Forcing Change (Part 1)

Forcing Change (Part 1)

22 years ago, in the year 2000, the then Institute of Medicine (now the Academy of Medicine) published "To Err is Human." In the very first chapter, the authors state:"Marketplace incentives direct the values, culture, and priorities of health care organizations and reward performance beyond the minimum. One way this can happen is by purchasers and consumers requesting and using information to direct their business to the best organizations and providers in a community." Put plainly, they were asking for transparency. Transparency in outcomes of care, and transparency in the price of care.

For 20 of the past 22 years, employers, non-profit groups, healthcare-focused Foundations, some state agencies and legislatures, as well as economists and policy makers have all been fighting for greater transparency. Some states instituted all-payer claims databases (and were sued). Employers demanded full access to their claims data (and were denied). Consumers asked for pricing information from providers (and were given useless charges or no information). Along with Catalyst for Payment Reform, my former non-profit, the Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute, published yearly reports on transparency to rate states on how well (or poorly) they were doing. The last version, published in late 2017, showed that few states were successful at making price information transparent.

The efforts of the incumbents to combat transparency has been unrelenting, and all of the valiant efforts of all the groups asking for the information that is required to make good decisions couldn't make enough of a dent. As a result, change was imposed on the industry through federal legislation -- and the industry sued to block it.

The transcripts of the court arguments by representatives of the American Hospital Association are laughable, but had it not been for the valiant efforts over two decades mentioned above, the judges may have been swayed by the industry. They weren't, and we've now entered into a new era thanks to forced change.

No alt text provided for this image


This new era was ushered in by the Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) of 2021, about which my colleagues Jeffrey Hogan and Chris Deacon have spoken and written a lot. The CAA had two titles that directly impact the industry -- Title 1 The No Surprise Act (NSA) and Title 2 Transparency. While the NSA is important because it stops the heretofore egregious acts by some providers of billing charges to patients because they are providing services out-of-network at an in-network facility (for example ED physicians billing charges after delivering care to patients in an ED that is in network), it's nothing compared to the current and future effects of the Transparency portion of the law.

Here are a just a few of the market-changing requirements built into the law:

  1. No more gag clauses or other market-rigging stipulations in provider-payer contracts;
  2. No more hidden provider fee schedules or price information blocking;
  3. No more shopping in the dark for consumers;
  4. No more guessing about a patient's expected cost-sharing for care they need;
  5. No more guessing by providers about which facility is more expensive than another when they refer patients;
  6. No more hiding direct and indirect fees or commissions by brokers or benefits consultants when the recommend an insurance plan to an employer.

You really need to pause and look at this list and reflect deeply on the way in which the business of healthcare has been run to-date. Simply remove the "No more" from each bullet. That's the difference between the old and the new eras of U.S. health care. It's truly a different day and here's one simple example of the effect this will have.

Until July 1 of this year, if an employer, a group of entrepreneurs, or anyone else in the industry wanted to identify high performing providers in a market, they were either limited to mining Medicare data (which doesn't always work for under 65 insured populations) or their own data, which was imperfect. If they wanted to compare the performance of the providers that were caring for their employees with the rest of the providers in a geography, they could leverage available commercial claims datasets such as Merative 's Marketscan. However, those datasets always masked provider identity because of #1 and #2 above. The system was designed to keep this information locked up so that no one could truly compete, because the incumbents all know that competition for value will erode the fat margins they have carefully built and protected over the years at our collective expense.

All those barriers, all that market opacity, all that information blocking were wiped away with one law. It took a little over 20 years, and it also took a law. The change was forced onto the industry because the industry refused to change by itself. And why would it when it so heftily benefited from it? After all, it's the incentives, stupid.

More change is needed, and in particular to get the industry to move much more aggressively from fee-for-service to advanced alternative payment models. That change also might very well have to be forced onto the system.


Next: Forcing Change (Part 2)

Mark Galvin

President and CEO, TALON

2 年

Well written worthy of 4 minutes to read (6 for me, I'm slow)! Now we need to get rid of the 80/20 rule of the ACA (MLR rules at state level too) so all incentives are aligned!

回复
Steve Schutzer, MD

Co-Founder, Upswing Health

2 年

Beautifully written from someone who has invested so many years to this cause. Thank you. I agree, Francois, the letters of this law will initiate a seismic ripple and domino effect, lifting the cloak of secrecy from healthcare prices - and consumers will say "have we been fleeced?" Looking forward to your next installment!

回复
Caitlin M.

Value-Based Care | Digital Health | Innovation | Collaboration | Strategic Partnership | Person-Centric

2 年

Reading the excerpt about “to err is human” is striking. Cannot believe it has been over 20 years and we are still having many of the same conversations. Thank you for highlighting the recent wins the CAA brings. How long do you think it will be before we see real effects of the CAA especially in advancing APMs?

回复
Larry Becker

Enjoying the good life

2 年

Francois de Brantes thanks to you and so many others for staying the course. Our efforts over the past two decades are about to pay off…if…we stay vigilant and watchful. The law is one thing, changing is another…all calculated against the risk of a potential penalty for not adhering to the law.

回复
Robert Kritzler

Senior Physician visionary and consultant in Population Health

2 年

A great series very well said the real change in incentives is decades overdue and I fear will take exactly what you appear to suggest-a “force” and regrettably it will take a very long time the elimination of low value care , as waste, has been front and center for a long time and we have only scratched the surface.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Francois de Brantes的更多文章

  • As the Saying Goes.....

    As the Saying Goes.....

    Several posts have popped up about the new study from Milbank Memorial Fund on the sorry state of Primary Care in the…

    19 条评论
  • It’s not that they can’t. It’s that they won’t. Because we can. And if we can, they can.

    It’s not that they can’t. It’s that they won’t. Because we can. And if we can, they can.

    It does take a few critical ingredients: trust, transparency and common sense. And these are pretty rare in the current…

    7 条评论
  • In the clearing stands a boxer

    In the clearing stands a boxer

    "And a fighter by his trade, and he carries the reminders of every glove that laid him down or cut him till he cried…

    15 条评论
  • There's a reason CMS is launching TEAM

    There's a reason CMS is launching TEAM

    The soon to be fully published final rule on the 2025 inpatient prospective payment system includes several sections…

    5 条评论
  • It's not a caricature, it's real.

    It's not a caricature, it's real.

    For several years, West Health has been publishing a report in collaboration with Gallup to assess the affordability…

    6 条评论
  • Average Plan Discounts Don't Matter. Period. Full Stop.

    Average Plan Discounts Don't Matter. Period. Full Stop.

    As the saying goes, by focusing on a single element of a problem, you're likely to miss the real solutions. And so it…

    12 条评论
  • Payment innovation isn’t dead at all, quite the contrary.

    Payment innovation isn’t dead at all, quite the contrary.

    While CMS’ “innovation center” continues to not innovate, the private sector is picking up the slack and the market is…

    7 条评论
  • It's an insider's joke, and employers have been the butt of it.

    It's an insider's joke, and employers have been the butt of it.

    Anyone who has seen Casablanca knows these lines by heart. Anyone who has toiled in our healthcare industry for a while…

    9 条评论
  • Burned Out

    Burned Out

    Many of us have felt that the light had gone dim inside CMS' Innovation Center. Their most recent RFI for an…

    10 条评论
  • Salve Expensum Reformatus

    Salve Expensum Reformatus

    In a recently published viewpoint in JAMA Network, Dr. Don Berwick references an ancient fresco in Pompeii on which the…

    11 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了