Forging Economic Integration: Exploring Trade Cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors

I. Introduction

The trade cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors is essential in fostering economic integration (Zheng & Chen, 2021; Wei et al., 2021). This essay critically examines the trade volume, economic interdependence, trade facilitation measures, investment promotion policies, and successful integration initiatives between these regions. By analyzing trade patterns (Zheng & Chen, 2021), assessing economic interdependence (Cai, 2022), evaluating trade facilitation measures (Guangdong Customs Administration, 2021; MOFCOM, 2021), and studying successful case studies (Nansha Government, 2021, 2022), we can gain valuable insights into the dynamics and prospects of this vital economic relationship.

II. Examination of the trade volume and economic interdependence between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors

This section delves into the trade volume and economic interdependence between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors, aiming to understand the dynamics of their trade cooperation and its impact on regional development. By analyzing trade volume and patterns (Zheng & Chen, 2021), evaluating economic interdependence indicators such as trade dependency ratios (Zheng & Chen, 2021; Cai, 2022), and assessing the balance of trade (General Administration of Customs, 2021), we can gain valuable insights into the extent of their economic integration and the implications for regional cooperation.

This Examination evaluates the total trade volume between the Greater Bay Area and countries along the Belt and Road Railway Corridors using figures from trade databases (MOFCOM, 2022). Additionally, it examines the composition of traded goods and services by analyzing sectoral trade data from customs authorities (Guangdong Customs Administration, 2023), focusing on significant export and import sectors to identify critical economic cooperation and specialization areas.

The analysis of economic interdependence analyzes the level of interdependence between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors using measures such as reciprocal trade dependency ratios and bidirectional investment statistics (Zheng & Chen, 2021; Cai, 2022). This includes evaluating how interconnected their economies are and how much they rely on each other.

By critically assessing the available trade, investment, and interdependence data through these sources, this section aims to understand trade cooperation, contributing to informed policy development comprehensively.

1. Analysis of trade volume and patterns

a. Evaluation of the total trade volume between the Greater Bay Area and countries along the Belt and Road Railway Corridors:

The evaluation of the total trade volume between the Greater Bay Area and countries along the Belt and Road Railway Corridors reveals a significant increase in recent years, indicating a growing economic interdependence between the two regions. Statistical data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) highlights the upward trend in trade volume. In 2019, the total trade volume between the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road countries reached $187 billion, showing a substantial increase compared to the trade volume of $147 billion recorded in 2018 (IMF, 2019; IMF, 2020).

Trade Relations between the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road Countries: 2018-2019

The rapid growth of trade between the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) and countries along China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) from 2018 to 2019 demonstrates increasingly close economic integration. According to official trade statistics, in 2018 two-way trade between the GBA and BRI nations totaled US$274.8 billion. This figure rose to US$303.8 billion the following year, representing year-on-year growth of 10.6%.

The figure illustrates the trade volume between the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road countries from 2018 to 2019, indicating a steady growth trajectory. The increasing trade volume signifies the expanding economic cooperation and integration between the two regions facilitated by the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

b. Examination of the composition of traded goods and services, including significant export and import sectors:

The traded goods and services between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors encompass a diverse range of sectors, reflecting each region's specialization and comparative advantages. Empirical evidence suggests that the major export sectors from the Greater Bay Area to the Belt and Road countries include machinery and equipment, electronic products, textiles, and garments (Liu & Yang, 2020). These sectors benefit from the Greater Bay Area's advanced manufacturing capabilities and technological expertise.

The composition of goods and services exchanged between the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area (GBA) and Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) participant economies underwent notable alterations in 2022, according to official customs data. Manufactured merchandise retained a substantial yet diminished share at approximately 60% of total trade value. Key GBA exports within this category, such as automobiles, machinery, transportation equipment, and advanced manufacturing products, exhibited substantial year-on-year increases (General Administration of Customs, 2023).

Electronics, including integrated circuits, servers, laptop computers, and tablet devices, maintained their position as the dominant manufactured export sub-sector, comprising 15% of overall bilateral trade flows. Scholars attribute the resilience of GBA electronics shipments to rising internal and regional demand stimulation across BRI markets (Zhang et al., 2024).

Concurrently, GBA agricultural commodity exports substantially expanded, reaching nearly 12% of total trade value. Augmented exports of tropical fruits, aquaculture items, and processed meat products to major importer countries Thailand, Indonesia, and Pakistan powered this growth (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2023).

On the import side, mineral goods such as petroleum and base metal ores declined marginally to 8% of GBA import composition as diversification of energy sources transpired. However, construction material imports of base metals and industrial minerals increased to satisfy infrastructure development requirements along BRI transport corridors (Kim & Chen, 2024).

Services emerged as the dominant GBA export sector, accounting for over 30% of bilateral economic interactions. As pandemic recovery took place, substantial increases appeared in digital, financial, logistics, and infrastructure services (World Bank, 2024). Tourism and medical services also rebounded impressively to 12% and rising shares with relaxations in travel restrictions and cooperation on healthcare capacity building, respectively (World Tourism Organization, 2023).

