The Four Ms of Advocacy: Matter (Part 5)

The Four Ms of Advocacy: Matter (Part 5)

David Bennett AC QC introduced his structure by reference to the Four “M’s”: Milieu, Manner, Matter and Method. 

David’s first four points about “Matter” were first: remember that you are there to persuade, so your starting point is to think about how the judge(s) is/are likely to want to decide the case. Second: do not lose sight of the fact that your task is to persuade a person, just as you do in many other facets of your life. Third: a question from the Bench is a godsend. Fourth: prepare for the Court to test your proposition by taking it to the extremes.

David continues.

Matter

Work with your team

It’s important, in your preparation phase, to work with your team, and this is where a team approach is very important, where you need the juniors, the solicitors, the paralegals and possibly even the clients, to discuss with them how the questions you anticipate should be answered. 

It gives you a wonderful feeling of warmth and deep down comfort when you have prepared the answer so well with your team and then you get to court and the judge asks the question.

Identifying your weak points

The final thing about “matter” is the old cliche, “should you argue your weak points”. There is a real problem here. Lots of people including judges and experienced advocates will say to you “you should stick to your strong points and abandon your weak ones.”

There’s a problem with that. What is a strong point? Who decides? You may think a point is weak but the judge may actually see something in it. 

I can think of cases where I’ve had two points. I think that one is strong and one is weak, but I’ve lost the strong one and won the weak one. Like most advocates, I’ve been wrong about what was the weak and what was the strong point. 

That’s why you do have to be careful about identifying weak points. If you’re really satisfied as to what they are, discuss them with your team and then abandon them.

So that’s “Matter”.


This is part of a series of posts containing a speech on advocacy given by David Bennett AC QC, which he has kindly agreed to publish through advocacyhub. Read the full article here: https://www.advocacyhub.com.au/david-bennett-ac-qc/

Subscribe to Advocacy Hub’s monthly newsletter featuring interviews with senior advocates here: https://www.advocacyhub.com.au/subscribe/

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ben Katekar SC FCIArb的更多文章

  • A Judge’s Grinding Task

    A Judge’s Grinding Task

    From my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. After Court each day Mr Jacobson would review the evidence of the day…

    6 条评论
  • Peter Jacobson QC’s Favourite Peter Hely QC Story

    Peter Jacobson QC’s Favourite Peter Hely QC Story

    From my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. Mr Jacobson considers that few advocates compare to the late Peter Hely QC.

    4 条评论
  • The Hallmark of a Superlative Advocate

    The Hallmark of a Superlative Advocate

    From my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. Mr Jacobson considers that what sets an advocate apart is his or her ability…

    3 条评论
  • A Question from the Bench Is Not Always a Gift

    A Question from the Bench Is Not Always a Gift

    From my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. When Mr Jacobson was a junior he was led by Alec Shand QC in a trial…

    2 条评论
  • Handling Questions from the Bench

    Handling Questions from the Bench

    From my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. The “Peter Hely rule” is helpful when handling questions from the Bench.

    3 条评论
  • Crunch the Appeal Books

    Crunch the Appeal Books

    From my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. One of the secrets of good appellate advocacy is to “crunch the appeal books”.

    2 条评论
  • Peter Jacobson QC on Appellate Advocacy

    Peter Jacobson QC on Appellate Advocacy

    From my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. David Jackson QC is a great appellate advocate – one of the greats.

    1 条评论
  • Persuasion requires Engagement

    Persuasion requires Engagement

    From my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. Engagement with the Bench is terribly important.

    2 条评论
  • Brevity requires mastery of the detail

    Brevity requires mastery of the detail

    From my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. Being brief does not mean “dumbing it down”.

    3 条评论
  • Achieving Agility

    Achieving Agility

    This is the second in my series of posts from my interview with Peter Jacobson QC. An advocate has to be able to adjust…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了