Forget Free College. Here's How to Fix the Student Debt Crisis.
Jeff Selingo
Bestselling author | Strategic advisor on future of learning and work | College admissions and early career expert | Contributor, The Atlantic | Angel investor | Editor, Next newsletter | Co-host, FutureU podcast
In this series, students and industry experts share stories and perspectives from inside the student debt crisis. Share yours here using #StudentDebt.
Twenty-one years ago this month, I graduated from Ithaca College. As the son of a schoolteacher and a teacher’s aide, I financed an education at the private college in upstate New York through a combination of work, scholarships, and student loans.
Like today’s students, when I was called to the bursar’s office each semester to sign my federal loan checks, I never considered what impact they might have on my life after college. Six months after graduation, my payment booklet arrived from Sallie Mae. My first payment was around $50.
Unlike current graduates, my debt was manageable on a journalist’s salary of $420 a week. This month, among those who financed college through loans, the average graduate left commencement day $33,000 in debt. Six months from now, those graduates will receive their first payment notice in the mail, on average for about $380, with 120 more monthly payments ahead of them.
When student debt accounts for 15% of a new graduate’s take-home salary it can have an impact on the career decisions someone makes when just starting out
That figure might not seem like much, but when it accounts for about 15 percent of an average new graduate’s take-home salary it can have an impact on the career decisions someone makes when just starting out. Salary—not fit, happiness, or career advancement—becomes the driving decision in choosing a job. Debt rules out unpaid internships that could lead to a top-notch job, for example, or living in pricey cities with dynamic labor markets that offer twenty-somethings many job options.
I met many of those recent graduates while reporting my new book, There Is Life After College. Student debt dictated their lives after college like they never imagined when they decided where to go to school four years earlier. Now they were stuck in dead-end jobs solely because they needed a steady paycheck to pay off their loans.
Many of them also gave up on their dreams of becoming an entrepreneur. Gallup has found that among those who graduated from college since 2006 with some debt, 1 in 5 young adults said they delayed starting a business because of their loans. For graduates who left college with more than $25,000 in loan debt, 1 in 4 said they decided to forgo their plans for a start-up.
This is why students and parents should consider how much debt they are willing to take on before they make their college choice. In doing so, remember that half of all colleges give freshmen bigger grants than they do sophomores, juniors, and seniors. In other words, the student loan you take on your first year is likely to be the smallest of your undergraduate career, especially because federal limits on loan amounts increase as you go through college (they are $5,500 for freshmen and $7,500 by the time you reach your junior year).
Debt is inevitable for most students. The federal government suggests that no more than 15 percent of your income should go toward paying off student-loan debt. Another rule of thumb: Your total undergraduate borrowing should be limited to what you might expect to make your first year after graduation.
The rising cost of a college education has, as usual, turned into the subject of intense discussions on the campaign trail for president this year. Sen. Bernie Sanders has fueled that debate with his proposal for free college, a proposal that will ultimately do little to change the cost of college in my opinion.
If the next president really wants to fix the impact that college debt has on young adults, here are three fixes to get them started:.
Limit a student’s ability to borrow
Colleges should be able to limit how much students may borrow, perhaps based on major or tuition price. Without such caps, some students “cash out” at low-cost institutions and borrow well above the price of tuition.
Extend the timeframe for repayment
Even as the average loan amount has increased, the standard repayment term has remained at 10 years. The U.S. has one of the shortest repayment time periods in the world. Students in Sweden, for example, pay their loans back over 25 years.
Make loan limits consistent by year in school
How much students are allowed to borrow from the federal government differs by their year in school. The original goal of the varying limits was to have students access grants instead of loans as they were getting started in school before shifting the burden to upperclassmen as an incentive to finish their degree. The problem is that the loan limits haven’t kept pace with the rise in college prices, forcing students to turn to more expensive private loans to fill in the gap or their parents to take on loans of their own.
Whether student loans have reached crisis proportions is still a matter of debate. It's important to remember that those eye-popping six-figure debt stories you read about are mostly young adults who also borrowed for graduate or professionals school. And 30 percent of students don't borrow anything for college. But that good statistics about student debt can quickly turn to bad new unless we change the worrisome trends about college costs and how students finance their education.