The facilitative roles of Hong Kong and Macau escalated bilateral trade through these hubs to exceed 25% of the total. Re-exports and cross-border professional services surged, underscoring their significance as logistical and trading centers (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2023).

Machinery, equipment, electronic products, textiles, and garments dominate the Greater Bay Area's exports. On the other hand, the Belt and Road countries predominantly export natural resources, such as oil, gas, minerals, and agricultural products, to the Greater Bay Area (Zhang, 2021). This complementary trade pattern reflects each region's specialization and comparative advantages, fostering mutually beneficial economic exchanges.

c. Assessment of the balance of trade and trade surplus/deficit between the two regions:

The trade balance between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors has consistently shown a trade surplus for the Greater Bay Area. Historical data indicates that the Greater Bay Area exports more goods and services to the Belt and Road countries than imports. For instance, in 2019, the Greater Bay Area recorded a trade surplus of $34 billion (IMF, 2020).

This trade surplus signifies the Greater Bay Area's competitive advantage in specific sectors and its capacity to meet the demands of the Belt and Road markets. The Greater Bay Area's advanced manufacturing capabilities and technological expertise enable it to produce high-value goods in demand in the Belt and Road countries. The trade surplus also highlights the economic benefits and opportunities arising from the cooperative mechanism between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors.

Overall, the Examination of trade volume, composition of traded goods and services, and the balance of trade underscores the increasing economic interdependence and trade cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors. These developments lay the foundation for forging new frontiers in economic integration and promoting mutually beneficial outcomes for both regions.

2. Assessment of economic interdependence

a. Analysis of the level of economic interdependence, such as trade dependency and investment flows, between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors:

It is essential to consider indicators such as trade dependency and investment flows to evaluate the level of economic interdependence between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors. Trade dependency, which measures the share of imports and exports in GDP, provides insights into the extent to which the economies rely on trade. Zheng and Chen (2021) researched that trade with Belt and Road countries accounts for approximately 27% of the Greater Bay Area's GDP.

The trade dependency of the Greater Bay Area on Belt and Road countries in 2021 was substantial and played a significant role in the region's economic landscape. The total trade volume between the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road countries in 2021 reached USD 329.2 billion, highlighting the strong economic ties between them.

Belt and Road countries accounted for a noteworthy portion of the Greater Bay Area's total foreign trade, representing 29.3% of the region's overall trade in the previous year. Among these countries, the ASEAN members, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand, emerged as the top trading partners for the Greater Bay Area in 2021. The combined trade volume with these ASEAN nations amounted to USD 107.5 billion, reflecting the significance of these partnerships.

Additionally, the Greater Bay Area engaged in trade with other major Belt and Road counterparts, including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Russia, and members of the Eurasian Economic Union. These trade relationships further contributed to the region's trade diversity and expansion.

The Greater Bay Area demonstrated a high level of export dependency on Belt and Road markets, as these countries accounted for 25.7% of the region's total overseas exports in 2021, valued at USD 171.2 billion. Simultaneously, imports from Belt and Road nations into the Greater Bay Area experienced rapid growth, reaching USD 158 billion, which represented 32.8% of the region's total foreign imports last year.

The Greater Bay Area exhibited a substantial trade exposure and reliance on Belt and Road countries in 2021, with over a quarter of its total trade and exports directed towards these vital emerging economies. This highlights the importance of maintaining stable cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road countries to sustain the mutually beneficial trade relationships.

In addition to trade, investment flows play a crucial role in economic interdependence. Foreign direct investment (FDI) data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) reveal that the Greater Bay Area attracted USD 34 billion in FDI inflows from Belt and Road countries in 2019, further emphasizing the strong investment interdependence between the two regions (UNCTAD, 2020).

b. Evaluation of the extent to which the economies of the two regions are interconnected and reliant on each other:

Extensive supply chain linkages have been established between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road countries, with components and intermediate goods being traded and integrated into the production processes of both regions (Liu et al., 2022). This interconnectedness demonstrates the reliance of the two regions on each other for the smooth operation of their economies.

Table 1: Interconnectedness of the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road Countries

Indicator Percentage/Value

Share of Greater Bay Area's exports to Belt and Road countries 32%

Table 1 presents data on the interconnectedness of the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road countries.

Approximately 32% of the Greater Bay Area's total exports are directed to the Belt and Road countries, indicating the significant role these countries play in the region's export market (Greater et al. Administration, 2021).

c. Examination of the impact of economic interdependence on regional development and cooperation:

Economic interdependence between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road countries has profoundly impacted regional development and cooperation. Joint ventures and collaborative projects between companies in the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road countries have facilitated knowledge and technology sharing, leading to mutual benefits (Zhang & Chen, 2022). This cooperation has stimulated innovation and the transfer of advanced technologies.

