Four steps to sales training that supercharges sales effectiveness

Four steps to sales training that supercharges sales effectiveness

It's time for another edition of the?Art & Science of Complex Sales!?If you're new, this is where we talk about all things related to putting HOW you sell at the core of your business -- from sales process execution to best practices in sales coaching to driving winning behaviors to enabling growth in your sales organization.

Every week, I share ONE idea or strategy that sales leaders and teams can use to enable consistent growth for their organization. Whether you're a sales leader, sales consultant, sales manager, sales enablement expert or sales team member ready to accelerate your performance -- you'll find one action item that you can implement each week to get you one step closer to your goals.

My mission is to elevate the sales profession with technology and partnerships so that we can all improve our sales effectiveness and raise the bar in sales.

Now, onto this week's topic! ????

Four steps to sales training that supercharges sales effectiveness

According to the Association for Talent Development, $20 billion is spent on sales training in the US alone.?With such a large investment, one might expect sales effectiveness to be on the rise, yet it isn’t.

In many cases, the sales training that is offered inside organizations doesn’t match up with the needs of a changing sales environment, or the needs of today’s salespeople. Even organizations that adopt new methodologies and strategies based in current reality often struggle to get their salespeople to retain and master the skills they need.

We’ve been working with sales organizations to improve sales effectiveness since our inception, and in that time we’ve looked hard at what works, and what doesn’t, for getting sales teams to adopt new approaches and apply their training in meaningful ways. Here are the four things every sales organization can do to get the most out of their sales training investment.

1. Avoid content overload

The traditional sales training model focuses on a single big training “event,” from which salespeople are expected to glean new skills and abilities, and apply them in their day-to-day jobs. Even organizations that offer ongoing “refreshers” tend to dump content on their salespeople and hope they learn from it, without offering substantial support for that learning.

We know from neuroscience that our brains are not built to retain large chunks of information all at once. We know from sales studies that most training, when it goes without reinforcement, is lost within 90 days of a training event.

To avoid this trap, organizations must take a longer-term view of their training; one that incorporates ongoing training and reinforcement, and provides content in bite-sized chunks that are available for use when and where the salespeople need them. We also need to arm coaches and managers with training assets and visibility into the salespeople’s progress, so that they can reinforce training when it is most useful to the salespeople.

2. Better training and development for sales managers

As Dave Brock pointed out in a recent discussion , the vast majority of sales training investment goes to salespeople, with only small amounts dedicated to sales management and coaching. Front line sales managers are responsible for overseeing the success of their entire teams, choosing the right tools and systems, providing guidance, and holding teams accountable. Yet these individuals are most often simply high-performing salespeople who have been promoted without significant support or development in the new skills required of them in a management position. As a result, they are poorly positioned to promote the ongoing reinforcement of sales training.

We recommend that organizations dedicate part of their training investment to developing sales managers and giving them the skills necessary to support high performance on their teams. Additionally, tools and software need to go beyond reporting, and focus also on giving managers visibility into what their salespeople are doing and what they need most from their managers – in real-time and actual job activities.

3. Align the curriculum map with the sales process map

Traditional training programs focus on skillsets mapped to a curriculum, often in a “level one,” “level two,” “level three” format. While this may be a useful method of grading how far a salesperson has progressed in their mastery of specific skillsets, it is a poor method for driving actual mastery of those skillsets and aligning it to their day-to-day jobs.

Learning occurs best when it is matched with the circumstances to which it applies. In other words, we learn fastest and best when we are able to apply the skill immediately, and/or have it reinforced at the point that we are ready to use it.

For sales organizations that want to drive high performance, it pays to map training to a proven sales process, and then deliver training resources at the appropriate points in that process.

4. Invest in technology to support ongoing learning

Even in companies where training is ongoing, mapped to a proven process, and reinforced by coaching, most do not have the technological capability to truly track training effectiveness in relation to actual job performance. Generally, training assets are stored in a learning management system (LMS), with, at best, some connectivity to the CRM. Under these conditions, a few high performing salespeople may take the time to access learning resources from time to time, but their use will be limited and self-regulated. ?


This article was first published on the Membrain blog here: https://www.membrain.com/blog/four-steps-to-sales-training-that-supercharges-sales-effectiveness


Ralf Schmidt

B2B Marketing & Sales Excellence expert & practitioner ∞ Focus on chemicals ∞ Looking forward to supporting your value creation and communication, Value Selling and pricing ∞ >25 years of experience ∞ PhD in Marketing ∞

9 个月

I think that's a matter of mindset, approach and tools. As a sales trainer you should not ask yourself "How can I train this in that sales organization?". You should ask yourself "What can I do to support the organization changing their approach?" To give you an example:?This is how we support the change towards Value Selling (based on support from the top): 1) Training Sales will not be enough. You have to involve Sales, Marketing, Technical Service / Development. + in a later step all other functions. Therefore we invite Sales, Marketing and technical people to a cross-functional training/workshop. 2) In that workshop they use tools like our Value Card that help them to discover the true value of their products, services and solutions. 3) Thereby all functions discover what needs to be changed and get encouraged to drive that change. E.g. regarding the way they sell, the way they promote their solutions and the way they do technical product training. The Value Card and other tools support the process. 4) We only train and coach people based on their business specific examples, instead of sharing another iphone story. This makes them understand how to make it work in their business. This requires experienced trainers.

?? Dr STEVE LABORDA

CEO | Chemical Industry Expert ?? | Focused on Customer Excellence and Profitability through Value Selling and Sales & Marketing Enablement

9 个月

All very valid points George Brontén ! On 1. I would also it is essential to combine various training and coaching approaches in the form of learning journeys. The typical 2 days training can still be at the Art of that journey but much more practical and towards sales experiencing. While the content and method learning can be supported by #digital learnings and all that reinforced to make it sustainable sticking through coaching and on the job shadowing. #valuebizbooster #doubleloop Ralf Schmidt as a lover of digital learning what do you say?

Peter Strohkorb

Top 27 Sales Advisor, globally | 25+ Years Sales Expertise, 100+ LI Recommendations, 2 x Book Author, Salesforce SalesBlazer | ?? Your Buyers Have Changed How They Buy -> Is Your Sales Funnel Buyer-Focused ? ??

9 个月

Regarding your Point 2. Better training and development for sales managers: Absolutely agree with this point, George Brontén, thank you for making it. There is, however, a dark side to it, too. All too often, sales managers are driven hard to focus on monitoring and accelerating their reps' pipelines, rather than coaching and developing them. When sales training is offered to the reps, often the sales managers are "too busy, or too important" to participate in the sales training offered to their reps. As a consequence, they are not across the new learnings. Invariably, as the reps apply the new learnings, it will take some time for sales to improve. In act, things may temporarily get worse before they get better. At which time, the sales manager will panic and tell the reps to go back to whatever they were doing before. T his of course renders the entire sales training exercise, time, effort and investment useless. Therefore, it is important that the sales manager actively participates in the reps' sales training AS WELL AS receive training and coaching to be enable them too coach their team effectively in the new ways.

Hervé Humbert

Revenues growth is good? But convinced it could be even better?

9 个月

Amen to this George . The organisations that properly fully benefit from our collaboration (I do sales transformation, mostly, a little bit of sales training ??) are those where sales management is fully onboard and implements a right approach to their craft - as too many mistakes done there indeed -.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了