From AI Helper to Human Validator

In my every day life, I use Language Models (LMs) to clarify complex concepts, critique my arguments, and act as editors for my work. Traditionally, my control over these models has allowed me to dictate their role in my workflow. However, I believe a shift is on the horizon.

I foresee a future where AI integration in business processes transitions from optional assistance to obligatory oversight, transforming from a “helper” to a “validator” tasked with ensuring the human output aligns with set expectations.

We’re already seeing the emergence of this concept in AI research where Language Models themselves, rather than human evaluation, are used to Evaluate their performance on industry benchmarks. There are many emerging frameworks, such as SCALEEVAL, a scalable, agent-debate assisted meta-evaluation framework for assessing the reliability and robustness of LLMs as evaluators. As these evaluation frameworks continue to progress, I believe that will pave the way for LLMs as human validators.

The Inevitable Evolution

The potential for AI to transition from a supportive to a validating function in our workflows means a change in our relationship with these technologies.

For AI to successfully assume a role as a validator, several advancements are necessary:

• Ability to Fact-Check: Because LMs are trained on both the factual and un-factual content from the internet their ability to assess truth is limited. AI must be able to verify the accuracy of information against reliable sources in real time and distinguishing between factual content and misinformation in order to ensure that they are not instilling incorrect information or bias into their human counterpart’s work product.
• Reasoning Through Complex Problems: Enhancing AI’s capacity for logical deduction and problem-solving in complex scenarios is crucial for it to provide meaningful feedback and validation. Without the ability to multi-step reason, the LM could jump to incorrect conclusions about their human counterpart’s work.
• Self-Correction: AI should possess the ability to learn from its mistakes, adjusting its algorithms based on feedback to improve its accuracy and reliability over time. This way it can adapt to the working style, tone, and even view points of its human counterpart.

Opportunities Ahead

The evolution of AI into a mandatory component of business processes heralds significant benefits:

• Improved Quality of Work: AI’s validation will likely yield a higher standard of thoroughness and accuracy. In joint collaboration with its human counterpart, it will retain the human touch but contain the expertise sourced from the internet that AI is able to provide.
• Solo Collaboration: The Human — AI relationship allows collaboration to occur even when working independently. Working hand in hand with a LM can provide insights that one might not have considered resulting in a more creative solution.
• Efficiency in Producing Quality Work: The integration of AI in validating processes can significantly reduce the time required to produce high-quality work. Instead of waiting for another co-worker’s feedback, it offers near instant suggestions for improvement.

Challenges on the Horizon

This transition, however, is not without its challenges:

• Ethical Implications: Leaving value judgements to technology can be frightening, especially when that technology is not transparent in exactly how its outputs are produced. Ethical concerns will need to be at the forefront of model development to ensure that the human-AI relationship is symbiotic and complies with stringent ethical standards.
• Accuracy Concerns: The reliability of AI validations is contingent on the model’s understanding and reasoning capabilities. If those capabilities are flawed, the LM could propagate errors rather than ensure quality.
• The Ability to Over-rule: Just as humans fail to produce perfect work products, sometimes LMs won’t get it right. The indispensable value of human judgment and oversight in evaluating AI’s validations cannot be overstated and there must be the option for a human to make the final judgment on AI’s suggestions.

Conclusion

It’s essential to prepare ourselves for a future where AI not only aids but also assesses our work. Improvements in a LMs ability to fact check, self correct, and perform complex reasoning will enable AI as a human validator resulting in improved quality work products, more efficient business processes, and encapsulate the benefits of collaboration even when working solo. What are some business processes in which you think having an LM validator would be beneficial?

Interested in discussing more or collaborating on a future article? Reach out on LinkedIn!