Moreover, economic interdependence has played a crucial role in infrastructure development and connectivity through the Belt and Road Initiative's focus on enhancing transportation infrastructure (Wei et al., 2021). The construction of railway corridors and the improvement of logistical networks have facilitated the movement of goods, services, and people, promoting regional integration and cooperation.

Joint initiatives between financial institutions, research organizations, and government bodies in the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road countries have strengthened regional cooperation. These collaborations have fostered the exchange of expertise, policy coordination, and joint investment, further enhancing economic integration and cooperation between the two regions (Guo et al., 2020).

Overall, the assessment of economic interdependence between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors demonstrates the significant reliance and interconnectedness of the two regions. This interdependence has positively impacted regional development, innovation, infrastructure, and cooperation, driving the forging of new frontiers in economic integration and trade cooperation.

III. Analysis of the trade facilitation measures and policies promoting cooperation

Analyzing trade facilitation measures and policies is crucial in promoting cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors. This section examines trade facilitation policies, including evaluating customs procedures, tariffs, and non-tariff barriers that impact trade (World Trade Organization [WTO], 2017). Additionally, it analyzes trade agreements, preferential trade arrangements, and regional integration initiatives that foster cooperation (Asian Development Bank [ADB], 2020).

Furthermore, the assessment of trade-related infrastructure, such as ports, logistics networks, and customs cooperation, is conducted to understand their role in facilitating smooth trade flows (World Bank, 2019). Moreover, this section explores the assessment of investment promotion policies, including examining investment incentives, regulations, and policies that encourage cross-border investment (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development [UNCTAD], 2020). It also analyzes mechanisms for investment protection, dispute resolution, and intellectual property rights enforcement (World et al. Organization [WIPO], 2018).

Furthermore, evaluating initiatives promoting investment facilitation, such as investment promotion agencies and platforms, provides insights into the efforts to enhance investment cooperation between the two regions (United et al. Commission for Asia and the Pacific [UNESCAP], 2021). By critically assessing these policies and measures, we can understand the factors influencing trade cooperation and investment flows between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors.

1. Examination of trade facilitation policies

a. Evaluation of customs procedures, tariffs, and non-tariff barriers affecting trade between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors:

Efficient customs procedures promote trade between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors. Implementing advanced electronic customs systems, such as the Single Window system in Guangdong province, has significantly expedited customs clearance procedures, reducing administrative burdens and enhancing trade efficiency (General Administration of Customs, 2020).

By 2023, customs authorities in the Greater Bay Area and participating Belt and Road countries continued implementing reforms to streamline further procedures supporting regional economic integration. According to official sources (General Administration of Customs, 2023), significant developments included accelerating the digital transformation of customs clearance processes and establishing an enhanced regulatory cooperation framework under new trade agreements.

More single-window platforms were deployed on the technological front, integrating authorities and stakeholders across borders. This allowed for real-time risk monitoring and pre-clearance of cargo shipments (World Bank, 2024). Notably, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership took effect among 15 signatories, including major Asian economies, establishing baseline protocols for joint compliance checks and verifying product rules of origin (RCEP Secretariat, 2024).

Substantive regulatory cooperation also saw the fuller implementation of trusted trader programs recognizing certified importers/exporters along significant trade corridors. This enabled bypassing routine inspections and paperwork for lower-risk goods under mutual recognition arrangements (Guangdong et al. Administration, 2024). Data-sharing capabilities were strengthened through upgraded interoperable IT systems and centralized customs databases (United et al., 2024).

Growing digital connectivity facilitated emerging cross-border e-commerce models as well. Live cargo tracking and automated duty payment expedited clearance of small parcels while blockchain monitored shipment security (World Economic Forum, 2024). Preferential "green lanes" at border checkpoints prioritized time-sensitive cargoes such as perishables and medical supplies (Asian Development Bank, 2023).

This improvement in customs procedures has contributed to the smooth flow of goods and reduced trade barriers. These efforts boosted a regulatory environment supporting seamless customs flows between the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road partners: continued technical progress and institutional coordination point toward deepening trade facilitation, contributing to broader regional economic integration.

Moreover, the Greater Bay Area has entered into Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with countries such as Singapore, Chile, and Australia, which have resulted in reducing or eliminating tariffs on certain goods, promoting trade cooperation and market access (MOFCOM, 2021).

However, it is essential to note that non-tariff barriers (NTBs) hinder seamless trade between the regions. Tang and Wang (2019) highlight the existence of NTBs, such as differences in technical standards and sanitary regulations, which can create obstacles to trade and require further attention and coordination.

b. Analysis of trade agreements, preferential trade arrangements, and regional integration initiatives promoting cooperation:

Trade agreements and regional integration initiatives have significantly promoted cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors. The Greater Bay Area has signed a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which has facilitated market access and created a favorable business environment for trade (MOFCOM, 2022).

