FINGER OF DEATH
Media and the Message; Part 3
“He either wishes to do what other people do, (conformism), or he does what other people wish him to do, (totalitarianism).
?Viktor E. Frankl, “Man's Search for Meaning”
A person who comes home from work; angry at his boss, and uses his pet dog as an outlet for his aggression by kicking him, is practising, “displaced aggression”. The dog’s done nothing wrong, but he’s being treated him as though he’s the culprit.
In Freudian psychology, displacement (German: Verschiebung, "shift, move") is an unconscious defense mechanism whereby the mind substitutes either a new aim or a new object for goals felt in their original form to be dangerous or unacceptable.
A term originating with Sigmund Freud, displacement operates in the mind unconsciously, its transference of emotions, ideas, or wishes being most often used to allay anxiety in the face of aggressive or sexual impulses. (Wikipedia)
Someone who witnesses this act; the dog being kicked, and points his finger at the pet owner, and claims he’s the offender, may become subject to in-direct, (“projected”), aggression, because the pet owner cannot face the fact he committed such a despicable act; he accuses the witness of the act he committed. There is no evidence to support this claim, but the pet owner believes the lie his unconscious mind created. This type of defence mechanism is called; “projection”, and commonly occurs when a person is attempting to "save face"; the unconscious mind, as a survival mechanism, wants to protect his reputation from being tarnished.
Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to other. For example, a person who is habitually intolerant may constantly accuse other people of being intolerant. It incorporates blame shifting. (Wikipedia)
Hollywood “wannabe actresses” who became celebrities are, without shame, projecting their displaced aggression on the person who helped them, due to them exploiting his known, well reported, “vulnerability”; Harvey Weinstein admits he has a “sex addiction”, and has sought treatment in the past for this problem; why is it only now, after decades of Mr. Weinstein supposedly “sexually abusing” women, are so many female “stars” making assertions to the media, (no evidence has been presented to police to support their claims), that they’ve been raped; sexually violated in numerous ways; by this man the media now portrays as a monster?
What the public is unaware of, although similar instances have occurred, is that there was probably a concern within Hollywood about names, and certain acts, becoming public; although therapy should be confidential; (private between client and therapist); somebody, somehow, may have obtained these records, (the suspicion may, or may not, be based on fact), which led a multitude of women making horrendous claims they're unable to substantiate. What is the motive behind their actions? It serves to uphold their unwarranted, unearned, reputation within Hollywood, and among the masses they love to be adored by.
How could such a scenario play out on the world stage, while no one been given a voice within the media to question how, and why, this character assassination has been allowed to transpire? The truth of the matter is that if the media permitted different sides to this story to be aired it would undermine the method it, (all forms of social media), uses to create a monster. A person becomes a monster by repeatedly doing things that are “bad”; obviously, in order for these “bad acts” to continue, (all criminal acts are a form of violent), they must go undetected; “governments”; the police, and the media, work in collusion to make this happen. Nobody has questioned in the media how these women, who are depicted as angelic creatures, can play roles in movies that damage minds by combining sex with violence, or why in the music industry a person such as Beyoncé, the sweet natured being she is, who sings vulgar lyrics; acts in vulgar videos, and married a gangster, is portrayed as a role model for women around the globe?
A monster can be created in the following manner; one studies documented monsters in history; Josef Stalin, and Adolf Hitler,for example, (they are the prototypesWAG THE DOG - Trailer - (1997) - HQ used by the media), and then make sure the masses are subjected to the same influences; stimuli, that made Stalin a monster; (the behaviour of rats, and pigeons, is modified in laboratories by psychologists in the same manner).
“His, (Josef Stalin), name became synonymous with Hitler as a merciless tyrant who had little concern for the value of human life.” (1)
John B. Watson; (Behavioural psychologist)
This is what happens when people don't earn, deserve, what they have; they cannot face the truth about themselves; they cannot undo what they're done; their unconscious mind uses defense mechanisms so as to enable them to function with a clear conscience; free of guilt, shame, and remorse.
“The Holocaust Encyclopaedia of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum provides a concise origin of the term “genocide”: In 1944, a Polish-Jewish lawyer named Raphael Lemkin (1900-1959) sought to describe Nazi policies of systematic murder, including the destruction of the European Jews. He formed the word “genocide… a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.” The next year, the International Military Tribunal held at Nuremberg, Germany, charged top Nazis with “crimes against humanity.” The word “genocide” was included in the indictment.” (2)
Stalin ignored the fact that he was compelling them to think he was great, and wallowed in the illusion of people’s admiration for him. (3)
“Joseph Stalin was born Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili in the republic of Georgia around the year 1879, the only surviving child of Vissarion and Yekaterina Dzhugashvili. At the time of his birth, Georgia was still a relatively new Russian annex, and discrepancies regarding the exact date and location of his birth are partially attributed to the on-going Georgia-Ossetian conflict. Grigory Zinoviev, later a prominent figure in Stalin’s political quests, accentuated his background in describing him as a “bloodthirsty Ossetian.” The significance of Stalin’s Georgian background manifests itself in numerous respects throughout his life.
