Forecasting & Model Trains: Lessons From the Rails
Hey there!
Tired of hearing about “training models?” Okay, let’s take a break and talk about model trains instead.?
When I was a kid, I was obsessed with them. Not just running them - I loved figuring out which models worked best for different tracks and setups. The sleek passenger engines weren't always better than the sturdy freight locomotives. It all depended on what you were trying to do.
I think about those trains whenever we help revenue teams choose forecasting models. According to Gartner, less than 50% of sales leaders trust their forecasts - often because they're trying to run their revenue on the wrong track with the wrong engine.
Just like with trains, the "best" forecasting model depends entirely on what you're carrying and where you're headed. A high-growth startup needs different things than a mature enterprise. A sales-led organization needs different mechanisms than a product-led one. So let's line up our models side by side and see what each one does best.
The Four Key Revenue Forecasting Models:
Switching Tracks: The Power of Hybrid Approaches
The most successful companies aren't choosing just one model - they're combining approaches. For example, use bottom-up models (like sales capacity) for near-term forecasting where you need precision, and top-down models for longer-term projections where trends matter more.
Three Questions to Ask When Choosing Your Model:
As always, we’ve put together an extensive article for anyone who’s as obsessed with the details as we are. Read it here: Picking a Revenue Forecast Model
Best,
Batu