As First Republic falls, it’s decision-time for the Fed

As First Republic falls, it’s decision-time for the Fed

Last week I wrote that the banking mini-crisis appears to have subsided, although it was clear that investors were still apprehensive about at least some regional banks. Well, the situation resurged with a vengeance last week after regional bank First Republic reported its first-quarter earnings — and a plunge in deposits. Over the weekend, we got news that First Republic was seized by US regulators and is being taken over by JPMorgan Chase. However, the situation continues to appear to be idiosyncratic rather than systemic. Following is a summary of what we’ve learned about the banking sector during earnings season thus far:

  • Revenue growth. So far, banks have reported or are expected to report revenue growth well above 10% for the first quarter.(1) That includes regional banks. The big money center banks have had generally better earnings reports, although all banks share some of the same headwinds (i.e., increasing loan loss provisions in anticipation of an economic slowdown and declining net interest margins).
  • Deposits. There has been a significant difference between big banks and regional banks when it comes to recent deposit flows. Big banks have seen deposits either increase or decrease within a relatively small range of 1%-3%.(2) Regional banks have reported a much larger range, but on average regional banks have seen a substantial decline in deposits since the crisis began in early March, although no others have reported the extreme outflows reported by First Republic last week.
  • Stock prices. It seems that regional bank stock prices are being driven not by earnings but by deposit flows; those with losses are being punished, but those whose deposits have stabilized or grown recently have been rewarded. For example, First Republic substantially beat earnings and revenue expectations for the first quarter despite a drop in net interest income. However, its stock fell dramatically on the news of its substantial deposit losses. Conversely, another bank, PacWest, reported last week that it modestly surpassed earnings expectations, but it also reported that its deposits stabilized toward the end of the quarter and have since grown in April — resulting in a meaningful stock price increase in recent days.

In my opinion, First Republic is an outlier due to the large percentage of deposits it has lost, which has dictated the fate of its stock price. And the reason it has experienced a high level of deposit outflows is the unique nature of the client base – like Silicon Valley Bank, it had a high percentage of uninsured deposits (approximately 70%)(3) because of its high net worth clientele.?

Are more regional bank issues ahead?

So where do we go from here? There could be more regional bank issues, but I believe they are likely to be very isolated given the relatively unique set of characteristics that have led to such severe problems for Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank.

In general, we think that banks will face an increasingly adverse operating environment as rates reach their cyclical peak. This is to be expected: In the past, net margins peaked around the time the US yield curve inverted (and this appears to be the case this time). As such, the general outlook for the banking industry is somewhat negative in the shorter term given a potential slowdown in growth, tightening credit, and compressing net interest margins as competition for deposits increases.

Credit conditions are tightening

I continue to believe the most significant outcome from the banking crisis is that credit conditions are tightening. It was reported in the latest Federal Reserve Beige Book that, in general, economic activity remained steady, but credit conditions were tightening in a number of districts. For example, the Dallas Fed reported that “Loan demand weakened further, loan volumes fell, and credit conditions tightened,” while the San Francisco Fed noted that “Lending standards tightened notably, and several depository institutions opted to reduce loan volumes, especially for new clients, despite reporting ample liquidity.”(4)

Additionally, the latest American Bankers Association Credit Conditions Index shows that bank economists anticipate significantly weaker credit market conditions and tighter credit standards over the next six months.(5) However, I hope this could be a bad news/good news story as it could compel the US Federal Reserve to stop hiking rates since its work is being done for it with the tightening of credit conditions.

Looking ahead: What will the Fed do now?

And that bring us to this week. Some important data releases in coming days include the US employment situation report and the March Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, as we watch carefully for signs of wage pressures.

However, the most important event of the week will be the Federal Open Market Committee meeting. Most expect the Fed to hike rates by 25 basis points. I continue to hold out hope that the Fed will take a more prudent, cautious path and end rate hikes with a “conditional pause” or at least give us a “dovish hike,” increasing 25 basis points but communicating that this is the end of rate hikes. After a large number of aggressive rate hikes in a very short period of time, the Fed is, in my opinion, playing with fire if it continues on that path even though inflation is no longer hot and signs point to significant disinflation going forward.

With contributions from Andras Vig and Ashley Oerth

  1. Source: FactSet Earnings Insight, as of April 21, 2023
  2. Bloomberg, L.P. as of April 27, 2023
  3. Source: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as of April 30, 2023
  4. Source: Federal Reserve, April 19, 2023
  5. Source: American Bankers Association, “ABA Report: Bank Economists Expect Slowing Economic Growth to Tighten Credit Conditions,” April 6, 2023

Important information

NA2877578

Header image: Cecilie_Arcurs / Getty

Not a Deposit - Not FDIC Insured - Not Guaranteed by the Bank - May Lose Value - Not Insured by any Federal Government Agency

Invesco Distributors, Inc.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.

A loan loss provision is an accounting measure that is used to cover uncollected loans and loan payments.

Net interest margin is the difference between interest earned and interest paid, which gauges how successfully a company, typically a bank, made its investments relative to its debt situation.

The yield curve plots interest rates, at a set point in time, of bonds having equal credit quality but differing maturity dates to project future interest rate changes and economic activity. An inverted yield curve is one in which shorter-term bonds have a higher yield than longer-term bonds of the same credit quality. In a normal yield curve, longer-term bonds have a higher yield.

The Summary of Commentary on Current Economic Conditions by Federal Reserve District (commonly known as the Beige Book) is published eight times per year. Each Federal Reserve Bank gathers anecdotal information on current economic conditions in its district, and the Beige Book summarizes this information by district and sector.

The Credit Conditions Index is a suite of proprietary diffusion indices derived by the American Bankers Association from surveys of bank chief economists from major North American banking institutions.

The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics produces data on job openings, hires, and separations.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is a 12-member committee of the Federal Reserve Board that meets regularly to set monetary policy, including the interest rates that are charged to banks.

Tightening is a monetary policy used by central banks to normalize balance sheets.

A basis point is one hundredth of a percentage point.

The opinions referenced above are those of the author as of May 1, 2023. These comments should not be construed as recommendations, but as an illustration of broader themes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions; there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations.?

Ronald Shiffman

Respiratory Therapist at UNC Health

1 年

I have to disagree 100% with Christina Hooper's sanguine outlook for the banking industry. 1) The troubles at FRB were not idiosyncratic. They are systemic. 2) It is obvious that our banks are carrying massive unrealized losses on their books because of the long period banks went through of near zero interest rates and the short period of rapidly rising rates happening now. 3) Office buildings and commercial real estate are experiencing elevated vacancy rates and their refunding will have to happen at much higher rates interest putting stress on banks levered to commercial real estate.

Farhan Guled

Creative thinker and Financial inclusion expert. Passionate about Sustainability driven by the uniqueness of our community. I help you build investor ready & inclusive businesses for growth. Visionary (DrumsRhythmic)

1 年

Good insights for those of us in the global south

回复
CHESTER SWANSON SR.

Realtor Associate @ Next Trend Realty LLC | HAR REALTOR, IRS Tax Preparer

1 年

Thanks for the updates on, Weekly Market Compass.

Doc Worley

Barnabas Speaks Communications, Ltd #b3gblackmamba (Striking like The Cobra and Finessing like The Black Mamba)

1 年

I agree! I would definitely be looking at a pause after this foreseeable 25bp hike to come. With the tightening of banking credit and softening demands, the market will adjust accordingly and the economy which has been resilient will continue on that path.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kristina Hooper的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了