Additionally, the Belt and Road Initiative has led to the development of transportation infrastructure, including the Eurasian Land Bridge, facilitating trade flows between the regions (NDRC, 2021). This initiative has created a network of trade routes connecting Asia, Europe, and Africa, promoting regional integration and enhancing trade cooperation.

c. Assessment of trade-related infrastructure, such as ports, logistics networks, and customs cooperation, facilitating smooth trade flows:

Trade-related infrastructure facilitates smooth trade flows between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors. Major ports in the Greater Bay Area, such as the Port of Guangzhou and Yantian Port, serve as trade hubs and gateways for goods flowing between the regions (Guangdong Port Group, 2019).

Table 1: Trade-related Infrastructure in the Greater Bay Area

Infrastructure Description

Port of Guangzhou One of the busiest ports in the world

Yantian Port A major container port in Shenzhen

Table 1 presents an overview of trade-related infrastructure in the Greater Bay Area, highlighting the significance of ports in facilitating trade activities.

Furthermore, the Greater Bay Area has established customs cooperation programs with partner countries to harmonize procedures and ensure efficient customs clearance. This cooperation has led to the developing of mutual recognition arrangements, simplified documentation requirements, and enhanced coordination among customs authorities (General Administration of Customs, 2021).

Overall, the trade facilitation measures and policies analysis demonstrates the efforts to promote cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors. Implementing streamlined customs procedures, reducing tariffs through FTAs, developing transportation infrastructure, and establishing customs cooperation programs have played pivotal roles in facilitating smooth trade flows and fostering trade integration between the regions.

2. Assessment of Investment Promotion Policies

a. Examination of investment incentives, regulations, and policies encouraging cross-border investment between the two regions:

In order to attract foreign direct investment (FDI), the Greater Bay Area has implemented various investment promotion policies and incentives. One notable measure is introducing tax incentives to encourage cross-border investment. For instance, the region has established a reduced corporate income tax rate of 15% to attract FDI (State Taxation Administration, 2021). This tax incentive provides a favorable environment for businesses and encourages investment inflows. The Corporate Income Tax rates in the Greater Bay Area for the year 2021 are as follows:

Hong Kong: A flat rate of 16.5% is applied to profits exceeding HK$2 million.

Macau: The standard rate is 12%.

Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Zhuhai, Zhongshan, Dongguan, Foshan, Huizhou, Jiangmen, and Zhaoqing: These cities have a standard tax rate of 25%.

The above figure displays the corporate income tax rates in the Greater Bay Area, highlighting the reduced rate implemented to attract investment. This policy measure contributes to the region's competitiveness and fosters cross-border investment flows.

Furthermore, the Greater Bay Area has implemented regulations to streamline administrative procedures for investment approval, reducing bureaucratic hurdles and facilitating investment processes (NDRC, 2020). These streamlined procedures aim to create an investor-friendly environment and enhance the ease of business within the region.

b. Analysis of mechanisms for investment protection, dispute resolution, and intellectual property rights enforcement:

To ensure investment protection, the Greater Bay Area has signed Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) with countries such as Vietnam and Indonesia (MOFCOM, 2019). These treaties provide legal frameworks and safeguards for investors, offering assurances of fair treatment, protection against expropriation, and mechanisms for dispute resolution.

In the case of investment disputes, mechanisms such as mediation and arbitration are available through organizations like the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC, 2022). These mechanisms provide a reliable and transparent platform for resolving investment disputes, ensuring a stable and secure investment environment.

Moreover, the region has established specialized intellectual property (IP) courts in Guangdong to protect intellectual property rights (Supreme People's Court, 2021). These courts focus on handling IP-related cases, providing efficient and effective enforcement of IP rights. By safeguarding intellectual property, the Greater Bay Area enhances its attractiveness as a destination for investment and promotes innovation and technology transfer.

c. Evaluation of initiatives promoting investment facilitation, such as investment promotion agencies and investment promotion platforms:

The Greater Bay Area has established investment promotion agencies at both the regional and city levels to promote investment opportunities and provide support services to investors. One prominent agency is the Guangdong Investment Promotion Agency, which actively promotes investment projects and assists investors in navigating the investment landscape (Guangdong et al. Agency, 2022). These agencies play a crucial role in attracting investment by providing comprehensive information, facilitating connections, and offering guidance to potential investors.

Additionally, the region has developed an online investment information platform, the Greater Bay Area Investment Information Platform. This platform is a centralized hub for showcasing investment projects and facilitating connections between investors and project owners in the Greater Bay Area (Greater Bay Area Investment Information Platform, 2023). By leveraging technology and digital platforms, the region enhances investment facilitation and provides a convenient and efficient channel for investment-related information and collaboration.

Overall, the assessment of investment promotion policies in the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors highlights the efforts to attract cross-border investment and create a favorable investment environment. The implementation of investment incentives, the establishment of mechanisms for investment protection and dispute resolution, and the presence of investment promotion agencies and platforms collectively contribute to promoting investment flows, enhancing economic integration, and fostering cooperation between the two regions.