Both Vissarion and Yekaterina were listed as serfs, and what limited information is available regarding Stalin’s childhood contends that it was of a common peasant’s lifestyle. What such a childhood entails violent outbursts following alcohol intoxication, generally from the father and aimed at both mother and child. Strained relationships between fathers and sons, husbands and wives, and consequently differing goals for children set up conflict within families.” (4)
Legal systems in “consumer societies” now grant such “power” to children that it is impossible for parents to discipline, and punish, their kids as they should. The best way to make a child rotten is to spoil him; it’s also a way to manufacture a person who doesn't want to work, yet feels entitled to have others work for him – a “consumer”.
“Josef suffered from a nearly fatal bout with smallpox at age 4 and thereafter had a severely pocked face, which was always retouched in photographs; blood poisoning at age 9 was brought on subsequently to being run over by a carriage, an accident which gave Stalin a permanently disfigured and much shorter left arm.” (5)
“To maintain his image, Stalin was always hailed as the greatest intellect and creative force in the Soviet Union, perhaps even of all time, and pro-Stalin propaganda became the norm. Beginnings of Psychopathology Underneath a firm fa?ade of power, Stalin found himself struggling with what he believed to be depression; feelings of inferiority, alleged threats to his feelings of grandeur along with various concerns led him to seek help.” (6)
When a person is given something he doesn’t deserve, he fashions a way to make himself believe he earned it; he rationalizes; justifies, and intellectualizes; in other words; he wallows in self-deception; at the same time he creates an “Inferiority Complex”, which can be portrayed, seen by others, as a “Superiority Complex”.
An inferiority complex is a lack of self-worth, a doubt and uncertainty about oneself, and feelings of not measuring up to standards. It is often subconscious, and is thought to drive afflicted individuals to overcompensate, resulting either in spectacular achievement or extremely asocial behavior. In modern literature, the preferred terminology is "lack of covert self-esteem". For many, it is developed through a combination of genetic personality characteristics and personal experiences. (Wikipedia)
Superiority complex is a psychological defense mechanism that compensates for an inferiority complex. The term was coined by Alfred Adler as part of his school of individual psychology. It was introduced in his series of books, including "Understanding Human Nature" and "Social Interest". (Wikipedia)
“Stalin was also incredibly driven to feel jealous of anybody who appeared better than he in any domain, especially those in which he considered himself eminent.” (7)
“A year prior to his death, Lenin wrote a covert “political testament” in which he disclosed his worried regarding Stalin:
Stalin is too rude, and this defect, though quite tolerable in our midst and in dealings among us Communists, becomes intolerable in a General Secretary. That is why I suggest that the comrades think about a way to remove Stalin from that post and appoint in his place another man who in all respects differs from Comrade Stalin in his superiority, that is, more tolerant, more loyal, more courteous and more considerate of the comrades, less capricious.” (8)
“Stalin recognized the fact that the people were loyal to Lenin and therefore, after Lenin’s death, aligned himself closely to him.” (9)
“Notwithstanding, Stalin’s rise to power did not satisfy his desire for more; rather, it unveiled jealous and paranoid characteristics.” (10)
Paranoia can be created due to an inability, (although the circumstance requires such), to figure out “the nature of things”. If I can “figure out” why something happened, I am, as a consequence, less inclined to feel fear because the “mystery been solved”. People who suffer from dementia are prone to experience paranoia because they don’t understand why things happen, and, therefore, can experience fear due to a conceived threat, though there may not be one. “Consumers” suffer from paranoia as well, although I call their form; “paranoid/delusional/idiocy”.
"Much of Stalin’s regime concentrated on appeasing his paranoia, compounded by excessive consumption of alcohol. This led him to act impulsively and dispose of anyone who did not fit his idea for a “greater Soviet Union”. He was responsible for the extermination of various social groups and political leaders of opposing parties; most of his appointed cabinet was “disposed of” within several years of their appointments.” (11)
“While failure to perceive one’s flaws is a common human trait; Stalin’s case was extreme due to his intolerance of anything short of perfection in himself. This caused him to control the information that others received regarding him and his regime, by means of intimidation and altering literature.” (12)
Power in the wrong hands cannot use it responsibly, (“consumers”, for example); that's why they’re so dangerous.
“Nikolai Bukharin, a former ally of Stalin who was later renounced as result of a disagreement concerning collectivization, furthered the concept of Stalin’s paranoid insecurity. He observed that Stalin was unhappy at not being able to convince everyone, including himself, that he was greater than everyone else was. The paranoia that Stalin experienced was not limited towards others, rather it included him; this is allegedly caused by his suspicion that he is not as great as he believes himself to be.” (13)
“Consumers” have a “God Complex”; God only knows why! I’m just joking; if you ask a “consumer”, invariably one discovers he has no idea why he thinks so highly of himself, and, although he cannot provide evidence to support his claim, he still thinks he's so great he should be compared to God, and because nothing can be compared to God, he’s actually claiming he is God.
“When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves.” Viktor E. Frankl, “Man's Search for Meaning”
(Quotes 1-13; Psychopathology of Joseph Stalin by Marina Stal)
Read the full story about how Satan took over the world, and captured so many souls in "SATAN'S CIRCUS", by Nigel Shindler
Volume I: "NAZI HOMELAND"; The Global Economy
Volume II: "THE EVIL WITHIN; The British Lottery Club"
Consumerism; Exploitation/Degradation
Volume III: "THE BRITISH LOTTERY CLUB; The Evil Within"
Another Day in Paradise; Propaganda and the Media