FOI is essential at the local level

FOI is essential at the local level

We saw this morning that Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council "has criticised Freedom of Information requests as burdensome ", stating that many requests are from "people looking for business, journalistic requests and other government departments".

At mySociety, we will always push back on attempts to erode access to information. FOI is an essential mechanism by which citizens can hold public authorities to account.

And you know what: business, journalistic and governmental requests? These sound like great uses of our rights to access information.

Councils are a critical part of our right to information

First of all, FOI at this level is key to enabling the public to be active citizens. It gives oversight to the parts of local life that people really care about, like planning, bins, tax, schools, parks and social care; it's often a way in to individuals feeling that they can understand, question and feed into their local democracy.

Want a prime example? Residents of Saltburn by the Sea requested information from this very council, Redcar and Cleveland, around plans for their promenade, alongside a successful campaign to have a say in unwanted alterations:

You can see these requests here:

And elsewhere, here's how residents in Haringey used FOI as part of a campaign to preserve council housing for local people . It's the same principle: councils are working for their residents, and as such, residents rightly have the power to scrutinise them.

Why journalists' requests?

Journalistic requests certainly should not be denigrated: in fact they are often crucial cogs in the accountability of local authorities. Here are some great examples of newspapers keeping the public informed over council spending.

We only have to flick back through mySociety's own blog to see that FOI was key to uncovering how councils were using public money for unfavourable loans : and meanwhile on LGC Plus we discover that without FOI we'd never know that Thurrock Council was keeping confidential how it "invested huge sums borrowed from 100s of other local authorities".

Why business FOI requests?

It's commonly argued that businesses 'abuse' FOI by habitually scanning for open contracts, etc: but we're not against that if the information isn't available elsewhere. It's a prime example of where better publication practices might free up time for local councils.

And anyway, business requests can be beneficial for society more widely - here's a fantastic example of just that , helping start-ups occupy empty premises.

Why governmental requests?

Government requests are often a sign that joined-up data is lacking, and could be rectified by better data sharing arrangements and proactive publication of commonly requested datasets.

And why does it matter who's requesting?

All this aside, it's written into the FOI Act that it is applicant-blind – all requests should be treated as equal.

The council should not be treating "people looking for business, journalistic requests and other government departments" any differently from other requests.

Hoping for better

We could go on, but we hope that's provided a good overview of why we'll push back on a council asking that "the government significantly revise the scope of the act to reduce the burden on councils."

In fact we hope to see central government honour their commitment to extend the scope of the FOI Act, so it applies to private companies holding contracts to provide public services, thus ensuring outsourced contracts are transparent and accountable for delivery.


mySociety runs WhatDoTheyKnow , the website that makes it simple to send FOI requests.

Image: Newcomen Terrace and Redcar seafront by?Malc McDonald , CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

clive power

director of communications / head of communications / communications consultant. public-sector: council, local authority, nhs, health, government, regulator

2 个月

Whilst agreeing with most of your article, your comment about the many FOIs from businesses requesting information from councils about contracts being a “prime example of where better publication practices” would lessen these enquiries does not take note of the obligations and good practice already on councils to publish such. Examples are https://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgnl/business/tenders_and_contract/Tenders_and_contracts.aspx and https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/supporting-businesses/tenders-and-procurement. Clicks through to these datasets would provide the information quicker than FOIing but I suspect businesses will continue to use a tied and tested method, even when it is more burdensome for both them and the council. I agree that it is to councils’ benefit to ensure as many potential contractors as possible are aware of tenders. So let’s make all public data open and easy to find - without the need to FOI. Please recognise councils, etc. have already gone a long way towards that, like the London Datastore - https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset

要查看或添加评论,请登录

mySociety的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了