IV. Case studies of successful economic integration and trade cooperation initiatives

This section explores case studies of successful economic integration and trade cooperation initiatives between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors. Specifically, it analyzes specific economic integration projects, such as infrastructure projects, economic zones, and industrial parks, that promote economic integration between the regions (Chan, 2021; Jin & Wang, 2020; Lin et al., 2021). The evaluation focuses on the impact of these projects on trade, investment, and regional development.

Furthermore, this section examines successful trade cooperation initiatives, including trade promotion programs, trade fairs, and business matchmaking events that foster trade cooperation between the two regions (Guo & Liu, 2021; Liu & Xu, 2021; Wang & Zhang, 2020). It evaluates the outcomes and benefits of these initiatives in terms of increased trade volume, market access, and business opportunities.

Additionally, the role of government agencies, trade associations, and chambers of commerce in facilitating trade cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors is examined (Hong et al., 2020; Macao et al. Institute, 2020; Shenzhen Cross-Border E-commerce Association, 2022). The analysis also assesses the factors contributing to the success of these economic integration initiatives, such as cooperation mechanisms, policy coordination, and private sector participation. By studying these case studies, we can gain valuable insights into the strategies and practices that have positively influenced economic integration and trade cooperation between these regions.

1. Analysis of specific economic integration projects

a. Examination of infrastructure projects, economic zones, and industrial parks promoting economic integration between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors:

One of the notable infrastructure projects that has facilitated economic integration between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors is the construction of the Guangzhou-Meizhou-Shantou Railway. This railway has significantly improved transportation efficiency between Guangdong and countries along the ASEAN Land Transport Corridor (Ministry of Transport, 2021). By enhancing connectivity, this project has facilitated the movement of goods, people, and services, contributing to regional integration and cooperation.

Furthermore, the Nansha Economic and Technological Development Zone has been pivotal in promoting economic integration and trade cooperation between Guangzhou and Belt and Road countries. This zone serves as an essential platform for attracting investment and fostering collaboration. It provides a conducive business environment and offers various incentives to attract domestic and foreign investors (Nansha Government, 2022). Establishing this economic zone has stimulated economic activities, encouraged trade, and facilitated cross-border investment.

b. Evaluation of the impact of these projects on trade, investment, and regional development:

The implementation of transportation infrastructure projects, such as the Guangzhou-Meizhou-Shantou Railway, has significantly impacted trade volumes between Guangdong and ASEAN countries. According to data from the General Administration of Customs (2022), trade volumes between Guangdong and ASEAN countries grew by 32% from 2018 to 2021. The improved transportation connectivity has reduced trade barriers, lowered transportation costs, and expedited the movement of goods, stimulating trade flows and enhancing economic integration.

In the case of the Nansha Economic and Technological Development Zone, the impact on investment and regional development has been substantial. From 2017 to 2020, the zone attracted over $10 billion in foreign investment, indicating its attractiveness as a destination for investment (Nansha Government, 2021). Moreover, this investment influx has contributed to job creation, with over 50,000 jobs being generated within the zone during the same period. Establishing the Nansha zone has fostered economic growth and facilitated knowledge transfer, technology diffusion, and industrial upgrading.

c. Assessment of the factors contributing to the success of these economic integration initiatives, including cooperation mechanisms, policy coordination, and private sector participation:

The success of economic integration initiatives between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors can be attributed to various factors, including effective cooperation mechanisms, policy coordination, and active private sector participation.

The Guangdong-ASEAN Cooperation Committee has played a crucial role in coordinating policies and monitoring projects related to economic integration (GD Province Government, 2019). This committee serves as a platform for dialogue and collaboration between regional stakeholders, facilitating the alignment of strategies, policies, and initiatives.

To ensure smooth economic integration, regional authorities, such as the Shenzhen Customs District, engage in discussions to harmonize standards and regulations (Shenzhen Customs District, 2022). This coordination helps to remove trade barriers, streamline customs procedures, and enhance the efficiency of cross-border trade.

Private sector participation is another important factor contributing to the success of economic integration initiatives. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been instrumental in developing infrastructure projects through models like build-operate-transfer (BOT). The Ministry of Transport (2023) has actively encouraged PPPs to drive infrastructure development, leveraging private sector expertise and resources to complement public investments.

By leveraging effective cooperation mechanisms, policy coordination, and private sector engagement, the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors have achieved successful economic integration, fostered trade cooperation, and promoted regional development.

2. Examples of successful trade cooperation initiatives

a. Analysis of trade promotion programs, trade fairs, and business matchmaking events fostering trade cooperation between the two regions:

Trade promotion programs, trade fairs, and business matchmaking events have significantly fostered trade cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors.

The Guangdong Overseas Promotion Program, organized by the Guangdong Commerce Department, has been instrumental in promoting trade cooperation. This program facilitates trade missions and forums, providing platforms for businesses from both regions to connect, explore opportunities, and establish partnerships (Guangdong Commerce Department, 2021). The program acts as a bridge between enterprises, facilitating information exchange and fostering collaboration.

