Five takeaways from the 6th IPCC report that every company should know ?
Eight years have passed since climate negotiators in Paris agreed to keep the temperature rise well below 2 degrees Celsius and strive for 1.5 degrees. Last week’s Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) from the IPCC is a sobering update on how far current climate actions are falling short of reaching that goal. The report’s troubling message may sound familiar. Still, it does so with unprecedented force and confidence, erasing any scientific doubt that the next decade will be crucial to avoid severe disruptions of our climate and ecosystems.??
In IPCC’s words: “There is a rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a livable and sustainable future for all (very high confidence),” Five takeaways from the report.??
Ironclad scientific consensus and the challenge got bigger??
The scientific certainty about the precarious state of our climate has soared since the fifth IPCC report, with scientists making most observations with high or very high confidence. It’s now beyond any reasonable doubt that “climate change is a threat to human well-being and planetary health.” Scientists also note that extreme weather events and biodiversity loss are triggered at much lower temperatures than they assumed just eight years ago.??
Mitigation needs to go into high gear?
“All global modeled pathways that limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius with no or limited overshoot,” the IPCC writes, “and those that limit warming to 2 degrees, involve rapid and deep and, in most cases, immediate greenhouse gas emissions reductions in all sectors this decade (high confidence).” The report also puts numbers on it: limiting warming to 1.5 degrees takes a 43 percent reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 (compared to 2019) and a 21 percent cut to stay below 2 degrees. All current national reduction plans (NDCs) combined put the world on a 2.8 degrees trajectory. Correcting for flawed implementation, that number goes up to 3.2 degrees warming.???
Adaptation is paramount, but getting harder?
The IPCC notes that much damage – from rising sea levels to extreme weather – is already irreversible, and “vulnerable communities who have historically contributed the least to current climate change are disproportionately affected (high confidence).” But relying on adaptation at the expense of mitigation would be a mistake. “Every increment of global warming will intensify multiple and concurrent hazards,” the IPCC concludes, “Adaptation options that are feasible and effective today will become constrained and less effective with increasing global warming. Losses and damages will increase, and additional human and natural systems will reach adaptation limits (high confidence).”?
领英推荐
Climate resilient development is the solution, but it needs more funds?
The IPCC sees climate resilient development, which integrates adaptation and mitigation, as the only way forward. “Deep, rapid, and sustained mitigation and accelerated implementation of adaptation actions in this decade would reduce projected losses and damages for humans and ecosystems (very high confidence), and deliver many co-benefits, especially for air quality and health (high confidence).” But the financial system is ill-equipped to deliver. “Both adaptation and mitigation financing would need to increase many-fold. There is sufficient global capital to close the global investment gaps, but there are barriers to redirect capital to climate action (high confidence).?
Nature will play a lead role in net-zero strategies?
Net-zero strategies should focus on ambitious short-term goals, according to the IPCC. “Transitioning towards net zero CO2 emissions faster and reducing non-CO2 emissions such as methane more rapidly would limit peak warming levels and reduce the requirement for net negative CO2 emissions, thereby reducing feasibility and sustainability concerns, and social and environmental risks associated with Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) deployment at large scale (high confidence).” IPCC identified nature and agriculture as significant sources of untapped mitigation potential, particularly soil carbon sequestration and reduced conversion or restoration of natural ecosystems.???
The sixth IPCC report is not pulling any punches: companies, governments, and consumers must take decisive climate action in the next decade. It offers a clear roadmap to stave off crippling disruptions and depicts - with unprecedented scientific certainty - the life-shattering consequences if we don’t. Pointing to a lack of scientific consensus is no longer a tenable excuse for inaction.??
?
Digital Excellence & Solutions Partner. Open Connector. Lifelong Athlete. | Sustainability Advocate. | Best Boston Bachelor 2025.
1 年Robert LaCount Thanks for sharing! It seems like, once again, the two biggest challenges remain the same. 1. Top-down: The barriers to redirecting capital to climate action. 2. Bottom-up: Relying on adaptation at the expense of mitigation.
Independant Environmental and Social Impact Consultant
1 年Thanks for sharing Robert LaCount! Given your takeaways from the IPCC report, I am curious to hear how you think that ERM should position themselves regarding their work on up stream oil and gas projects?
Reimagining Food Systems / Sustainable Impact
1 年Part 1 Thank you for sharing this informative post, Robert. One of the significant opportunities to cut down on emissions, that haven't been fully explored that the IPCC report identified, is agriculture, particularly supporting small-scale farmers. Small-scale farming offers immediate solutions to several issues, such as reducing CO2-intensive exports of food to Africa and limiting CO2 imports of synthetic fertilizers. Additionally, promoting the adoption of climate-smart indigenous crops and revitalizing soils to hold water can significantly mitigate climate change. Moreover, small-scale farming can help shift from fossil fuels to solar energy, which can further reduce emissions.? Frankly, what is lacking is WILL by the Global North (lead by Europe) to support small-scale African farmers.? We have lots of knowledge and volition but very little action. Often what action is there comes from an ingrained posture of condescending, patronizing and superior attitudes towards African agriculture.
Reimagining Food Systems / Sustainable Impact
1 年Part 2 It's frustrating to see that so many leaders and power brokers clearly understand that we need to address the climate crisis, and they even know the solutions. Why is that?? Well…they're stuck in cognitive dissonance. This means that they deny the need for change because it conflicts with their entrenched view of the world. They're unable to make a paradigm shift in their thinking, and this is holding back stakeholders in African agriculture from being disruptive and considering new paradigms, such as focusing on small-scale farmers and regenerative sustainable agriculture. They fear change and losing comfort.? It turns out that Cognitive Dissonance is a very common human trait, and we're all susceptible to it. It's the mental discomfort we experience when we hold two or more contradictory beliefs, values, or ideas. In the case of climate change, many leaders and power brokers are aware of this dire issue and its solutions, but they're also invested in maintaining the status quo. This creates a psychological conflict that they can't reconcile. So they deny deny deny.
Reimagining Food Systems / Sustainable Impact
1 年Part 3 I suggest that we identify and educate leaders about their specific cognitive dissonances and encourage leaders and power brokers to embrace new ways of thinking about agriculture in Africa. We need to help them see that change is necessary and that regenerative sustainable agriculture is not only good for the planet, but also good for people and profits. By working together, we can make the disruptive shift necessary.?? #sustainablefarming #agroecology #foodsecurity #soilhealth #smallholderfarmers #agroforestry #climatesmartagriculture #sustainability #soilhealth #mali #africa #biodiversity