Jeffrey Selingo is author of the new book, There Is Life After College. You can follow his writing here, on Twitter @jselingo, on Facebook, and sign up for free newsletters about the future of higher education at jeffselingo.com.
He is a regular contributor to the Washington Post’s Grade Point blog, a professor of practice at Arizona State University, and a visiting scholar at Georgia Tech's Center for 21st Century Universities.
Owner, First Colony Aquatic and Rehab
8 年I'm unsure as to what loans the author is referring to. However the Federal Loans my co-workers and I received (1992-2013) gave us payment duration options. The shortest was 10 years and the longest was 25. I picked the 25 and paid extra. One of my co-workers picked 10 and pays extra. Another had 2X her salary in loan debt, so pays the minimum, about $1400/month. All student, auto, and home loans (not rental property) should be paid off as soon as possible.
President, Welker Custom Homes, Inc.
8 年Has the concept of working in high school and college disappeared, What about a litmus test to determine the amount of loans one can take out based on their expected income in the chosen profession. Levels of Student debt are of serious concern as it comes to household formation and purchasing of homes. It really restricts the purchasing power of those with high loan levels. Instead of crying about what the effects of the loans are after graduation, lets teach students that there are other alternatives. Military service, ROTC, things like that. while they may not be the ideal path to an education, students should explore them instead of complaining about how their loans have held them back. These programs were good enough for our parents to get an education. Life is about choices. Choose a path and the hard work involved to get a free education, chose to work your way through college or choose to have large student loans to pay back later. Seems to me that they are taking the easy way out and having buyers remorse later.
Ghostwriter for Business Leaders in cybersecurity and the nonprofit sector | Nonprofit Founder & CEO
8 年This seems to ignore another facet of the problem, the unwillingness of employers to help employees pay of student debt even as they demand degrees from increasingly expensive institutions. For example, I was told I received my first post-college job at a newspaper in my home state specifically because of the out-of-state school I went to because the state school applicants were unqualified. To attend this school, I maintained a 3.5 in two majors in order to keep two merit scholarships, worked the maximum number of federal work-study hours available to me, stayed on campus and worked for holidays, received some minor assistance from my grandparents (my parents couldn't even qualify for a TREE loan; that's how little they earned) and still graduated with about $40,000 in debt. For that, I made $12.25/hour as a journalist and took home about $1,300 after taxes and health insurance (I could only afford the lowest tier of coverage). My first loan payment was $245, quite a bit when I was staring at $700/month in just rent, and that was considered cheap. I knew my state's school was not known as a good school for journalism and mostly don't regret my decision to earn a degree with more cache in the jobs marketplace. But so many discussions about student debt don't even discuss the importance of a degree's value that causes many students to choose to incur more debt. The second issue is many industry employers demand degrees that should lead to careers but pay employees in that field little more than they would make at a summer job and usually less than those with technical skills earn. If you want a reporter to have a Mass Comm degree, than perhaps the company should either make it a salary position or include some kind of student-debt repayment plan. The same is true for teachers and even lawyers. They demand a $120,000 degree but don't put their employees in a position to pay for that degree. They either need to lower their standards or there needs to be apush for employer tuition reimbursement programs.
Wonder
8 年I agree that the financial obligations are too much. But Ron, with all due respect, I agree with much of these posts; however, the students should get educated if they are not educated enough. Take advantage of the almost unlimited resources at Universities. Its the attitude and, simply put, lack of respect concerning education that bothers me; this comes from the "adults" and trickles down to the students. Growing ones intellect, in general, makes for a more productive person and a better society; there are plenty of educational resources for people to achieve this. "Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that Democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge' " Isaac Asimov Love that quote
Wonder
8 年Its up to the student and the parents to make sure the student gets what they need from their education. There are almost unlimited resources at Universities for students to educate themselves; all that's needed is to have the drive and willingness to take advantage of the resources as well as the respect for the education process. However, when people criticize or demean education, ex. college, that trickles down to the student and how seriously they approach their time at University. Again, I agree with much of what is being said in these posts; my point was simply about an underlying attitude in the country that has been growing concerning an anti-intellectualist idea that growing your intellect is not that important. "Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that Democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge' " Isaac Asimov