From an Agile Coach to a Value Delivery, Continuous Improvement Coach

#FromAgileToValueDelivery #WhatIsInATitle #MoreThanAgile

We need to stop being Agile Coaches and start being Value Delivery Continuous Improvement Coaches. Agile principles remain extremely important, but they are but a part of a much bigger ecosystem that needs a full alignment for success.

In 1996, Ron Jeffries, Kent Beck, and Ward Cunningham created a software development technique called Extreme Programming, "XP." A few years later, the Agile movement subsumed XP, and it became just one of the tools in the Agile toolkit.

Fast forward to the mid-2000s, and competing approaches emerged for "scaling" Agile. Scaled Agile Inc., introduced more developed and integrated ideas around Lean Portfolio Management and Product Management. Competing scaled agile frameworks such as LeSS, DAD, Spotify, Nexus, SAFe, et al., challenged us to stop obsessing on local optimization (e.g., just making this or that team "Agile"). Instead, we should think of the entire flow of value, from concept-to-cash as a system in its own right (AKA "Systems Thinking").

Meanwhile, Toyota' Lean Manufacturing principles began blending with Agile principles. Then the DevOps movement arrived. Architectural evolution continued along with new ways of working on a team. Mike Cohn just put out an article declaring that Sprint Reviews need to go away or be reimagined in light of the evolving tech landscape. 

A flurry of creativity around approaches to ideation and prioritization began a few years ago. There are East coast and West coast variants of the UX Design Strategy, and other variants are popping up that try to split the difference between them.

Karen Martin, Mary Poppendick, et al. taught us how to do value stream mapping. This tool helps to dissolve silos and get organizations to take ownership of their improvements. However, this is just one tool in a coach's toolbox.

We've been called out for focusing on narrow facets of the flow of value. Rather than seeing the multiple disciplines that, together, facilitate working on the right thing, we tend to only focus on the emphasis-du-jour (OKRs, Value Stream Mapping, RAPID, and other useful tools and techniques). It takes the broad view to deliver value expediently with quality to delight the customer.

Add to that the excellent facilitation skills that coaches must possess, and it's not nearly sufficient to know Agile practices. Coaches have to be masters at listening, at helping others to solve their challenges themselves, rather than being process policemen that force compliance on an organization. 

Given what is needed to help an organization succeed, the title, "Agile Coach" grotesquely ill-frames what our clients need. We must help them learn how to improve, continuously, at delivering value that delights the customer. That's a complicated journey involving the executive team down to the janitorial staff. It needs factory-like efficiencies, yet it's an entirely human endeavor. Cultivating success requires wisdom, magic, patience, humility, passion, and persistence.

As coaches, we must not deliver Agile processes. With constant reflection and improvement, we must help equip an organization to deliver continuously improving value to the customer. We can use Agile, Lean, DevOps, Lean Portfolio Management, UX Design Strategy frameworks, and a myriad of other tools, but we aren't just glorified team coaches. We must engage the entire enterprise with more than one tool, and that's more than merely being an "Agile" Coach.

Rick Vance

Transformational thought leader who successfully helps organizations solve business problems thru lean-agile mindset.

5 年

Yep!

Victor Mercado, PMP

Technology Agile Program / Project Professional

5 年

Outstanding perspective! For years now, I have seen companies minimize the value in Agile Coaching due to the perceived lack of value and impact to the bottom line. I have heard “we like the structure, but why do we need a coach for it?” And this is entrenched in the experiences of senior leaders that have learned to equate coaching to pontification and structure. Where instead, they should create the association of Value Delivery, Speed and Continuous Improvement if only we would add some Agile to our Agile Coaching.

Cinnamon Skewes, PMP

Strategic Program Director | Leading Cloud Migrations & AI Innovation Driving Transformation through Cutting-Edge Technology Implementation

5 年

Well said Mike!

Gwenn Zylla

Reader. Writer. Protect Children

5 年

Great article!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mike Strong的更多文章

  • Leaders! Don't Process Virtue Signal - Coach, Mentor, and Support Your Organization

    Leaders! Don't Process Virtue Signal - Coach, Mentor, and Support Your Organization

    Few, if any, software development organizations have telemetry wired up over the entire value delivery journey. At one…

    6 条评论
  • You Made Us Late!

    You Made Us Late!

    Which team made another team late? Please pardon the personal anecdote. No analogy is perfect.

    1 条评论
  • Group Book Study Choices Pending

    Group Book Study Choices Pending

    Dear Fellow Book Study Members and Continuous Learners, There Was No January Study For those who've followed our book…

  • The Divergent/Convergent Cycle and the Minimum Viable Process

    The Divergent/Convergent Cycle and the Minimum Viable Process

    A recurring theme that keeps emerging among many thought leaders in our day is that humans compromise or even sabotage…

  • Scaling Agile Missteps

    Scaling Agile Missteps

    #SAFe #DADs #LeSS #Spotify #Agile It seems most at-scale approaches to Lean and Agile draw from the same sources of…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了