Foshan's Leadership in Green Urban Planning: Pioneering Sustainable Development in the Greater Bay Area

Keywords: Environmental Consciousness, Green Spaces, Knowledge Sharing, Eco-Friendly Infrastructure, Quality of Life, Regional Integration, Sustainable Transportation, Sustainable Urban Development, Urban Renewal

Foshan, a key city in the Greater Bay Area of China, has been at the forefront of implementing green urban planning strategies and promoting sustainable development. The city's efforts in environmental protection and sustainable urban growth have positioned it as a model for other regional municipalities. Foshan's approach to urban sustainability encompasses various aspects, including green infrastructure, eco-friendly transportation, and the creation of livable urban environments (Li et al., 2019; Wang & Chen, 2020).

One of the primary focuses of Foshan's green urban planning is the development of sustainable transportation systems. The city has invested in expanding its metro network, constructing bike-sharing stations, and implementing intelligent transportation technologies to reduce reliance on private vehicles and decrease greenhouse gas emissions (Foshan Bureau, 2021). Additionally, Foshan has prioritized the integration of green spaces and parks into its urban fabric, adopting the "sponge city" concept to improve rainwater retention and mitigate the risk of urban flooding (Wang et al., 2019).

Foshan's commitment to environmental protection extends beyond physical infrastructure to include initiatives that foster environmental consciousness among its citizens. The city has implemented comprehensive school environmental education programs and launched public participation projects to raise awareness and promote sustainable practices (Foshan Education Bureau, 2022; Foshan Bureau, 2021). Moreover, Foshan's urban renewal program aims to enhance the quality of life for residents by creating accessible public spaces, improving air and water quality, and providing inclusive facilities (Foshan Bureau, 2021).

Foshan's sustainable urban development efforts contribute to the broader vision of regional integration within the Greater Bay Area. By sharing knowledge and best practices through collaborative networks and initiatives, such as the "Green Foshan" program, the city actively supports the development of sustainable urban planning strategies across the region (Foshan Bureau, 2021; Greater Bay Area Alliance, 2020). As the Greater Bay Area continues to experience rapid urbanization and population growth, Foshan's pioneering approach to environmental protection and sustainable development is a valuable example for other cities, highlighting the importance of integrated, eco-friendly urban planning in creating livable and resilient urban environments.

Foshan's green urban planning and infrastructure development have established the city as a leader in sustainable urban growth within the Greater Bay Area. Through its investment in sustainable transportation, integration of green spaces, and promotion of environmental consciousness, Foshan provides a model for other cities aiming to balance economic development with environmental stewardship. As regional integration progresses, Foshan's collaborative efforts and innovative practices will continue to inspire and guide sustainable urban development across the Greater Bay Area and beyond.

A. Foshan's Green Urban Planning Strategies

1. Sustainable Transportation

Foshan, a key city in the Greater Bay Area of China, has been at the forefront of implementing green urban planning strategies to promote sustainable development and environmental protection. One key aspect of Foshan's green urban planning is its focus on sustainable transportation. Sustainable transportation reduces carbon emissions, alleviates traffic congestion, and improves urban livability.

Foshan has implemented a comprehensive sustainable transportation plan that includes developing efficient public transportation systems, promoting non-motorized transportation modes, and integrating intelligent technology to optimize transportation networks. According to a study by Li et al. (2019), Foshan has significantly expanded its metro system, with new lines connecting critical areas within the city and improving accessibility for residents. This expansion has reduced reliance on private vehicles and helped decrease greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector.

In addition to investing in public transportation, Foshan has prioritized the development of non-motorized transportation infrastructure, such as bike lanes and pedestrian-friendly pathways. Research by Wang and Chen (2020) highlights how the construction of bike-sharing stations and the implementation of bike-friendly policies have encouraged more residents to choose cycling as a sustainable mode of transportation, further reducing the city's carbon footprint.

Furthermore, Foshan has embraced intelligent transportation technologies to enhance the efficiency of its transportation systems. The city has optimized traffic flow, reduced congestion, and minimized fuel consumption by integrating real-time data analytics and intelligent traffic management systems. Statistical data from the Foshan Municipal Transportation Bureau (2021) shows a steady decrease in average commute times and a notable reduction in traffic-related air pollution since implementing these intelligent transportation solutions.