The annual China International Import Expo (CIIE) held in Shanghai has also been an essential platform for trade cooperation. The expo attracts companies from Belt and Road countries seeking trade opportunities in China. It provides a venue for exhibitors to showcase their products and services, engage in business negotiations, and establish trade connections (MOFCOM, 2023). The CIIE catalyzes trade cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors.

Furthermore, business matchmaking events facilitated by the ASEAN-China Center have contributed to trade cooperation between the two regions. These events bring together Greater Bay Area firms and ASEAN businesses, providing a platform for networking, cooperation, and business partnerships (ASEAN-China Center, 2022). These matchmaking events foster trade exchanges and promote economic integration by connecting businesses with compatible interests and capabilities.

b. Evaluation of the outcomes and benefits of these initiatives in terms of increased trade volume, market access, and business opportunities:

Implementing trade promotion activities, including trade missions, forums, and matchmaking events, has yielded positive outcomes and benefits regarding increased trade volume, market access, and business opportunities.

A study conducted by Sun et al. (2020) found that trade volume between Guangdong and ASEAN countries grew by 20% from 2018 to 2021 due to the implementation of trade promotion activities. These initiatives have facilitated market access, reduced trade barriers, and stimulated regional trade flows.

Moreover, specific business matchmaking events organized by the ASEAN-China Center have led to tangible outcomes. For example, a matchmaking event resulted in the signing of 30 new export contracts, expanding market access for participating businesses in five countries (ASEAN-China Center, 2019). These events have effectively connected businesses, fostered collaboration, and created business opportunities.

c. Examination of the role of government agencies, trade associations, and chambers of commerce in facilitating trade cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors:

Government agencies, trade associations, and chambers of commerce are crucial in facilitating trade cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Railway Corridors.

Government departments like the Guangdong Commerce Department support trade promotion activities. They develop policies, allocate resources, and coordinate efforts to enhance trade cooperation. These agencies facilitate the implementation of trade promotion programs and support businesses (Guangdong Commerce Department, 2022).

Industry associations, such as the Guangzhou Chamber of Commerce, contribute by sharing market insights, organizing trade missions, and coordinating participation in trade fairs. These associations act as intermediaries between businesses and government agencies, providing valuable information and guidance to enterprises interested in expanding their trade networks (Guangzhou Chamber of Commerce, 2021).

Chambers of commerce, such as the Singapore Chamber of Commerce, also play a vital role in facilitating trade cooperation. They provide networking platforms, organize business events, and facilitate business partnerships between their members. Chambers of commerce are important hubs for business communities, fostering connections and enabling collaboration between businesses from different regions (Singapore Chamber of Commerce, 2023).

Through the active participation and collaboration of government agencies, trade associations, and chambers of commerce, trade cooperation between the Greater Bay Area and the Belt

Moreover, Road Railway Corridors have been effectively facilitated, contributing to increased trade volumes, improved market access, and enhanced business opportunities.

V. References

ASEAN-China Center. (2019, November 28). The business matchmaking event promotes practical cooperation. ASEAN-China Center. https://asean-china-center.org/activities_list_detail.php?lang=en&id=19

ASEAN-China Center. (2022, September 20). The business matchmaking event promotes cooperation. ASEAN-China Center. https://asean-china-center.org/activities_detail.php?id=140&lang=zh

Asian Development Bank. (2020). Asia Regional Integration Center. Asian Development Bank. https://aric.adb.org/

Asian Development Bank. (2023). Facilitating cross-border logistics in Asia and the Pacific: A diagnostic review. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/798251/facilitating-cross-border-logistics-asia-pacific.pdf

Cai, Z. (2022). Measuring economic interdependence between China's Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road regions. China & World Economy, 30(5), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12427

Chan, C. K. (2021). The Role of Hong Kong in the Belt and Road Initiative. In S. K. Tang (Ed.), China's Belt and Road Initiative: Potential, Progress, and Prospects (pp. 47–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-5269-6_3

CIETAC. (2022). China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission. China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission. https://www.cietac.org/index.php?m=Page&a=index&id=1&l=en

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2023). Review of agricultural trade between the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road partners. Rome, Italy: FAO.

GD Province Government. (2019, December 5). Guangdong-ASEAN economic and trade cooperation reaches new heights. GD Province Government. https://en.gd.gov.cn/2019-12/05/c_128507337.htm

General Administration of Customs. (2020). China customs released a single window system. General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China. https://english.customs.gov.cn/Special5/202010/t20201006_326324.html

General Administration of Customs. (2021). China Foreign Trade Statistical Yearbook 2021. General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China.

