Flood Insurance: An American Nightmare, With a Side of Absurdity

Flood Insurance: An American Nightmare, With a Side of Absurdity

Flood Insurance: An American Nightmare, With a Side of Absurdity

Flood insurance—a real-life American nightmare. I had the dubious honor of a front-row seat to one of the most bizarre Catch-22s in the world, and trust me, it’s a performance you don’t want to attend. It all began when I accidentally bought a house in a “hundred-year flood plain,” which sounds safe until you realize it’s just code for “once-in-a-lifetime disaster waiting to happen.” The details of that transaction will be the focus of another post, for when you need a laugh or a lesson.

The real kicker here is how our friendly neighborhood insurance companies—those bastions of compassion and clarity—have decided to play their latest round of flood dodgeball. They’ve been turning down flood claims faster than you can say “category five,” and what’s their excuse? “Oh, you should’ve bought flood insurance!” Brilliant, right? Except here’s the inconvenient truth: you "can’t" buy flood insurance unless you live in a designated flood plain.

But fear not, because Uncle Sam, in his infinite bureaucratic wisdom, will sell you flood insurance… "only" if FEMA’s hydrological fortune tellers have cursed your property.

And so, there I was, proudly (and naively) standing on my hundred-year flood plain—translation: a place where the odds of getting flooded were supposedly 1 in 100. Those seemed like decent odds back in the day, when “climate change” was still something people debated, rather than the daily reality of melting ice caps, disappearing coastlines, and, well, flood zones that no longer care about your quaint little “hundred-year” predictions. I thought I’d practically won the anti-lottery. Little did I know that climate change had a nasty habit of turning winners into losers overnight.?

So now, my hundred-year floodplain has gone from a statistical anomaly to a place where I half expect to be navigating the living room by canoe. And speaking of water-world realities, let’s take a moment to appreciate that immortal quote from the stable genius himself: "Rising oceans will create more beachfront property!" Sure, Donald. Who wouldn’t want to live in Venice, New Jersey, where gondolas are the primary mode of transportation?

But I digress. Let’s get back to some real wisdom, courtesy of General Russell Honore, who has a much more sensible take on the situation: “If you can see water from your house, congratulations, you’re in a flood zone.” No maps are necessary, folks. Forget those outdated charts designating hundred-, five-hundred-, or even thousand-year floodplains. The new rule of thumb? If you can spot a puddle, start shopping for a kayak and flood insurance—oh wait, you can’t, unless the government decides you’re worthy.?

This brings me to my recommendation, one that might seem crazy but makes perfect sense in today’s topsy-turvy climate: Why not just treat "all" land as a floodplain? Yes, you heard me. Let’s not pretend anymore. The old lines and categories are out-of-date, thanks to climate change rewriting the rules of nature. Whether it’s the hundred-year, five-hundred-year, or thousand-year flood plain—let’s just lump it all together and admit that Mother Nature doesn’t care about our carefully drawn maps. If you’re on this planet, you’re in a flood zone. Period.

And while we’re at it, how about expanding flood insurance to everyone, everywhere? Think of it as insurance against the inevitable. Call it the “puddle plan,” because we know that thanks to climate change, any place with a water feature—be it a charming creek or a storm drain that occasionally burps up rainwater—could be the next Atlantis. After all, if we’re living in a world where beachfront property is showing up in landlocked towns, it’s time we adjust our insurance policies accordingly. That way, we can all sleep soundly at night, knowing we’re covered when the next deluge arrives.

Flood insurance for the masses! Because in today’s world, the only thing crazier than buying a house in a flood plain is thinking you’re safe just because you don’t live in one. Thanks, climate change, for turning us all into amateur meteorologists, cartographers, and—unfortunately—paddle enthusiasts.


JOE DOYLE

Business Development Manager Eastern U.S and Eastern Canada at HDA Truck Pride

5 个月

30 yrs ago in our 20's with 4 children we purchased our 1st house in a flood plain with mandatory flood insurance. Homeowners insurance was $250 and government regulated flood insurance pricing was $749. Well our 100 years were up and our house which was a tri-level flooded the lower floor which was only about 3 feet below ground. This was not a basement but flood insurance considers it as one and doesn't cover a finished basement. Our bathroom, laundry, and children's bedrooms were destroyed. $20K in damage in 1995 prices and insurance paid $0. TV crews walked straight through our open doors as we drug everything into the yard to dry and asked how did I feel?? Seriously?? I had not slept in days and before I could answer they asked to borrow a canoe to broadcast in the 2ft of water in the backyard making it look like it was 10 ft deep. Drama factor! Behind the camera all water had receded 2 days before! ?? Nothing like your time to be a star on TV being so irritating and no bath for days. 4yrs later we adopted 4 more children overnight. With 8 kids we had to buy 15 pass. vans, 2 washers & dryers, and build bedrooms.What felt like a tornado made us forget about the flood.?? Hope this helps others. Read the fine print!

Anyone can buy flood insurance, they sell it to get the benefit of large numbers as it's a monoline policy in most cases. Not sure the confusion of 100 year flood zones, they are clearly disclosed and any morgage or lenders will require it unless there is equity exceeding policy limits.

回复
John Barbatano

Water Resource Engineering | Riverscape Restoration

5 个月

In my experience the bigger problem is an epidemic of flood models which have not been updated in decades, often since the 1980s. By modern standards they're shockingly coarse and primitive, and they don't account for the land use changes in the watershed or structural changes in the floodways over the intervening decades. The models are out of date in part because communities intentionally avoid updating them. Floodplain remapping can be time-consuming, costly, and politically fraught, and communities have little incentive to update hydrologic analyses to acknowledge land use changes or climate shifts that have increased discharges. The revealed preference is to instead accept misrepresentation of the flood risk, and then point to FEMA's wrong flood maps when folks are surprised by flooding frequency or flooding extents. We also have many smaller streams which are not mapped, extensive development in historic, flood-prone wetlands, and so on. Mapped floodplains and other Special Flood Hazard Areas report only a subset of the areas which might flood during extreme weather. Climate change is upsetting the climatological assumptions underlying FEMA's models and FEMA's maps, but the problem goes much deeper than that, I'm afraid.

Bob Rutherford

"Truck Stop Philosopher & Troubleshooter | Empowering Problem Solvers with AI-Powered Training & Tools Based on Dr. Deming's Philosophy | 'The Politics of Business and the Business of Politics'" I Please Click Below.

5 个月
Amol Sagar

| Market Researcher | Creative Writer | Sustainable Solutionist | Inventor | Innovator | Consumer Behaviour Enthusiast | 5 Business Ideas |

5 个月

Bob Rutherford Climate Is Changing

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Bob Rutherford的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了