The Forgotten Man

The Forgotten Man

Opinion:

I am going to throw my thoughts out on a topic I usually don't discuss, which is domestic policy, in the attempts of trying to better understand the political landscape of the United States. I want to hear your thoughts and constructive criticism, so please comment! (Especially since my specialty is international affairs, so domestic affairs are a bit foreign to me, no pun intended.)

To start off, take a minute to read this excerpt describing "The Forgotten Man":

" ...Now comes the question: Who pays for it all? The system of plundering each other soon destroys all that it deals with. It produces nothing. Wealth comes only from production, and all that the wrangling grabbers, loafers, and jobbers get to deal with comes from somebody's toil and sacrifice. Who, then, is he who provides it all? Go and find him and you will have once more before you the Forgotten Man. You will find him hard at work because he has a great many to support. Nature has done a great deal for him in giving him fertile soil and excellent climate and he wonders why it is that his scale of comfort is so moderate. He has to get out of the soil enough to pay all his taxes, and that means the cost of all the jobs and the fund for all the plunder. The Forgotten Man is delving away in patient industry, supporting his family, paying his taxes, casting his vote, supporting the church and the school, reading his newspaper, and cheering for the politician of his admiration, but he is the only one for whom there is no provision in the great scramble and the big divide.
Such is the Forgotten Man. He works, he votes, generally he prays-- but he always pays--yes, above all, he pays. He does not want an office; his name never gets into the newspaper except when he gets married or dies. He keeps production going on. He contributes to the strength of parties. He is flattered before election. He is strongly patriotic... He may grumble occasionally to his wife and family, but he does not frequent the grocery or talk politics at the tavern. Consequently, he is forgotten. He is a commonplace man. He gives no trouble. He excites no admiration... Therefore, he is forgotten."

The 'Forgotten Man' is a term that's been used by FDR, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump. This is the man who they have talked over the voices of the media to directly address. All three were brilliant in doing this because they recognized the desire of this man to be heard. i believe every election cycle has a Forgotten Man of sorts, but the Forgotten Man of these specific different time periods share similarities.

Specifically with regards to the Forgotten Man of recent history, it seems economics played a big role. Without getting too technical, important points to note are that:

  • 214 counties nation-wide (7%) had recovered in 2014 to pre-recession levels on the basis of total employment, unemployment rate, size of economy, and median home values. (only 7%!)
  • When oil prices dropped in 2014 and then again in 2016, big blows were made to the American manufacturing sector, which is primarily in rural areas of the United States - where the "Forgotten Man" of today primarily is. Recovery that had been made staggered.

I believe that the Forgotten Man of our time, today, felt forgotten in the wake of the 2016 Presidential Election because of:

  • The sudden increase in Obamacare premiums
  • Banking restrictions (and over-regulation) on small businesses
  • Clean power initiatives, which had good intentions, but ended up accelerating the demise of the coal economy
  • Manufacturing plant closings
  • Close to zero interest earnings on savings
  • Immigration (much can be discussed on this topic so I'll stop there)

For the Forgotten Man to be heard, I believe this is what is at the heart of policy changes they want:

  • Replace Affordable Care Act
  • Revise Dodd-Frank
  • Push for Higher Interest Rates
  • Reform Environmental Regulation
  • Clarify, Simplify, and Stick to Revised Immigration Policy
  • Renegotiate NAFTA and other Trade Treaties
  • Less Regulation and Federal Government Interference on a Local Level

I am speaking abstractly and removed here, but I identify with the Forgotten Man in that many of my family members and friends have been affected by the above aspects I have mentioned. I am trying to put into simple language and speak over the "crazies." The Forgotten Men I know are not racist, sexist, homophobic, etc etc... (Really, who are these people?) I really believe the essence of voters who feel unheard stems from changes in the economy and local-level domestic issues. What are your thoughts?

Bhushan N. Vaidya

Seasoned Program Management Executive

8 年

Excellent article. Its interesting how you make the linkage between FDR, Pres. Reagan, and Pres. Trump. Remarkably FDR, in the Great Depression, inherited an even bigger and more vexing problem than Ronald Reagan had to deal with when he took office. The oil shocks of the 70s notwithstanding, 'stagflation' was actually an economic malaise that Reagan and Paul Volcker managed to tame as there wasn't much wrong with the economy structurally, though some would argue that 14-18% interest rates are more damaging to real economic growth than say, an 8-9% unemployment rate. Then again, the data is skewed by the frame of reference and how long of a window one chooses to examine. Indeed the country's come a long way from the 1930s' dark days with 25% unemployment, long lines at soup kitchens and perennial miseries of the Dust Bowl. But today, we seldom remember what it ACTUALLY took for the US to crawl out of that hole. Only in the early '50s, over 18 years after the New Deal became law, did tangible financial benefits and long-term structural changes begin to take shape. These then percolated down to the common man, the 'forgotten man', in the form of a home construction and interstate commerce boom. Its a refreshing lesson in American history, with many parallels to what we face today, about instituting policy via Presidential decree Vs actually making it work as intended. I live in Houston, and the pain from nearly 3 years of the oil slump is being acutely felt in the Bayou city. Full recovery still seems far away. Many in the oil & gas industry have reconciled themselves to 'lower for longer'. The previous administration had no vision for energy; not only how crucial it is to GDP growth, but how accurate of a barometer it is of our spending on Construction, Infrastructure and Manufacturing. The energy industry, and energy jobs, fuel everything, not the other way round! Obama killed the Keystone XL pipeline (well, almost until POTUS revived it) mainly because they refused to pay toll. Our loss, Canada's gain - Trans-Canada eventually found a way to reroute the crude to Quebec, AND found new buyers in Asia. A big deal the media hardly ever mentions is that US is now exporting surplus LNG (since Feb. 2016), competing head-on with Qatar, Russia and Australia! The disastrous policies of the past 8 years left us in a perilous state vis-a-vis international trade, our national debt, and with regard to a sound domestic economic policy. In doggedly pursuing the ACA, they displayed shortsightedness and scant regard to laying out a solid foundation for this century. Hopefully future generations don't judge these 20-25 years as how America gave it all away to the Chinese. JD Vance in "Hillbilly Elegy" makes a similar case about hollowing out of the US industrial base, loss of well-paying manufacturing jobs, and a steady grinding decline in the standard of living in middle America. Hopefully the new sheriff is listening.