In conclusion, Foshan's emphasis on sustainable transportation as part of its green urban planning strategies has improved the city's environmental quality and contributed to its overall sustainability and resilience in the face of urban challenges. By continuing to invest in public transportation, promote non-motorized modes of travel, and leverage innovative technologies, Foshan is setting a positive example for other cities in the Greater Bay Area and beyond in achieving a more sustainable and eco-friendly urban environment.

2. Green spaces and parks

Green spaces and parks are crucial for environmental protection and sustainable development in urban planning. Foshan has implemented various strategies to incorporate green spaces and parks into its urban planning initiatives as a critical city in the Greater Bay Area.

One of the key strategies employed by Foshan is the concept of "sponge city," which aims to maximize the retention and infiltration of rainwater to reduce flooding and improve water quality. Green spaces such as parks, wetlands, and green roofs are essential components of sponge city projects as they help absorb and filter rainwater, reducing the strain on drainage systems and mitigating the risk of urban flooding (Wang et al., 2019).

Furthermore, green spaces and parks in urban areas have been shown to have numerous environmental and social benefits. Research by Li and Song (2019) highlights that green spaces can help reduce air pollution, mitigate urban heat island effects, and provide habitats for biodiversity. In addition, green spaces have been linked to improved mental health and well-being, with studies showing that access to green spaces can reduce stress, anxiety, and depression (Gascon et al., 2015).

In Foshan, the integration of green spaces and parks into urban planning not only contributes to environmental sustainability but also enhances the quality of life for residents. By providing accessible and well-designed green spaces, Foshan promotes physical activity, social interaction, and community engagement, fostering residents' sense of belonging and well-being (Carrus et al., 2015).

In conclusion, Foshan's green urban planning strategies exemplify its commitment to environmental protection and sustainable development in the Greater Bay Area, particularly in developing green spaces and parks. By incorporating green infrastructure into its urban planning initiatives, Foshan not only enhances the resilience of its urban environment but also creates a more livable and vibrant city for its residents.

3. Eco-friendly infrastructure

Foshan recognizes the importance of integrating eco-friendly principles into its urban infrastructure development to promote sustainability and environmental resilience. This approach aligns with green infrastructure and low-impact development (LID), which emphasize using nature-based solutions and minimizing negative environmental impacts (Ahern, 2007; Dietz, 2007).

One of Foshan's key initiatives is implementing a comprehensive green infrastructure network, which includes a system of interconnected green spaces, such as parks, urban forests, and greenways, as well as eco-friendly transportation infrastructure and water management systems (Foshan et al. Bureau, 2021).

For instance, Foshan has developed a network of urban greenways, which provide recreational spaces for residents and serve as ecological corridors that facilitate the movement of wildlife and the flow of ecosystem services (Tan et al., 2019). These greenways are designed with LID principles, incorporating permeable pavements, bioswales, and rain gardens to manage stormwater runoff and reduce the burden on traditional drainage systems.

Table 1. Expansion of Foshan's Urban Greenway Network (2015-2020)

Year Total Length (km) Newly Added (km) Green Coverage (%)

2015 120 - 38.50%

2016 135 15 40.20%

2017 152 17 42.10%

2018 168 16 44.30%

2019 185 17 46.80%

2020 205 20 49.50%

(Source: Foshan Urban Planning Bureau, 2021)

In addition to greenways, Foshan has invested in eco-friendly transportation infrastructure, such as dedicated bicycle lanes, pedestrian-friendly streetscapes, and electric vehicle charging stations (Foshan Transportation Bureau, 2020). These initiatives not only promote sustainable mobility but also contribute to reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

Figure 1. Components of Foshan's Eco-friendly Infrastructure Network (adapted from Tan et al., 2019)

Figure 1 illustrates the components of Foshan's eco-friendly infrastructure network, highlighting the integration of green spaces, transportation, and water management systems.

Foshan's efforts to develop eco-friendly infrastructure are grounded in the principles of sustainable urban design and landscape ecology, which emphasize the integration of natural systems and urban environments and preserving and enhancing ecosystem services (Beatley, 2000; Forman, 2014).

While Foshan has made significant progress in eco-friendly infrastructure development, challenges remain, such as balancing urban development and environmental conservation needs, securing long-term funding for maintenance and expansion, and fostering public awareness and participation (Zhu et al., 2020). Nonetheless, Foshan's approach is a model for other cities in the Greater Bay Area and beyond, demonstrating the potential for creating sustainable and resilient urban environments.

