FinOps as a critical skill for Hybrid Cloud Management
Companies are under an ongoing pressure to contain technology costs.
According to McKinsey, here are the common pitfalls in FinOps, an emerging discipline and operating model for efficient cloud usage, to start at unit costs and optimize based on TCO. As we try to move towards a cost optimized cloud centric world, the five categories become even more important.
1. A wait-and-see strategy can be costly: granular visibility into spend, governance, forecasting, and optimization, until their annual cloud spend had reached $100 million.
2. Business executives get involved too late in the game: building effective cloud consumption capabilities with clear sponsorship from key business leaders from the start
3. Tactical activities are prioritized over higher-impact strategic initiatives: strategic programs such as providing unit economics, delivering accurate forecasts, guiding change management programs based on greatest value potential, and optimizing cloud spend practices
4. FinOps teams often lack crucial skill sets: predictive analytics skills to understand future demand, estimate unit economics for cloud usage, holistically optimize resource consumption
5. Companies have a limited understanding of cloud unit economics: clear relationship between cloud costs and business value at the use-case level
Also, the three pillars of business technology are:
Cloud native startups have shown the importance of business technology where their business relies mostly on the technology foundations.
FinOps is a way to tie back the value of each component in the technology atlas back to business P&L.
Let's look at fundamental principles of onboarding to cloud and the role of FinOps in that process:
In order for us to have a strong foundation for FinOps, we need to categorize resources. Companies need to use a cloud cost management tool to track the cloud usage and costs.
Diving deeper...
"Migrating to a cloud platform can be a confusing, time-consuming and expensive process. The IBM? Turbonomic? platform provides easy-to-use cloud migration planning that allows you to optimize your cloud consumption from the start and simplify your cloud migration process. Whether your organization is pursuing a cloud-first, hybrid cloud or multicloud strategy, Turbonomic software can deliver convenient cloud migration planning tools that can accelerate your digital transformation..." [2]
Turbonomic Migration plan optimization
Turbonomic software analyzes the real-time resource needs of application workloads, whether they’re cloud-based or running on-prem. The platform then delivers potential application migration plans that detail specific actions and indicate which cloud configurations will support your workloads if you take a “lift and shift” approach versus an approach that optimizes workloads as part of the migration. This migration assessment strategy can help with cost savings by avoiding expensive lift and shift migrations.
Turbonomic Discount-aware actions
Turbonomic software examines billing and price adjustments negotiated with your cloud service provider and creates migration plans that account for discounted pricing. These cloud migration plans include moving workloads from on-demand to discounted pricing through additional purchases (reserved instances and committed use discounts).
Turbonomic Guided workflows
The Turbonomic platform provides a guided workflow to help you configure different scenarios for your organization’s specific cloud solution use case. You can select which workloads you want to migrate and where in your cloud environment you want to migrate them to, as well as your discount pricing and licensing preferences. With these inputs, Turbonomic software then creates a migration plan in minutes.?
Turbonomic Optimized resource consumption:
Optimize workloads pre-migration, then assess the most appropriate cloud configurations for migration.
领英推荐
Turbonomic Quick configuration:
Guided workflows allow you to configure migration plans in minutes.
The Turbonomic platform differs from other cloud migration tools in that it enables organizations to better analyze the potential benefits and drawbacks of a “lift and shift migration” versus an optimized cloud adoption strategy. This detailed comparison can help you feel more confident in your cloud migration journey.
“Lift and shift” migrations match current on-premises VM instance and storage tiers to the closest equivalent?in the cloud. This method is typically faster, but can be more expensive and can risk?performance. Optimized migration strategies?examine VM?and storage historical utilization metrics to select the best VM/instance type and storage tier in the selected cloud provider’s region. This method?helps guarantee workload performance at the lowest cost. Turbonomic software provides detailed?plans for both migration strategies that organizations can compare and analyze down to each individual optimization action.
Here is a case study where Turbonomic evaluated a on-prem solution and its suitability to migrate to the cloud.
Case study:
A retailer which had workloads heavily weighted towards on-prem used Turbonomic to evaluate the "cloud readiness" of workloads based on potential cost savings.
The results are graphically depicted below:
Enter Apptio...
Apptio is aimed at additonal use cases:
?Multi-cloud and container cost visibility
?Detect anomalies and reduce waste
?Automate savings program coverage
?Track and allocate cloud total spend
?Drive unit economics and analyze customer profitability
Key features to look for in a FiOps tool
Using Apptio Cloudability 'TrueCostExplorer', your company can establish an effective cost allocation strategy to
Conclusion:
IBM Turbonomic and IBM Apptio not only identify cost saving opportunities in your existing cloud estate but also guides you in a FinOps exercise to determine which workloads are cloud beneficial.
Caveat: Opinions expressed are those of the author and not of IBM Corporation. No warranties express or implied.
Assistant Brand and Digital Manager at Mobilink Microfinance Bank
10 个月Good job at highlighting these pitfalls, Ramesh. I agree with all the points, and the second one really stood out. It’s so necessary for the companies’ leaders to be involved in this from the start, so that employees know the importance of giving attention to costs. Our mission at tampd is to solve this very problem. We aim at optimizing costs and reducing digital waste!