Formula 1 and synthetic fuels
“As you know today, the price [of sustainable fuel] is much higher, but F1 has been always very good in speeding up the process and helping technology to go in the right direction. So that's really what I'm expecting, and I'm sure that everyone will work in this direction." Stefano Domenicali for Autosport
Motorsport serves as a laboratory for innovation. The rapid pace of races and the relentless pursuit of excellence create an ideal environment for the development of many advancements, such as turbochargers and seatbelts.
However, the statement from Stefano's Autosport interview is not about technology; it pertains to energy. The constraints of thermodynamic laws will always prevent a combustion engine from being as efficient as an electric vehicle, regardless of technological innovation.
Synthetic fuel refers to hydrocarbons made from CO2 and H2O through a human-engineered process that requires significant energy input to split carbon dioxide and water molecules into carbon and hydrogen. These elements are then recombined into compounds like C8H18 to produce gasoline identical to that derived from fossil fuels.
Interestingly, fossil fuels are created through a similar process known as photosynthesis, which we learn about in school. Photosynthesis breaks the bonds between CO2 and H2O, producing various hydrocarbons (some as simple as sugars) that, over millions of years under heat and pressure, transform into the fossil fuels we extract and use today.
When considering plant-based fuels like ethanol or biodiesel, the process is essentially the same as that of synthetic fuels, but performed by nature rather than in a factory. The advantage is that these processes do not increase atmospheric CO2 levels. They utilize CO2 from the atmosphere and release it back when the fuel is burned, resulting in a net neutral effect. While there are some emissions of nitrous oxides, the primary concern remains the carbon-based greenhouse gases.
Brazil’s ethanol industry already exemplifies Stefano’s point. The country produces zero-carbon fuel from sugarcane (and corn) at very low costs, outperforming any synthetic fuel produced globally.
The issue with Stefano's statement is that the cost limitation of synthetic fuel is inherently tied to energy production and combustion efficiencies. These factors are not influenced by current Formula 1 advancements, meaning no significant improvements will arise beyond the marketing hype generated by such claims.
Nevertheless, the importance of synthetic and biofuels cannot be overstated. They will be crucial for aviation and other applications, and the world will require every possible innovation to create a matrix of low-carbon energy sources to power the future of humanity.
Lucas Di Grassi
领英推荐
The complement below is an A.I. factual check on this article and its sources. Please read as a supplement:
Efficiency of Combustion Engines vs. Electric Vehicles
It's accurate that electric vehicles (EVs) are more energy-efficient than internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. ICE vehicles waste a significant portion of their energy (around 75-84%) primarily through heat, whereas EVs lose only about 31-35% of their energy, including losses during battery charging and drivetrain inefficiencies (MotorTrend) (Petro Online). This inherent efficiency advantage is due to the direct conversion of electrical energy to motion in EVs, compared to the numerous energy loss processes in combustion engines.
Synthetic Fuels and Energy Efficiency
Synthetic fuels, created by combining hydrogen and carbon dioxide, indeed mimic the chemical composition of fossil fuels. While they offer a carbon-neutral potential when produced using renewable energy, their overall efficiency is considerably lower compared to direct electricity use in EVs. The process of creating synthetic fuels is energy-intensive, with significant energy losses occurring during production. The total pathway efficiency for synthetic fuels can be as low as 16%, compared to around 72% for electric vehicles (Road to Renewable) (eFUEL-TODAY).
Environmental Impact and Practicality
Synthetic fuels do not inherently increase atmospheric CO2 levels because they recycle CO2 from the atmosphere. However, their production must rely on renewable energy to maintain this benefit; otherwise, the use of fossil-based grid electricity can negate their environmental advantages (Petro Online) (Road to Renewable). Additionally, the current production capacity of synthetic fuels is limited, making it impractical to replace a significant portion of fossil fuel usage in the near future. They might only cover a small fraction of the vehicle fleet by 2035 (Road to Renewable) (Evening Standard).
Application and Future Prospects
Synthetic and biofuels will be essential for sectors like aviation, where battery technology still faces significant challenges in terms of energy density and weight. However, for general road transportation, EVs present a more immediate and efficient solution (Evening Standard).
Conclusion
While the potential of synthetic fuels is noteworthy, their efficiency and current production limitations make them less viable than EVs for mainstream automotive use. The assertion that Formula 1 advancements will significantly impact the efficiency or cost-effectiveness of synthetic fuels is not supported by current technological constraints and market realities. Synthetic fuels will likely play a complementary role, especially in sectors where direct electrification is less feasible.
Business Development Expert - Fleet Solutions - SaaS - Digital Innovation - Net Zero
7 个月Synthetic fuels are well understood. Where do you get the energy to produce sufficient volume at low cost? Using expensive energy to produce cheap fuel is an unviable business model at the moment. Wind and solar is niether cheap nor abundant.
Founder - Solar Rollers Education Program
7 个月Well said, it "is not about technology; it pertains to energy. The constraints of thermodynamic laws will always prevent a combustion engine from being as efficient as an electric vehicle, regardless of technological innovation." It is vital that everyday people start to understand that energy is the currency, not dollars or politics or specific technologies or bling. We strive to spread this message to high school teams through Solar Rollers and look forward to advancements - especially in efficiency.
Commercial Environnemental en diesel synthétique (XTL)chez ROMANO ENERGY
7 个月Un grand merci à ROMANO ENERGY SAM pour leur contribution à la réduction significative des émissions de CO2 lors des événements automobiles et sportifs ??. Leur dévouement, démontré lors des divers Grands Prix (Monaco et Paul Ricard), prouve l’avenir durable et responsable du sport auto. ???????#Sustainable #DieselSynthétique #EssenceSynthétique #GES
Founder at Mercados Renovables SRL Renewable Energy Entrepreneur and Biogas-Biomethane-H2 Business Developer
7 个月Lucas Di Grassi we must think that until we reach the massive electrification, our generation has the ethical commitment to cover the gap between the current state of the art and future claims of mass electrification. 200 years ago, humans used solid fuels to obtain their energy; in the last century, liquid fuels were the stars, although they were no less polluting in terms of carbon emitions. Today, we are witnessing the era of gases, much less harmful in GHG′s and much more affordable than the fuels used in the past. Currently there are numerous lines of research that work in the direction of taking advantage of the sources of methane generation (both fossil and biological) to obtain a whole range of useful molecules for daily life, from fuels to fertilizers. In parallel to the lines of research that go into the synthesis of fuels as mentioned here, there are others that go into the design of devices (such as flex engines for example) that allow the use of ethanol or methane as molecules. simple obtained from nature. Promoting these technologies implies, in one way or another, covering that gap to which I referred previously. Sometimes the innovative must intersect with the practical so that an improving option can be feasible.
New Business Ventures Manager | Innovation & Business Strategy | Value Building
7 个月EVs are more efficient after manufacturing, but if we account life cycle efficiency, from manufacturing to discarding, it is still quite disputable with current battery technology and market dynamics, which have been showing that cannot be underestimated. Concerning plant based ethanol, IMHO it is the current ‘premium’ solution when emissions are concerned, Brazil’s experience shows it is viable in Brazil’s scale, but it was never tried in global scale, which brings to me a disturbing question: the technology was there all the time, so why so many people had put all that effort in developing and marketing a significantly more complex solution, as is the case of EVs, instead of trying something simpler, effective, and immediately available? Should we follow the money?