Food Safety Management System (FSMS) vs. Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

?? (Written by Anil M V, 24 years experience, {Bsc. Agric, MBA, CTP} Founder, * Organil Services)

Food safety is a critical concern for food producers, processors, and consumers worldwide. Ensuring food safety involves different frameworks and regulations, two of which are the Food Safety Management System (FSMS) and the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). Although they share common goals, their scope, implementation, and regulatory basis differ significantly. Here, we'll explore the key differences between FSMS and FSMA.

1. Definition and Scope

FSMS (Food Safety Management System):

- Definition: FSMS refers to a systematic approach to controlling food safety hazards within a food business. It encompasses a set of policies, procedures, and practices designed to ensure food safety throughout the supply chain.

- Scope: FSMS is broad and can include various standards like ISO 22000, HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points), and other local and international food safety standards. It is applicable to any organization involved in the food supply chain, from farm to fork.

FSMA (Food Safety Modernization Act):

- Definition: FSMA is a U.S. federal law enacted in 2011 that aims to shift the focus of food safety from reactive to preventive measures. It grants the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) new powers to regulate the way foods are grown, harvested, and processed.

- Scope: FSMA applies primarily to food facilities within the United States and those exporting food to the U.S. It includes specific regulations for different sectors of the food industry, including produce safety, preventive controls for human and animal food, foreign supplier verification, and intentional adulteration.

2. Regulatory Basis and Enforcement

FSMS:

- Regulatory Basis: FSMS is based on voluntary standards and guidelines. Organizations choose to implement these systems to meet customer requirements, improve food safety, and achieve certification.

- Enforcement: Enforcement is typically through third-party audits and certifications. Organizations may be certified to standards like ISO 22000 by accredited certification bodies.

FSMA:

- Regulatory Basis: FSMA is a mandatory federal law in the United States. It is enforced by the FDA, which has the authority to inspect food facilities, issue recalls, and take legal action against non-compliant entities.

- Enforcement: The FDA conducts inspections and has the authority to enforce compliance through warnings, fines, and other legal actions. Facilities must register with the FDA and are subject to regular inspections.

3. Focus and Approach

FSMS:

- Focus: FSMS focuses on identifying and controlling food safety hazards through a preventive approach. It emphasizes continuous improvement, employee training, and the use of management systems to ensure food safety.

- Approach: FSMS uses a risk-based approach, often incorporating HACCP principles to identify critical control points and establish control measures. It involves regular monitoring, verification, and validation of food safety procedures.

FSMA:

- Focus: FSMA emphasizes preventing contamination at all stages of the food supply chain. It includes specific rules for preventive controls, produce safety, and foreign supplier verification.

- Approach: FSMA mandates specific preventive measures, such as risk-based preventive controls, supply chain programs, and allergen control programs. It requires facilities to develop and implement written food safety plans and maintain detailed records.

4. Global vs. National Perspective

FSMS:

- Global Perspective: FSMS standards like ISO 22000 are recognized internationally and can be applied by food businesses worldwide. They facilitate global trade by providing a common framework for food safety.

- National Perspective: FSMS can also be tailored to meet national and regional food safety regulations, making them versatile and adaptable.

FSMA:

- Global Perspective: FSMA primarily affects U.S. food facilities and foreign suppliers exporting to the U.S. While its principles may influence international food safety practices, its regulatory requirements are specific to the U.S. market.

- National Perspective: FSMA represents a comprehensive overhaul of U.S. food safety regulations, impacting all domestic and imported food products.

5. Documentation and Record-Keeping

FSMS:

- Documentation: FSMS requires extensive documentation, including food safety policies, hazard analysis, critical control points, monitoring records, and verification activities.

- Record-Keeping: Continuous and detailed record-keeping is essential for maintaining certification and demonstrating compliance with food safety standards.

FSMA:

- Documentation: FSMA mandates written food safety plans, including hazard analysis, preventive controls, monitoring procedures, corrective actions, and verification activities.

- Record-Keeping: Facilities must maintain detailed records for a specified period (usually two years) and make them available for FDA inspection upon request.

Key Differences?

1. Nature of the Framework:

?? - FSMS: Typically voluntary and based on international standards (e.g., ISO 22000).

?? - FSMA: Mandatory and legally enforced within the U.S. by the FDA.

?2. Geographical Application:

?? - FSMS: Global application, adaptable to various international standards.

?? - FSMA: Primarily focused on the U.S. but affects international suppliers exporting to the U.S.?

3. Regulatory vs. Voluntary:

?? - FSMS: Often voluntary with third-party certification.

?? - FSMA: Regulatory compliance required by law.?

4. Scope of Implementation:

?? - FSMS: Applies broadly across the entire food supply chain.

?? - FSMA: Specific focus on preventive controls, produce safety, and foreign supplier verification within the U.S. context.

While both FSMS and FSMA aim to ensure food safety, they differ significantly in their scope, regulatory basis, focus, and implementation. FSMS provides a flexible, voluntary framework for food safety management applicable globally, whereas FSMA represents a stringent, mandatory regulatory regime specific to the United States. Understanding these differences is crucial for food businesses operating in the global market, ensuring they can comply with the relevant requirements and maintain the highest standards of food safety.

About the Author

Anil Mathew Varghese the Founder of Organil Services registered in india niche focussed unto Organic Certification Regulatory Consultancy / Advisory as per respective Country Food Organic Standards. Organil Services evolves the following roles such as : Organic Standard Organic Procedure policy content Creation,Organic Certification Assessment Plan (OCAP) with Seven Stage Organil Services CODEX Compliance, Audit trail GAP Assessment mock, Mass balance & Traceability validation, External Organic Food Audit, Pre Certification assessment, Second party processing or pre export inspection, Organic Staff orientation to the Standards, Training, Platforming Organic Standard Accreditations, Organic Documentation support and all customised with Solutions.

Mobi # +91 8606551335 Email : [email protected]

Admin Email : [email protected] Website : www.organil.org