The Five Whys
Michael Rhiness
Creating Value in Healthcare and Beyond | Committed to Empowering Teams, Shaping Purpose-Driven Organizations, and Building Healthier Communities
As a leader, you have likely encountered problems that won’t go away no matter how you try to fix them. You may have tried different solutions, but they all seem inadequate. Systems thinking is the ideal approach to problem-solving that looks at the big picture and the interconnectedness of various elements within the system. One of the core techniques of systems thinking is the Five Whys, a simple but powerful tool that gets to the root cause of a problem.
The Five Whys technique was developed by Sakichi Toyoda, the founder of Toyota Industries, and was later incorporated into the Toyota Production System. The method became famous for its effectiveness in identifying the root causes of manufacturing issues, leading to more efficient and reliable production processes. Over time, the technique's simplicity and power made it popular beyond the manufacturing sector.
Steps to Implement the Five Whys
Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Superficial answers disrupt the effectiveness of the Five Whys technique. When asking "why," it is easy to stop at the first or second layer of questioning, which yields only surface-level insights. To avoid this, commit to digging deeper with each "why" to reach the true root cause of the problem. For example, if a manufacturing defect occurs, do not stop at the first explanation, such as "the machine malfunctioned." Continue to ask why the machine malfunctioned, why it was not maintained, and so on, until the fundamental issue is revealed, such as inadequate maintenance protocols or insufficient training for the operators.
Blame culture derails the Five Whys process. In environments where employees fear repercussions, they won’t provide honest answers, instead blaming colleagues or external factors. To counter this, transparency and accountability within the leadership team must be demanded. Encourage everyone to focus on identifying and solving systemic issues rather than assigning blame. For instance, examine the processes and support structures when a project fails rather than replace the project manager. Was the timeline realistic? Were the resources adequate? Addressing the root causes creates a more constructive and solution-oriented environment.
Incomplete implementation of the identified actions will lead to continued problems. Once the root cause is identified, developing a comprehensive action plan and following through with it is non-negotiable. Set clear objectives, assign responsibilities, and monitor progress. For example, if the root cause of customer dissatisfaction is slow response times, an action plan might include hiring additional support staff, introducing response time metrics, and regularly reviewing performance. The effectiveness of these measures must be monitored, and adjustments made as necessary.
Consider these scenarios to illustrate further the importance of addressing these pitfalls. The team investigates the cause of recurring bugs in a software development company. The team identified that the bugs were due to insufficient testing, so the company hired additional quality assurance engineers. However, the implementation is incomplete because the developers continue to work without structured testing procedures. The initial step of hiring more staff is a positive move, but without complete implementation, such as establishing standardized testing protocols and providing training, the problem persists.
Similarly, in a customer service setting, an organization finds that customer complaints are frequently related to the late delivery of products. The first "why" reveals that the delivery update software is slow, so drivers aren’t receiving prompt notifications of route changes. Asking another “why” shows that the company hasn’t upgraded its network speeds and is operating below industry-standard bandwidth speeds.? Asking further "whys" uncovers that a single person manually updates the platform leading to inefficiencies. If the company decides to invest in increased network speeds but does not follow through with automation upgrades or additional staff, the delivery issues will continue.
Circling back to the original problem is a red flag in the Five Whys process. If an answer to one of your "whys" leads back to the initial problem, it indicates that the questioning path is incorrect or an answer along the way was inaccurate.
Why are we not completing our studies as quickly as other companies? Because we only have one person working on them and they have other responsibilities. Why is there only one person working on them who is overburdened? Because we don't have enough people. Why don't we have enough people? Because we don't have enough capital to hire more. Why don't we have enough capital? Because investors aren't interested in funding us. Why aren't investors interested? Because we haven't completed any studies.
This loop returns you to the original problem without finding a root cause. Instead, try a different path.
Why are we not completing our studies as quickly as other companies? Because we only have one person working on them and they have additional responsibilities. Why is there only one person working on them who is overburdened? Because they won't let other people help. Why won't they let other people help? Because they believe they are the only person who can do it. Why do they think this? Because they have trust and control issues.
This path leads to a root cause that can be addressed with actionable steps, such as reassigning workload to other stakeholders. It avoids endless loops and provides practical solutions to underlying issues.
Ask Why Scenarios
Your sales have declined over the past few months.
Why 1: Why have our sales been declining?
Answer: Our products are no longer popular with customers.
Why 2: Why are our products no longer popular with customers?
Answer: Our competitors are offering more innovative and lower-priced products.
Why 3: Why can't we offer more innovative and lower-priced products?
Answer: Our manufacturing costs are too high.
Why 4: Why are our manufacturing costs too high?
Answer: We have yet to invest in new technology to improve automation and reduce costs.
Why 5: Why have we yet to invest in new technology?
Answer: We've been focused on short-term profits and have yet to make a case for long-term investment.
A hospital is experiencing a high rate of patient readmissions.
Why 1: Why are we experiencing a high rate of patient readmissions?
Answer: Patients are not following their treatment plans.
Why 2: Why are patients not following their treatment plans?
Answer: They are confused about their medications.
Why 3: Why are they confused about their medications?
Answer: They are receiving conflicting information from multiple healthcare providers.
Why 4: Why are they receiving conflicting information?
领英推荐
Answer: Our healthcare providers are not communicating effectively with each other.
Why 5: Why are our healthcare providers not communicating effectively?
Answer: There is no standardized process for sharing patient information between providers.
Quality Control
When a product fails to meet quality standards, asking why five times reveals the root cause.
Workplace Safety
Investigate an accident or near-miss incident by asking why five times to prevent future occurrences.
Project Delays
When a project falls behind schedule, using the "ask why five times" technique uncovers the underlying causes
Customer Complaints
Resolving recurring customer complaints is achieved by asking why five times to identify the root cause.
Employee Turnover
Addressing high employee turnover requires understanding the underlying reasons.
Decreased Sales Performance
Low Conversion Rates
Customer Churn
Pricing Complaints
Declining Market Share
New Product Launch Failure
Ineffective Strategic Partnerships
Competitive Disruption