William Harrison

ITSM Solution SME - ServiceNow Business Process Consultant (BPC)

8 年

Kelsie Wendelberger --- Interesting read…and it made me think of the following: “Though liberty is established by law, we must be vigilant, for liberty to enslave us is always present under that very liberty. Our Constitution speaks of the "general welfare of the people." Under that phrase all sorts of excesses can be employed by lusting tyrants to make us bondsmen” (Marcus Tullius Cicero, circa 50 BC). In my opinion, you have made it sound as if the Forgotten Man is owed some debt of gratitude or pity; yet, I think it is “the people” that have forgotten their duty to remain liberated…in other words, the forgotten man has shirked his duty by being distracted by thinking they have to live certain way, shoulder unlawful tax burdens and just accept things as they are. The nation blindly votes for someone and thinks their duty is over. Then they just accept all of the nefarious bologna that comes from government as if we are the ones that are beholding to those officials that were elected --- isn’t it supposed to be a government of “…we the people..?” Unfortunately, that seems to have been forgotten and the majority just lay down and play dead while the D.C. folks continue to trample collective freedom, deny liberty and shackle any hope of happiness --- and it is probably our collective fault.

Andrew Seidman

Videogame Designer / Cryptocurrency Investor at Colorspray. Nice to meet you! "I will work with anybody to do good, and nobody to do evil." --Frederick Douglass

8 年

Dear Ms. Wendelberger: I caught your post attempting to provide clarity and honesty regarding the inauguration photo controversy. Such an attempt at honesty is remarkable and refreshing in this political climate, and worthy of support, and I thank you for it. (Indeed, in many ways I wish that you were currently working within the White House instead of those who offered us "alternative facts" - both the phrase and the information it refers to.) Undeniably, the Democrats' write-off of the blue-collar, manufacturing, and working-class voting blocs in general was the turning point on which the election hinged - that and the fact that they overlooked their own populist, economic-reformist candidate (Sanders) in the rush to anoint an ostensibly centrist and "more popular" candidate who turned out to have been suffering from deep honesty and integrity issues all the way down the line, from faking her own Twitter numbers to presenting a different face in public and in private to "recruiting" news organizations to present her with favorable, biased coverage - the list goes on and on. Unfortunately, there is one issue on which I cannot agree with you in this article - the composite"Forgotten Man" I have met in our era, while undeniably "delving away in patient industry, supporting his family, paying his taxes, [and] casting his vote", is in our era more often racist, sexist, and homophobic than I would like. From the vicious racism I saw emerge during the 2008 and 2012 campaigns to the still-omnipresent use of the word "gay" in America to mean instead "weak" or "un-masculine" to the ugly misogyny of, say, Gamergate - I have seen far more examples of bigotry and prejudice taking root among the working classes of America than I would ever have liked or dreamed to see in recent years, and am sadder for it. I had a very deep respect for my grandfather, Bill Seidman, former Chairman of the FDIC under Reagan and a personal friend of Gerald Ford's - because in his era, it seemed to me that the Republican Party put the politics and business of running the country and making it secure first and foremost, and all other concerns and prejudices a distant second. I fear that some of that has been lost in recent decades in the rush to populism, even as successful a stratagem politically as it has proven to be. I also hope that responsible public officials such as yourself will not forget the other bloc of issues that made a difference to this election - the needs of young voters who eschewed the Clinton campaign, and who did not flock to Trump directly but still hope that either he or upcoming Administrations will address: * the staggering and unfair costs of any four-year American degree worth having, and the broader implications these costs have for income inequality in the long term * the shockingly low wages for working millenials - the lowest in decades, by my analysis, in real purchasing power parity terms * the dangers both military and economic posed by any foreign policy that destabilizes or plays sides in critical regions, particularly the Middle East * the continuing dominance of our governing process by certain private corporations with a dubious ethical record, which continue under this Administration and represent my own greatest fears on the subject - in particular, Exxon and Goldman Sachs I would enjoy a correspondence with you on these issues if you are interested. You seem to possess a capacity to cut to the root of the issues you address in a concise, honest, and intelligent way that I feel is rarely seen in governance today. Sincerely, FA Seidman

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kelsie Wendelberger的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了