout for APAC, EMEA and US respectively.
9 个月Impressive and Inspiring as well..!!