FloatControl improved Goldratt’s CCPM method by making buffers redundant

One of the major hurdles within critical chain project management (CCPM) is setting of buffers. If it’s not possible to estimate the duration of an activity when you’ll be done (everybody includes buffers according to Goldratt), then how is it even possible to give a duration with a 50% chance you’ll have finished your activity? That value is used to set buffers within Goldratt's CCPM method.

To overcome this problem, I’ve designed the progress process (explained in more depth on my website or flyer (posted on Linked-In)). Every team member may set a duration as wished, but after an analysis the activities on the critical path are discussed. The member will be asked what’s needed to succeed (limit risk) and what's needed to have an as short as possible duration (for example arrange a task that’s planned in parallel to delay or handed off to a colleague).

When these activities (which are on the critical path) are discussed in the team meeting, the entire team knows what the critical path is and to which activities they should give priority. You don’t need to set buffers anymore and you’ll succeed with a shorter critical path. Sounds simple, not? Contact me if you want to experience this method.