Five Tips For Laboratory Informatics Product Selections

Recently, I was working on a software product selection and when I started making the list of software products to put in the process, it was not the first time that I noticed they were all offering the same features.

Let us stop and be honest about this - at this point, after all these years of laboratory informatics software, many vendors are offering many of the same features. Yet, that does not mean we still cannot find ways to select one product over another.

I have been doing product selections for years and I will tell you that it is not nearly as hard as you think it is. Of course it is easier for me having worked with so many customers to do this. But if you are trying to do it, yourself, do not feel overwhelmed. There are ways to tackle this.

1. Wading Through The Alphabet Soup of Laboratory Informatics With Requirements

We have a laboratory informatics alphabet soup of LIMS, ELN, LES, LIS, SDMS, and more. Too often, potential software customers try to figure out what these mean. The bottom line is that they do not actually mean anything. A product sold as a LIMS might also be sold as an LES, for example. Forget about the acronyms. Gather your requirements and see what products match.

Note: Right about here, I would normally tell you what these acronyms mean. It really does not matter so much so that I will not waste the space on it.

This is where I always tell you to gather your requirements, first. Gathering your requirements will help you understand the first set of criteria you need to look for. In fact, if you have too many to look for, go through and prioritize them. I am not kidding but many of you will be shocked how much this clarifies the rest of the process. And, for those where it does not clarify it that much, there are more helpful steps, so keep reading.

As just one example, if you need to find a product with stability features, and if it is a high priority, you probably would not bother looking at products that do not have that feature.

2. Requirements Are Not Just Features

If your requirements only list features that you need in your system, you will still be stuck, right about now. There will still be too many products to select from.

Do not forget to include all of your other requirements. If you have any legal requirements, regulatory requirements, data reporting requirements, analytics requirements, support requirements, system requirements, hosting requirements, or any other item that has nothing to do with an actual feature, include those. As a group, these are called "non-functional requirements." However, I do not personally always put these into a single group. I often specifically put system requirements together and find groups for some of the others, separate from that.

As yet another tip, if you do not want to include them in your requirements document, you can have a supporting document that is separate. But keep them close together.

3. Requirements Are Not Just for Today But For the Future

Here is where I want to remind you all of something really important - you are not just listing requirements for what you want to implement, today. This is not just meant for you to dump your processes and data into this new piece of software and start operating, today.

These systems are expensive. The licenses are just a drop in the bucket compared to what it costs to implement and maintain them. With that, some of the requirements I add are specific to helping the customer understand what it will take to maintain this system so that it runs efficiently for the future.

This is why I always include questions around what it takes to make changes to the system. Does it require programming, such as C# or Java, for example? Can you do it, yourself, or does the software vendor have to charge you to do it? Understanding all this helps you understand the types of people you need to contract or hire and what type of budget you need to manage the system.

Where I talk about maintenance, keep in-mind your system will grow. Today, it might perform well. Next year as your company grows, will it be too slow? Proper and ongoing maintenance activities are meant to deal with these types of issues. By the way, this is hard work. It is not easy to do. Do not wait until you have these issues to start thinking about this. It is not something you can accomplish overnight.

4. Requirements are Not RFPs/RFQs

Now, I want to tell you that requirements are not your RFP (Request For Proposal) or RFQ (Request For Quote). If you are regulated, and even if you are not, your requirements are meant as a list that you can track back to your test matrix. You will adjust them at a certain point to reflect the system you actually implemented and how or whether it meets various requirements. It will not meet every requirement on your original list, especially in Phase 1 of your implementation.

But back to RFPs/RFQs - ask open-ended questions. For example, if you have twenty stability requirements, do not ask twenty stability questions. Instead, just ask the vendor to describe how their stability features work. You might then ask for more details based on the specific types of studies you work with. However, it is easier to ask what a system offers and try to think whether it manages your own studies in a manner that you find practical. Once you understand the basics, then, you can ask more questions.

Alternately, there are times when we do not really care that much about how something works. For those of you who are still using mainly contract manufacturing or contract labs and do not yet need to handle certain features on your own, this is where you can ask more general questions.

