FOD#53a: Google’s moat against OpenAI + See you at Microsoft Build
TuringPost
Newsletter about AI and ML. ?? Sign up for free to get your list of essential AI resources ??
Google I/O, OpenAI drama, Microsoft Build + the best curated list of research papers and other reads
Wow. This week is going to be hot! I’m in Seattle right now to cover Microsoft Build and bring you insights from Kevin Scott, Microsoft's CTO.
Since it's all very exciting and reportage is a completely different thing than just a pure analysis based on 150+ newsletters and media well-read, we are changing our usual schedule. This week, you will receive two FODs:
Are you also in Seattle? Let me know, maybe we can catch up for a coffee.
Google’s moat against OpenAI?
Last week saw two big tech events: the OpenAI Spring updates and Google I/O. We covered OpenAI’s impressive presentation of GPT-4o and thought OpenAI would “rest on their laurels,” but by the end of the week, a few notable resignations occurred. Ilya Sutskever, Jan Leike, and Evan Morikawa left the company. When many scientific personnel depart, it often indicates a shift in favor of product-oriented priorities, which is concerning, considering OpenAI’s goal to achieve not-fully specified AGI. It’s sad that while delivering so much, they are also notable for frequent drama and reactive damage control.
This brings us to Google. After their updates last week during Google I/O, some observers noted that Google, which hasn't partnered with any foundation model builders (such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, etc.), is catching up quickly. Considering the turmoil at OpenAI, it’s safe to say that Google’s moat – initially perceived as a disadvantage – lies in their size and history. Google is a large, established tech company with diversified revenue streams, demonstrating financial stability and consistent growth. It’s basically drama-free. Sundar Pichai is well-paced and plays a very long-term game. He and Google might seem to move slower at first, but they have tremendous ML talent, developed infrastructure, and business applications for their AI. Google's steady, methodical approach could prove to be more resilient in the long run.
But, there are different opinions as well. Stratechery argues that weaknesses emerge in Google's innovation pipeline outside its core competencies. The disappointment highlighted during the Google I/O keynote, for instance, stems from what appears to be a series of underdeveloped new products that do not yet match the transformative impact of its existing technologies. Additionally, many of Google's ambitious projects, such as AI Agents and Project Astra, are still at a conceptual stage without immediate practical applications, leading to perceptions of them as vaporware. These initiatives show potential but also reveal a gap between Google's visionary presentations and their current practical implementations. This gap may affect Google's ability to maintain its innovative edge against rapidly evolving competitors in the AI space.
Google I/O 2024 was, of course, a showcase of the company's deepening commitment to AI. Here are highlights:
Gemini Enhancements & Integrations:
Generative AI Innovations:
Search & Information Access Improvements
Hardware
领英推荐
Overall, Google I/O 2024 underscored the company's focus on making AI more accessible, powerful, and integrated into everyday tools and experiences. The event set the stage for a future where AI plays an even more significant role in how we interact with technology and information.
Google I/O Keynote:
Twitter Library
News from The Usual Suspects ?
Microsoft’s turn to shine
Hugging Face’s cool launches
Some good news from OpenAI
In other newsletters:
BTW, you might also like this episode about ImageNet. Read it here, It’s free
The freshest research papers were published. We categorized for your convenience ????