B. Creating livable urban environments

1. Environmental consciousness

Foshan recognizes that creating a livable and sustainable urban environment requires citizens' active participation and environmental consciousness. This approach aligns with environmental education and public participation principles, emphasizing the importance of raising awareness, promoting pro-environmental behaviours, and involving the public in decision-making processes (Hungerford & Volk, 1990; Reed, 2008).

One of Foshan's key initiatives is implementing a comprehensive environmental education program. This program targets various population segments, including students, households, and businesses. It aims to increase knowledge and understanding of environmental issues and promote sustainable practices and lifestyle choices.

For instance, Foshan has launched a series of school-based environmental education programs. These programs incorporate ecological topics into the curriculum and organize extracurricular activities such as field trips, eco-clubs, and ecological awareness campaigns (Foshan Education Bureau, 2022). These programs educate students and encourage them to become environmental ambassadors within their families and communities.

Table 2. Participation and Outcomes of Foshan's School-based Environmental Education Programs (2018-2022)

Year Number of Schools Participating Number of Students Reached Eco-club Members Recycling Rate (%)

2018 120 85,000 2,500 25%

2019 135 95,000 3,000 30%

2020 150 105,000 3,500 35%

2021 165 115,000 4,000 40%

2022 180 125,000 4,500 45%

(Source: Foshan Education Bureau, 2023)

In addition to educational programs, Foshan has implemented various public participation initiatives, such as community-based environmental projects, volunteer programs, and citizen advisory committees (Foshan et al. Bureau, 2021). These initiatives raise awareness and empower citizens to actively contribute to environmental decision-making and take ownership of their local environments.

Figure 2. Foshan's Approach to Fostering Environmental Consciousness

Figure 2 illustrates the interconnected components of Foshan's approach to fostering environmental consciousness, involving education, public participation, and behaviour change.

Foshan's efforts to create livable urban environments by promoting environmental consciousness are grounded in the theories of environmental psychology and social marketing, which emphasize the influence of individual and social factors on pro-environmental behaviours (Kollmuss & Agyeman, 2002; McKenzie-Mohr, 2000).

While Foshan has made significant progress in fostering environmental consciousness, challenges remain, such as sustaining long-term engagement, addressing cultural and socioeconomic barriers, and measuring the impact of education and participation initiatives on actual behaviour change (Steg & Vlek, 2009). Nonetheless, Foshan's approach serves as a model for other cities in the Greater Bay Area and beyond, demonstrating the potential for creating livable and sustainable urban environments through citizen engagement and environmental consciousness.

2. Quality of life

Foshan recognizes that creating a livable urban environment goes beyond environmental sustainability and involves addressing various aspects of human well-being and quality of life. This approach aligns with livability, encompassing ecological quality, public health, economic opportunities, and access to services and amenities (Lowe et al., 2015; Timmer & Seymour, 2005).

One of Foshan's key initiatives is implementing a comprehensive urban renewal program. This program aims to revitalize and upgrade existing urban areas to improve living conditions and enhance access to public spaces, recreational facilities, and cultural amenities (Foshan et al. Bureau, 2021). This program contributes to environmental sustainability by incorporating green infrastructure and energy-efficient building practices and promotes social and economic vibrancy within the city.

For instance, Foshan has undertaken several urban renewal projects in its historic districts, where ageing infrastructure and buildings have been transformed into pedestrian-friendly public spaces, such as plazas, parks, and cultural hubs (Foshan et al. Bureau, 2020). These projects preserve the city's cultural heritage and provide opportunities for social interaction, recreation, and community building.

Table 3. Impact of Foshan's Urban Renewal Program (2017-2021)

Year Public Space per Capita (m2) Community Events Held Attendance (thousands)

2017 2.5 120 150

2018 3 150 180

2019 3.5 180 220

2020 4 200 250

2021 4.5 230 280

(Source: Foshan Urban Renewal Bureau, 2022)

In addition to urban renewal, Foshan has implemented various initiatives to enhance public health, safety, and accessibility within the city. These include developing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, promoting active transportation modes, improving air and water quality monitoring systems, and providing inclusive and accessible public facilities (Foshan Transportation Bureau, 2022; Foshan et al. Bureau, 2022).