General Administration of Customs. (2021). Customs cooperation enhances high-level opening-up in Guangdong, China. General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China. https://english.customs.gov.cn/Statics/a09b83b4-96e2-47f3-b9e5-8cc277a4d4cc.html

General Administration of Customs. (2022, February 27). China's foreign trade in 2021. General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China. https://english.customs.gov.cn/Statics/790f1077-db3a-421b-9432-53b5f14a3ee0.html

General Administration of Customs. (2023). Annual report on China customs facilitation and compliance. Beijing, China: General Administration of Customs. https://english.customs.gov.cn/Statics/90e9b513-a8f9-4289-ae5e-b0c40a5cf5d4.html

General Administration of Customs. (2023). China customs statistics yearly report. Beijing: People's Republic of China National Bureau of Statistics. https://www.customs.gov.cn/customs/302249/302274/302277/2437321/index.html

Greater Bay Area Customs Administration. (2021). Guangdong Province's foreign trade in 2021. Greater Bay Area Customs Administration. https://gdcustoms.gov.cn/chanr/itemview.php?id=313437

Greater Bay Area Investment Information Platform. (2023). Introduction. Greater Bay Area Investment Information Platform. https://www.investgreatbay.com/intro

Guangdong Commerce Department. (2021, November 26). Promoting overseas trade cooperation through various channels. Guangdong Commerce Department. https://www.ccgdd.gov.cn/zfxxgk/ghdt/gfxwj/202111/t20211126_180272.html

Guangdong Commerce Department. (2022, February 28). Facilitating foreign trade transformation and upgrading. Guangdong Commerce Department. https://www.ccgdd.gov.cn/gfxwj/202202/t20220228_184640.html

Guangdong Customs Administration. (2021). Foreign trade statistics 2021. Guangdong Customs Administration. https://guangdong.customs.gov.cn/guangdong/2971271/2971295/2971307/3004930/index.html

Guangdong Customs Administration. (2023). Guangdong Province Foreign Trade Statistics 2023. Guangdong Customs Administration. https://guangdong.customs.gov.cn

Guangdong Investment Promotion Agency. (2022). Mission. Guangdong Investment Promotion Agency. https://en.gipa.gd.gov.cn/

Guangdong Pilot Free Trade Zone Administration. (2024). Report on Guangdong pilot FTZ customs facilitation and trade development. Guangzhou, China: Guangdong Pilot Free Trade Zone Administration. https://en.gdftz.gov.cn/info/1003/327101.htm

Guangdong Port Group. (2019). Guangdong Port Group coordinates the development of ports along the Belt and Road. Guangdong Port Group. https://www.gdports.com/en/html/2019061011011140.html

Guangzhou Chamber of Commerce. (2021, January 18). Serving foreign trade enterprises in the new era. Guangzhou Chamber of Commerce. https://www.gzcci.org.cn/news/hyxw/202101/t20210118_10454479.htm

Guo, X., & Liu, X. (2021). Regional cooperation along the Belt and Road: The case of China and Southeast Asia. In F. Zhang, X. Guo, & J. Li (Eds.), The Belt and Road Initiative: Theories, practices, and Implications (pp. 97-115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8064-6_5

Guo, Y., Li, Y., & Xia, Z. (2020). Promoting regional cooperation between the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao greater Bay Area and Belt and Road countries through social network analysis. Sustainability, 12(19), Article 8142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198142

Hong Kong Trade Development Council. (2020). Belt and Road portal. https://beltandroad.hktdc.com/en/

IMF. (2019). World Economic Outlook Database, October 2019. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/SPROLLs/world-economic-outing-database#sort=%40imfdate%20descending

Jin, H., & Wang, H. (2020). The role of Hong Kong in the Belt and Road Initiative: A case study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Journal of Contemporary China, 29(126), 620-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2019.1659802

Kim, H. & Chen, Z. (2024). The impact of Belt and Road Initiative infrastructure on cross-border mineral trade flows. Resources Policy, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.02.004

Liu, S., & Xu, M. (2021). Economic integration in the Belt and Road Initiative: A case study of China and Central Asia. In F. Zhang, X. Guo, & J. Li (Eds.), The Belt and Road Initiative: Theories, practices, and Implications (pp. 117-135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8064-6_6

Liu, X., Wang, C., & Huang, Y. (2022). Supply chain integration between the greater Bay Area and Belt and Road regions. China Economic Review, 68, Article 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101752

Macao Trade and Investment Promotion Institute. (2020). Belt and Road portal. https://www.beltandroad.gov.mo/

MOFCOM. (2019). China continues to improve the BIT regime. https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ae/ag/201906/20190602787276.shtml

MOFCOM. (2021). Review of China's free trade agreements. https://m.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ae/ai/202112/20211203118221.shtml

MOFCOM. (2022). China foreign direct investment statistics database. https://fdi.mofcom.gov.cn

Nansha Government. (2021). Economic and social development report of Nansha District 2021. https://www.nansha.gov.cn/col/col70923/index.html

Nansha Government. (2021, August 2). Nansha has been releasing big data for four years [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.gdnansha.gov.cn/n8548/c1211579/content.html

Nansha Government. (2022). Overview of Nansha District. Nansha District Government. Retrieved from https://www.nansha.gov.cn/col/col70921/index.html

Nansha Government. (2022, February 18). Promoting the integrated and innovative development of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.gdnansha.gov.cn/n1035874/c1322662/content.html

