Foundationally Fundamental Series 3: Understanding Normal & Shear Stress Acting on Soil or Rock.

Foundationally Fundamental Series 3: Understanding Normal & Shear Stress Acting on Soil or Rock.

Building upon the foundational knowledge of stress and strain from our previous article, this series aims to delve deeper into the intricacies of stress in geotechnical contexts. Understanding the response of a body of soil or rock to stress is crucial for predicting and managing the stability of geological and structural formations. We start with the basic principles, ensuring a solid grasp of the concepts, to facilitate comprehension of more complex theories as we progress through the series. While it's a common perception that stress is inherently detrimental to materials such as soil or rock, this is not entirely accurate. Stress, in fact, can provide a confining pressure that enables soil and rock to maintain structural integrity and perform as expected. This essential aspect of geotechnical engineering allows us to utilize these materials in a constructive way, stabilizing formations and supporting human-made structures. It's this nuanced understanding of stress—beyond its potential for causing failure—that we will explore and build upon throughout this series.

Let's reexamine the nature of normal and shear stresses. Normal stress, denoted by σ (sigma), acts perpendicular to a surface and can either compress (compressive stress) or stretch (tensile stress) soil or rock. Shear stress, represented by τ (tau) and acting parallel to the surface, tends to cause rotation or sliding, which may lead to instability. illustration will help visualize these forces. Understanding σ and τ is fundamental to our study of geotechnical stability.

Figure 1 Normal stress & shear stress visualization.


Observing the free diagram of soil element on figure 2 below, we discern that normal stresses σy and σx act along the y and x axes, respectively, each depicted by distinct solid lines—blue for σy and red for σx. Shear stresses τyx and τxy intersect these axes, with τyx cutting across the y axis towards the x direction, and τxy crossing the x axis towards the y direction. The convention dictates that compressive normal stresses are positive, thus both σx and σy are positive. For shear stresses, those that result in a counter-clockwise rotation are considered positive, making τxy a positive shear stress, whereas τyx is negative. This delineation is crucial for understanding the stress state in soils.


Figure 2 Orientation of normal stress & shear stress in free diagram of soil element.

?


When we slice through a soil element along the line EF, making an angle θ with the horizontal, the resulting plane must be in equilibrium. This state is maintained by specific normal (σn) and shear (τn) stresses on the plane EF. For geotechnical engineers, it's critical to compute these stresses, as they parallel real-world scenarios like slopes in mining operations. The calculations for these stresses, illustrated in Figure 3, are essential for designing stable structures and ensuring safety.

Figure 3 Normal stress & shear stress acting on the E-F surface.


Presented here are the equations for computing the normal and shear stresses on the EF plane, which utilize fundamental trigonometry principles. Though it may seem intricate at first glance, these calculations pave the way to the more riveting aspects of soil mechanics, such as the Mohr-Coulomb theory, which we'll explore shortly.


Figure 4 Equation for direct calculations of normal & shear stresses.

?


Faraz Sya'bana

Mine Plan Engineer

1 年

Good day, Pak Fery. Why is the visualization of τxy in Figure 3 pointing upwards? Is it to create an equilibrium condition? Or any other reason for that? Thanks

回复
Joe Seery

Director and Principal Geotechnical Engineer at Bastion Geotechnical Pty Ltd

1 年

Man, I hate AI generated images...

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Fery Cahyo的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了