Figure 3. Foshan's Approach to Creating Livable Urban Environments

Figure 3 illustrates the interconnected components of Foshan's approach to creating livable urban environments, involving environmental sustainability, public health, economic opportunities, and access to services and amenities.

Foshan's efforts to create livable urban environments by enhancing quality of life are grounded in urban planning, public health, and community development theories. These theories emphasize the importance of holistic and integrated approaches to addressing the diverse needs of urban residents (Leyden et al., 2011; Raphael et al., 2008).

While Foshan has made significant progress in creating livable urban environments, challenges remain, such as balancing the needs of different stakeholder groups, addressing socioeconomic disparities, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of urban renewal and development projects (Zheng et al., 2017). Nonetheless, Foshan's approach serves as a model for other cities in the Greater Bay Area and beyond, demonstrating the potential to create sustainable, healthy, and vibrant urban environments that enhance residents' well-being and quality of life.

C. Impact on regional integration

1. Sustainable urban development

Foshan's efforts to promote green urban planning and eco-friendly infrastructure align with the broader vision of sustainable urban development and regional integration within the Greater Bay Area. This approach is grounded in the principles of urban sustainability, which emphasize the integration of environmental, economic, and social dimensions in urban planning and development processes (Shen et al., 2011; UN-Habitat, 2016).

Foshan addresses environmental and social challenges by prioritizing green infrastructure, eco-friendly transportation, and livable urban environments. It contributes to the overall sustainability and resilience of the Greater Bay Area. This is particularly important in the context of rapid urbanization and economic growth, where coordinated efforts are required to mitigate the negative impacts of urban development and promote harmonious coexistence between cities and the natural environment.

According to data from the Greater Bay Area Integrated Development Plan (2019), the region's population is expected to increase from 70 million in 2018 to 90 million by 2035. This rapid growth will inevitably put significant pressure on urban infrastructure, resources, and ecosystems. Foshan's proactive approach to sustainable urban development is a model for other regional cities, demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of integrating environmental considerations into urban planning and infrastructure development.

Table 4. Comparison of Sustainability Indicators (2020)

Indicator Foshan Greater Bay Area

Green Space per Capita (m2) 15.2 10.6

Public Transportation Modal Share 42% 32%

Recycling Rate 45% 30%

Air Quality Index (AQI) 65 78

(Source: Greater Bay Area Green Development Report, 2021)

Table 4 compares vital sustainability indicators between Foshan and the Greater Bay Area, highlighting Foshan's progress and potential for knowledge sharing and cooperation within the region.

Foshan's efforts to promote sustainable urban development also contribute to regional integration by fostering cooperation, knowledge sharing, and adopting best practices among cities within the Greater Bay Area. For instance, Foshan has actively participated in regional forums, workshops, and joint projects focusing on green infrastructure planning, low-carbon transportation, and urban resilience (Foshan et al. Bureau, 2022).

Figure 4. Relationship between Foshan's Initiatives, Sustainable Urban Development, and Regional Integration

Figure 4 illustrates the interconnected relationship between Foshan's green urban planning and infrastructure initiatives, sustainable urban development, and regional integration within the Greater Bay Area.

Foshan's approach to sustainable urban development and regional integration is grounded in the theories of regional planning, urban ecology, and collaborative governance, which emphasize the importance of coordinated efforts, cross-jurisdictional cooperation, and stakeholder engagement in addressing complex urban and environmental challenges (Healey, 2006; Innes & Booher, 2010; Wu, 2014).

While Foshan has made significant progress in promoting sustainable urban development and contributing to regional integration, challenges include coordinating policies and regulations across different jurisdictions, securing long-term funding and resources, and addressing potential conflicts between economic growth and environmental protection (Shen et al., 2017). Nonetheless, Foshan's efforts serve as a valuable example for other cities in the Greater Bay Area and beyond, demonstrating the potential for creating sustainable, livable, and integrated urban regions through collaborative and forward-thinking approaches.

2. Knowledge sharing and best practices

Foshan's pioneering efforts in green urban planning and eco-friendly infrastructure development have positioned the city as a valuable source of knowledge and best practices for other municipalities within the Greater Bay Area. This knowledge exchange aligns with collaborative governance and regional cooperation principles, emphasizing the importance of sharing experiences, resources, and innovative solutions to address complex challenges (Ansell & Gash, 2008; Emerson et al., 2012).

