The flywheel and the slywheel

The flywheel and the slywheel

A flywheel multiplies value, a "slywheel" obfuscates it. If you can’t get a flywheel effect going within your organization, it might be because there’s a slywheel effect at play.?

No alt text provided for this image
The initiative runway

A slywheel is easy to miss. To the untrained eye, it doesn’t even look like a wheel. It looks like a nice smooth runway from which initiatives take flight. The slywheel begins to appear when you ask, “What value has it delivered?”

No alt text provided for this image
Slywheel 1

The classic enterprise does not ask this question at all. Initiatives are funded based on promises of value but there is no validation later. That’s a spray-and-pray approach to investing in initiatives.

No alt text provided for this image
Spray and Pray

A spray-and-pray approach has other adverse side-effects. It ends up bloating the tech landscape and therefore the tech budget. In good times, budget bloat might lead to a transformation initiative getting funded. In the not-so-good times, bloated budgets simply get cut. More of the slywheel reveals itself.

No alt text provided for this image
Slywheel 2

2023 is already shaping up to be a year of cuts.

But the years leading up to 2023 were different. Transformation initiatives did get funded. Unfortunately, they did not deliver as much as they could have, had they paid attention to both, tech delivery and benefits validation. Instead, they fixated on the former and neglected the latter. Value was anyone's guess.

No alt text provided for this image
Only tech transformation isn't enough

When money is easy to come by, we tend to squander. Startups fell into the same trap. They spent on too many initiatives (product variations, features) without proper feedback loops. This is not about experimentation. It is about making a habit of assessing commercial impact of efforts.

There is growing recognition of the slywheel. I see it in how leaders receive the Business Impact Retrospectives method today. Although the method ensures both effective and efficient use of innovation capital, when I shared it earlier, a leader in the startup ecosystem questioned the need for it, saying startups don’t need to worry about the efficient use of capital available for innovation. Hopefully they don’t think so anymore.

Until next time, take care and prosper.

Sriram

agileorgdesign.com

Newsletter Home

ramaswami subramanian

B.Sc at Mumbai University Mumbai

2 年

Very rewheeling?

Bob Goodman

Award-Winning Product Design & Strategy Leader | Alum: Virgin, Microsoft, Havas | Driving Growth Through High-Value Customer Experience

2 年

I think of it as the “build, ship, pray” method. It also misses the investment in the enabling tech and process runway that accelerates future releases.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sriram Narayan的更多文章

  • Focus on what: Process or Outcome?

    Focus on what: Process or Outcome?

    It is a question of means and ends. Should you focus on the process (means) or the outcome (ends)? Or both? Corporate…

    2 条评论
  • The Fog of Impact

    The Fog of Impact

    Imagine a multiplayer video game in which players compete to shoot goblins that appear in a foggy landscape. Some…

    2 条评论
  • Has Agile Killed the Business Case?

    Has Agile Killed the Business Case?

    If you are a single-product startup, you probably don’t need to write a business case for every new feature or…

    6 条评论
  • Don’t grow into Product and Engineering

    Don’t grow into Product and Engineering

    A startup usually begins life as a single-digit strong team with no boundaries. As they grow, they might soon find…

    9 条评论
  • Jugaad Product Development

    Jugaad Product Development

    Any business leader will tell you that regular product development takes too long. Setting hard deadlines rarely works.

    5 条评论
  • Guns and Deadlines

    Guns and Deadlines

    Does the practice of setting hard deadlines improve the predictability of software delivery? It depends on the team…

    4 条评论
  • How to transform the agile CoE

    How to transform the agile CoE

    Agility in innovation is a great marker of business agility. Innovation lead time for digital capabilities is the time…

    1 条评论
  • The agile CoE is about to die

    The agile CoE is about to die

    Update March 2023: Also see a follow-up post to this one here, titled "How to transform the agile CoE" Capital One, a…

    25 条评论
  • Visualizing Paths to Value

    Visualizing Paths to Value

    Customer obsession doesn’t always contribute to commercial success–the previous post made this point. Which means it…

    2 条评论
  • Commercial Impact Trumps Customer Obsession

    Commercial Impact Trumps Customer Obsession

    My previous post shared a way for technology leaders (Product, Data, Digital, or Engineering) to engage with commercial…

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了