Force Majeure and the Doctrine of Frustration

Unarguably, the growing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic is leaving a number questions marks relating to current contractual obligations that cannot be fulfilled during this period of uncertainty. Whether parties have entered into commercial contracts or tenancies/leases may very well experience the dramatic effect of Covid-19 and the potential legal implications associated to their obligations under the agreement in question.

Parties to a contract may wish to consider invoking a force majeure clause (provided the governing contract specifies an express clause) or the common law doctrine of frustration in order to gain relief. 

What is Force Majeure?

Otherwise known as “superior force” this clause is intended to either suspend or terminate contractual obligations if an unforeseeable event occurs that is outside the parties’ control which ultimately prevents one of the parties from performing its obligations. It is important to note that force majeure is not statute based and therefore the express wording of the clause in the governing contract is of paramount importance. 

Types of Force Majeure

Typically, the types of specified events that fall under force majeure are as follows:

  • Adverse/extreme weather conditions
  • War
  •  Riot
  • Act(s) of God
  • Industrial action
  • Government action.

The Effect 

If one or more of the specified events occurs then the contractual performance will be suspended for a specific period of time. 

If the event is still occurring at the end of the contract date then it can be considered terminated. However, this is clearly going to be problematic given that there is no timescale which can reasonably be provided for this pandemic to come to an end. 

Conclusion

Whether one can rely on and gain relief exercising force majeure is very much dependent on the wording of the clause specified in the governing contract. In any event, a negotiated commercial outcome held between the parties could potentially be the most reasonable and cost effective method going way forward as Covid-19 has been deemed, by some as indefinite for now. 

Doctrine of frustration

In the event that there is no force majeure clause in the governing contract or the clause does not cover the event of a pandemic, parties may wish to rely on the doctrine of frustration. 

This allows a contract to be discharged when an unforeseen event occurs that renders the performance of the contract impossible, particularly when it not the fault of either party. 

What is a frustrating event?

A frustrated event can be defined as follows:

1.     Unexpected

2.     Beyond the parties control; and

3.     Makes performance of the contract impossible, illegal or radically different from that which parties initially contemplated at the time of entering into the contract.

If frustration is satisfied, then the contract can be brought to an end automatically and all parties will be released from their obligations.

It is certainly worth noting that Tthe threshold of successfully bringing either claim is considerably high.  Therefore, it is strongly advised to seek legal advice in order to consider whether there is scope for either claim to be made as there can be severe consequence for the complaining party should any wrongful claims be made. 



要查看或添加评论,请登录

Inderjit Farmahan的更多文章

  • 'Breathing space' on commercial contracts

    'Breathing space' on commercial contracts

    The lockdown restrictions has fast become an international effort to combat the spread of Covid-19 but these…

  • 6th Bulletin of the Queen's Bench Division

    6th Bulletin of the Queen's Bench Division

    Introduced on 20 April 2020, this bulletin focuses on CPR 55 in relation to trespass claims. The 117th CPR amendment…

  • New guidance for Individual Voluntary Arrangements

    New guidance for Individual Voluntary Arrangements

    On 17 April 2020, the Insolvency Service published an interim guidance for IVAs which should be read in conjunction…

  • Amendment to default judgment

    Amendment to default judgment

    On 6 April 2020, the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2020 came into force which introduced a few amendments to the…

  • The Carluccio High Court Judgment pursuant to the CJRS

    The Carluccio High Court Judgment pursuant to the CJRS

    On 13 April 2020, the very first Judgment relating to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (“CJRS”) was handed down by…

  • Online Civil Money Claims Pilot

    Online Civil Money Claims Pilot

    On 14 April 2020, CPR 51R came into force which makes amendments to the Online Civil Money Claims (OCMC) Pilot. Albeit…

  • Update on Qualifying Furloughed Employees

    Update on Qualifying Furloughed Employees

    On 15 April 2020, the Chancellor issued a further Treasury Direction pursuant to s.71 and 76 of Coronavirus Act 2020.

  • Impact on Residential Tenancies

    Impact on Residential Tenancies

    On 25 March 2020, the Coronavirus Act 2020 came into force in order to bring a number of emergency measures to deal…

  • Temporary Insolvency Practice Direction (TIPD)

    Temporary Insolvency Practice Direction (TIPD)

    Enforced on 6 April 2020, the TIPD has been introduced in order to provide “workable solutions for court users during…

  • 118th amendment to the CPR

    118th amendment to the CPR

    118th amendment brings a temporary measure to deal with proceedings caught up in the Covid-19 pandemic so that the…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了