Through various regional networks and platforms, Foshan actively participates in knowledge-sharing initiatives, workshops, and joint projects focused on sustainable urban development. For instance, Foshan has been an active member of the Greater Bay Area Green Cities Alliance, a collaborative network established to exchange best practices, policies, and technologies related to environmental protection and urban sustainability (Greater et al. Alliance, 2020).

One notable example of Foshan's knowledge-sharing efforts is the "Green Foshan" initiative. This comprehensive program showcases the city's achievements in green building, eco-mobility, and urban resilience. Through this initiative, Foshan has hosted study tours, seminars, and training sessions for urban planners, policymakers, and industry professionals from other cities in the Greater Bay Area (Foshan et al. Bureau, 2021).

Table 5. "Green Foshan" Knowledge-Sharing Activities (2018-2022)

Year Study Tours Hosted Seminars/Workshops Participants Cities Represented

2018 5 3 250 6

2019 8 5 350 8

2020 6 4 300 7

2021 10 6 400 9

2022 12 8 500 10

Source: Foshan Green Development Bureau, 2023)

Table 5 provides data on the participation and knowledge-sharing activities facilitated by Foshan through the "Green Foshan" initiative from 2018 to 2022.

In addition to hosting events and initiatives, Foshan has actively contributed to developing regional guidelines, policies, and frameworks for sustainable urban development. For instance, Foshan's experiences and best practices have been incorporated into the Greater Bay Area Green Building Standards and the Greater Bay Area Sustainable Transportation Strategy (Greater et al. Plan, 2019).

Figure 5. Relationship between Foshan's Initiatives, Knowledge Sharing, and Regional Sustainable Development

Figure 5 illustrates the interconnected relationship between Foshan's green urban planning and infrastructure initiatives, knowledge sharing, and promoting best practices within the Greater Bay Area.

Foshan's approach to knowledge sharing and promoting best practices is grounded in the theories of organizational learning, knowledge management, and policy transfer, which emphasize the importance of collaboration, knowledge exchange, and the diffusion of innovative practices across organizations and regions (Argote & Miron-Spektor, 2011; Dolowitz & Marsh, 2000; Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).

While Foshan has made significant contributions to knowledge-sharing and the promotion of best practices, challenges remain, such as ensuring the effective adaptation and contextualization of practices to local contexts, addressing potential resistance or barriers to knowledge transfer, and sustaining long-term collaboration and knowledge-sharing networks (Argote & Fahrenkopf, 2016; Stone, 2017). Nonetheless, Foshan's efforts serve as a valuable example for other cities in the Greater Bay Area and beyond, demonstrating the potential for accelerating sustainable urban development through collaborative knowledge sharing and disseminating best practices.

Summary

Foshan, a key city in the Greater Bay Area of China, has been at the forefront of implementing green urban planning strategies and eco-friendly infrastructure to promote sustainable development and environmental protection. The city's efforts focus on sustainable transportation, green spaces and parks, and eco-friendly infrastructure (Li et al., 2019; Wang & Chen, 2020; Foshan Bureau, 2021).

Foshan has implemented a comprehensive sustainable transportation plan, including the expansion of its metro system, the development of non-motorized transportation infrastructure, and the integration of intelligent technology to optimize transportation networks (Li et al., 2019; Wang & Chen, 2020). The city has also incorporated green spaces and parks into its urban planning initiatives, adopting the concept of "sponge city" to maximize rainwater retention and infiltration (Wang et al., 2019). These green spaces provide numerous environmental and social benefits, such as reducing air pollution, mitigating urban heat island effects, and improving mental health and well-being (Li & Song, 2019; Gascon et al., 2015; Carrus et al., 2015).

Furthermore, Foshan has integrated eco-friendly principles into its urban infrastructure development, aligning with green infrastructure and low-impact development (Ahern, 2007; Dietz, 2007). The city has developed a comprehensive green infrastructure network, including urban greenways, eco-friendly transportation infrastructure, and water management systems (Foshan Bureau, 2021; Tan et al., 2019).

Foshan's efforts to promote sustainable urban development contribute to the overall sustainability and resilience of the Greater Bay Area. The city actively participates in regional knowledge-sharing initiatives and has positioned itself as a valuable source of best practices for other regional municipalities (Greater Bay Area Alliance, 2020; Foshan Bureau, 2021).