Then, if you think you want a specific set of features for the future, but do not know what you will need, just ask it as a yes or no question, such as, "Does this system provide an environmental monitoring module? If not, in a few sentences, describe how this system could be used to manage that." In that, you at least have an idea what is offered, even though you are not yet ready for those features

5. Understanding COTS Systems

COTS stands for Commercial Off The Shelf. These are systems that come with some pre-built features but which require quite a lot of work to make properly operational within your own company.

Purchasing and implementing them is vastly different from having custom (bespoke) software written for you and vastly different from purchasing smaller, more specific software that you merely install and deploy.

If you do not understand this, this is where you will misunderstand how to deploy and how to maintain your new system. This is where you will either not ask the right questions when you make your purchase or you will not fully understand the responses you get back. In that, your selection process has just failed.

Finally: Cradle to Grave

Whether your system is a regulated system or not, consider everything you do takes your system from the cradle to the grave. It takes you from the day you decide to spend money to buy something to the day you retire the system.

That period of time will either help your company greatly, possibly preparing you for Lab 4.0, or it will be a horrible experience that bleeds money and takes more resources than you imagined for a system that barely supports what it needs to.

Take what I said above to heart. Where upper management or people you are delivering to do not believe what you are telling them, just do your best. These are tough concepts to get across. I know a lot of you have told me how frustrated you are, and how hard it is to know all this but not be able to get anyone to believe you, if you are the expert trying to accomplish this.

It might not help you to know that I believe you and many others out there are rooting for you. Yet, maybe that is all you will get, today, and it will HAVE to be enough.

Greg Hoffman

Retired (Chemical Informatics) at Last

2 年

Vendors will very frequently answer "yes" to most questions couched as "can the software do <whatever>". Because that is probably right. But it is the "how is it done / how does it work / show me" that will really answer your question. Is it core functionality? Is it some special/extra add-on? A combination of operations that together kinda does what you want? And do you share the same definition of the words you are using?

Mark Newton

Owner at Heartland QA

2 年

Yes! Have seen numerous examples where products were selected for the look of the interface, rather than the functionality; in some cases, it resulted in wasting money on a product that will never (or cannot ever) be used in the business environment. You cannot objectively compare products without list of requirements.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gloria Slomczynski MBA的更多文章

  • The Issue of Paper in Our Technology and Innovation Management

    The Issue of Paper in Our Technology and Innovation Management

    Returning to my turntable analogy, we can still buy brand new turntables and with with more modern technology, along…

    2 条评论
  • Managing Your Technology as a "Stack"

    Managing Your Technology as a "Stack"

    Recently, I received the results of a survey asking whether companies thought their tech stack was being properly…

    3 条评论
  • Managing Technology and Innovation

    Managing Technology and Innovation

    In writing about managing technology and innovation, I will start at the beginning. In this article, I will cover a few…

    2 条评论
  • Change is the Only Constant

    Change is the Only Constant

    For many of us, our careers have been full of change. As we switch jobs, do some consulting work, move to a new area -…

    12 条评论
  • 2024 Resourcing Problems to Solve in 2025

    2024 Resourcing Problems to Solve in 2025

    I happened to read this post from Bob McDowall regarding antiquities, as well as the article attached to his post…

    3 条评论
  • #opentowork as a Consulting/Job Hunting Tool

    #opentowork as a Consulting/Job Hunting Tool

    Some of you reading this are the same people who will have seen that I re-applied the #opentowork banner on my LinkedIn…

    5 条评论
  • Enabling Laboratory and Other Business IT

    Enabling Laboratory and Other Business IT

    In meeting people from various walks of the scientific and IT worlds, it occurs to me that they tend to fall into one…

    2 条评论
  • End-of-Year Trends

    End-of-Year Trends

    As usual, those of us who are looking to stay busy in 2025 tend to touch base to compare notes with each other…

    3 条评论
  • Data Integrity - Still Comes Down to Us

    Data Integrity - Still Comes Down to Us

    Many of you reading this newsletter are on a schedule of training modules that automatically pop into your schedule…

    2 条评论
  • My Job: Doing Versus Writing

    My Job: Doing Versus Writing

    No-one pays me to write articles. Writing is not my job, in and of itself.

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了