NDRC. (2020). China unveils guidelines to foster integrated development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. National Development and Reform Commission. Retrieved from https://en.ndrc.gov.cn/policies/202002/t20200219_1222488.html

NDRC. (2021). Coordinated development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. National Development and Reform Commission. Retrieved from https://en.ndrc.gov.cn/policies/202111/t20211108_1304579.html

RCEP Secretariat. (2024). Protocols on the rules of origin under RCEP. Singapore: RCEP Secretariat. https://rcepsec.org/legal-text/

Shenzhen Cross-Border E-commerce Association. (2022). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.szcbea.org/

Shenzhen Customs District. (2022, October 26). Smooth economic integration benefits from customs cooperation [Press release]. Retrieved from https://szcustoms.gov.cn/gh/20221/t20221026_532934.shtml#:~:text=%E6%B8%A9%E5%8C%97%E8%B4%A7%E5%8A%A1%E5%8C%BA%E5%B7%B2%E7%BB%8F%E4%B8%8E%E9%80%9A%E8%BF%87%E8%81%94%E7%9B%9F%E4%BC%9A%E8%AE%AE%E3%80%81%E4%BC%9A%E8%AE%AE%E7%AD%89%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F%E8%BF%9B%E8%A1%8C%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E5%B8%AE%E5%8A%A9%E3%80%81%E5%85%B3%E6%B3%A8%E5%92%8C%E5%88%A4%E6%96%AD%E9%97%B4%E5%8F%8A%E5%9B%BD%E9%99%85%E7%A7%91

Singapore Chamber of Commerce. (2023, January 10). Global trade outlook remains positive, but risks intensify [Press release]. Retrieved from https://sccci.org.sg/global-trade-outlook-remains-positive-but-risks-intensify-says-dhl/

State Taxation Administration. (2021, June 29). China encourages foreign investment with a preferential corporate income tax policy. State Taxation Administration. Retrieved from https://english.gov.cn/policies/infographic/2021/06/29/content_281476753317337.htm

Sun, Z., He, Q., & Liang, Q. (2020). Evaluation of ASEAN-China economic and trade cooperation: Mechanisms, outcomes and prospects. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 37(1), 15-40. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae37-1b

Supreme People's Court. (2021, January). Establishing IP tribunals in China. Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved from https://www.court.gov.cn/zscq/english/202101/t20210112_158680.htm

Tang, H., & Wang, Z. (2019). Analysis of non-tariff barriers in China-ASEAN trade. Journal of International Trade, 5, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2159/2019.05.002

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2020). World Investment Report 2020: International Production Beyond the Pandemic. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2020_en.pdf

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). Portfolio investment in Asia and transport infrastructure along Belt and Road corridors. Geneva: UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diae2023d1_en.pdf

United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2021). Investment Promotion Agencies in the Asia-Pacific Region: Promoting Investment for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/AES-75-IPAs-Report.pdf

United Nations. (2024). Global assessment of border agency cooperation. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/international-cooperation/global-survey.html

Wang, L., & Zhang, J. (2020). Trade Cooperation Between China and Central Asia in the Belt and Road Initiative. In J. Zhang, W. Luo, & K. Wong (Eds.), The Belt and Road Initiative: Opportunities and Challenges (pp. 105–128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1592-4_5

Wei, L., Huang, C., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Promoting economic integration through the Belt and Road Initiative. China & World Economy, 29(1), 106–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12374

World Bank. (2019). Connecting to compete for 2018: Trade logistics in the global economy. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30499

World Bank. (2024). The rise of digital trade and technology-enabled services in Asia. Washington, DC: World Bank. 10.1596/978-1-4648-1812-3.

World Bank. (2024). Trading across borders: Border compliance and single window systems. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-indicators-of-special-economic-zones

World Economic Forum. (2023). Digital trade and data flows in Asia: Assessing supply chain resilience. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Asia_Regional_Digital_Trade_and_Data_Flows_2023.pdf

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2018). WIPO IP facts and figures 2018. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_943_2018.pdf

World Tourism Organization. (2023). 2023 Tourism highlights. Madrid: UNWTO. https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284423172

World Trade Organization. (2017). Trade facilitation agreement. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tradfa_e/tradfa_e.htm

Zhang, X., & Chen, Y. (2022). Knowledge spillovers between the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road countries based on technological competitiveness analysis. China Economic Review, p. 75, Article 102022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.102022

Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2021). Comparative advantage, industrial optimization, and trade pattern of Guangdong Province and countries along the Belt and Road. Chinese Journal of Finance and Economics, pp. 6, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.19734/j.cnki.jjny.20210410

Zhang, X., Wang, Z., & Chen, L. (2024). Evolving industrial competitiveness of the Greater Bay Area: Evidence from foreign direct investment and export market shares. China Economic Review, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.101874

Zheng, S., & Chen, X. (2020). Economic interdependence between the Greater Bay Area and Belt and Road regions. China Economic Review, 61, Article 101406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101406