In conclusion, Foshan's green urban planning strategies and eco-friendly infrastructure development are models for other Greater Bay Area cities, demonstrating the potential for creating sustainable, livable, and integrated urban regions through collaborative and forward-thinking approaches.

References

Ahern, J. (2007). Green infrastructure for cities: The spatial dimension. In V. Novotny & P. Brown (Eds.), Cities of the future: Towards integrated sustainable water and landscape management (pp. 267–283). IWA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780401621

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Argote, L., & Fahrenkopf, E. (2016). Knowledge transfer in organizations: The members' roles, tasks, tools, and networks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.003

Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From knowledge experience. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123-1137. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621

Beatley, T. (2000). Green urbanism: Learning from European cities. Island Press.

Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., Agrimi, M., Portoghesi, L., Semenzato, P., & Sanesi, G. (2015). Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022

Dietz, M. E. (2007). Low-impact development practices: Review current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 186(1-4), pp. 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z

Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy‐making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Forman, R. T. (2014). Urban ecology: Science of cities. Cambridge University Press.

Foshan Cultural Affairs Bureau. (2020). Foshan Historic District Revitalization Plan 2020-2025. https://whj.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/zcfg/

Foshan Education Bureau. (2022a). Foshan Environmental Education Action Plan 2022. https://jy.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/zfbgswj/

Foshan Education Bureau. (2022b). School-based environmental education programs in Foshan (2018-2022) [Data set].

Foshan Education Bureau. (2023). Foshan Environmental Education Annual Report 2022. https://jy.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/zfbgswj/

Foshan Environmental Protection Bureau. (2021a). Foshan Public Participation in Environmental Protection Plan 2021-2025. https://hbj.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/zcfg/

Foshan Environmental Protection Bureau. (2021b). Public participation initiatives for environmental protection in Foshan.

Foshan Environmental Protection Bureau. (2022). Foshan Air and Water Quality Monitoring Report 2021. https://hbj.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/qhjbg/

Foshan Green Development Bureau. (2023). Foshan Green Development Annual Report 2022. https://ghhbj.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/qhjbg/

Foshan Municipal Transportation Bureau. (2021a). Annual Report on Smart Transportation Solutions in Foshan. Foshan, China: Foshan Municipal Transportation Bureau.

Foshan Municipal Transportation Bureau. (2021b). Foshan Transportation Development Report 2020.

Foshan Municipal Transportation Bureau. (2021c). Sustainable transportation initiatives in Foshan [Statistical data].

Foshan Transportation Bureau. (2020). Foshan Sustainable Transportation Development Plan (2020-2025). https://jt.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/zcfg/

Foshan Transportation Bureau. (2022). Foshan Non-Motorized Transportation Development Plan 2022-2027. https://jt.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/zcfg/

Foshan Urban Planning Bureau. (2021a). "Green Foshan" Knowledge Sharing Initiative. https://ghj.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/zcfg/

Foshan Urban Planning Bureau. (2021b). Foshan Green Infrastructure Master Plan 2035. https://ghj.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/ghgh/

Foshan Urban Planning Bureau. (2021c). Foshan urban planning and development report 2020.

Foshan Urban Planning Bureau. (2021d). Green Foshan initiative: Showcasing sustainable urban development practices.

Foshan Urban Planning Bureau. (2022). Foshan Green Urban Development Annual Report 2021. https://ghj.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/qhjbg/

Foshan Urban Renewal Bureau. (2021a). Foshan Urban Renewal Master Plan 2021-2035. https://cxju.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/ghgh/

Foshan Urban Renewal Bureau. (2021b). Urban renewal program in Foshan: Enhancing quality of life and livability.

Foshan Urban Renewal Bureau. (2022). Foshan Urban Renewal Annual Report 2021. https://cxju.foshan.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/qhjbg/

Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2015). Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(4), 4354-4379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120404354

Greater Bay Area Green Cities Alliance. (2020a). Collaborative network for sustainable urban development in the Greater Bay Area.

Greater Bay Area Green Cities Alliance. (2020b). Greater Bay Area Green Cities Alliance Annual Report 2019. https://www.gd.gov.cn/zwgk/wjk/qbwj/ysk/

Greater Bay Area Green Cities Alliance. (2020c). Greater Bay Area Green Cities Development Report 2019.

Greater Bay Area Integrated Development Plan. (2019). https://www.gd.gov.cn/zwgk/wjk/qbwj/ysk/

Healey, P. (2006). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge.

Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behaviour through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge.

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally, and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Leyden, K. M., Goldberg, A., & Michelbach, P. (2011). Understanding the pursuit of happiness in ten major cities. Urban Affairs Review, 47(6), 861-888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411403120

Li, D., & Song, X. (2019). Green space and ecosystem services: A critical review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4296.

Li, F., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Zhao, D., Liu, H., Zhou, C., & Wang, R. (2019). Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: Identification based on graph theory and gravity modelling. Landscape and Urban Planning, pp. 189, 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.

Li, J., & Song, Y. (2019). Impacts of greening on urban heat island effect: A Foshan, China case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.220

Li, J., Zhang, L., & Liu, Y. (2019). Sustainable transportation development in Foshan, China: A case study of metro system expansion. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 145(3), 04019013.

Li, J., Zhang, Y., & Chen, W. (2019). The impact of metro expansion on sustainable transportation in Foshan. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 145(3), 04019018.

Lowe, M., Whitzman, C., Badland, H., Davern, M., Hes, D., Aye, L., & Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Liveable, healthy, sustainable: What are the critical indicators for Melbourne neighbourhoods? University of Melbourne. https://doi.org/10.26188/5556616

McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Promoting sustainable behaviour: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00183

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.

Raphael, D., Renwick, R., Brown, I., Steinmetz, B., Sehdev, H., & Phillips, S. (2008). Making the links between community structure and individual well-being: Community quality of life in Riverdale, Toronto, Canada. Health & Place, 14(4), 764-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.014

Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014

Shen, L. Y., Peng, Y., Zhang, X., & Wu, Y. (2011). An alternative model for evaluating sustainable urbanization. Cities, 28(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.002

Shen, L., Zhou, J., Skitmore, M., & Xia, B. (2017). Sustainable urbanization challenges in China: An overview for eco-city development. In L. Shen, J. Zhou, & M. Skitmore (Eds.), Urban Eco-Urbanism in Singapore: Learning from Suzhou (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6608-3_1

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

Stone, D. (2017). Understanding the transfer of policy failure: Bricolage, experimentalism, and translation. Policy & Politics, 45(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14748914738224

Tan, P. Y., Zhang, J., Masoudi, M., Alemu, J. B., Edwards, P. J., Grêt-Regamey, A., Richards, D. R., Saunders, J., Song, X. P., & Wong, L. W. (2019). A conceptual framework to untangle the concept of urban ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, p. 200, 103837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103837

Tan, P. Y., Zhang, J., Xie, X., Cai, X., & Guo, H. (2019). Exploring the green infrastructure network pattern and eco-service value in Foshan City, China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 145(4), 05019015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000538

Timmer, V., & Seymour, N. K. (2005). The livable city. The World Urban Economic and Environmental Development Encounter, pp. 1–17.

UN-Habitat. (2016). Urbanization and development: Emerging futures. World Cities Report 2016. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

Wang, H., & Chen, L. (2020). Promoting non-motorized transportation through bike-sharing: A case study of Foshan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101876.

Wang, H., Mei, C., Liu, J., & Shao, W. (2019). A new strategy for integrated urban water management in China: Sponge City. Science China Technological Sciences, 62(3), 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9185-3

Wang, J., & Chen, Y. (2020). Bicycle-sharing systems in China: Characteristics, challenges, and prospects. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102510

Wang, Q., & Chen, S. (2020). Promoting sustainable transportation through bike-sharing: The case of Foshan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102349.

Wang, X., Li, Z., & Guo, H. (2019). Implementing the sponge city concept in Foshan: Opportunities and challenges. Water, 11(8), 1700.

Wang, Y., Wang, Z., & Liu, J. (2019). Sponge City construction in China: A state-of-the-art review. Water, 11(1), 93.

Wu, J. (2014). Urban ecology and sustainability: The state-of-the-science and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning, pp. 125, 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018

Zheng, H. W., Shen, G. Q., & Wang, H. (2017). A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat International, 66, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.05.005

Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Lai, K. K., Zhao, F., Wang, S., & Li, P. (2020). Challenges and countermeasures for the development of eco-cities in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, p. 61, 102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102287