Final is Final: Understanding the Finality of Arbitral Awards and Its Implications

Introduction

Arbitration has increasingly become a preferred means of resolving disputes due to its efficiency, confidentiality, and finality. The finality of an arbitral award signifies the end of the dispute, ensuring that the parties are bound by the decision without prolonged litigation. However, this principle of finality, while upheld across many jurisdictions, is subject to certain nuances. Understanding these subtleties is crucial when drafting arbitration clauses and preparing for potential disputes.

What Does Finality Mean?

In essence, the finality of an arbitral award means that once the decision is rendered, it is binding on the parties and enforceable, with very limited grounds for appeal or challenge. This principle is enshrined in international conventions like the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) and national arbitration laws such as Kenya’s Arbitration Act. Finality ensures that disputes reach a definitive conclusion, which is a critical advantage over litigation.

Grounds for Challenging an Arbitral Award

While arbitral awards are generally final, parties can seek to set them aside under limited grounds, as provided under Section 35 of the Kenyan Arbitration Act. These grounds include:

• Incapacity: One party was under some form of incapacity.
• Invalidity of the Arbitration Agreement: The arbitration agreement was not valid.
• Lack of proper notice: A party was not properly notified of the arbitration process.
• Excess of Jurisdiction: The tribunal exceeded its mandate.
• Public Policy Violation: The award is contrary to Kenya’s public policy.
• Fraud or Corruption: The award was obtained through fraudulent or corrupt means.

It’s crucial to understand that these grounds are exhaustive, and no additional reasons can be invoked to challenge the finality of an arbitral award.

Time Limits for Challenging Arbitral Award

Kenya's Arbitration Act provides a strict three-month window for setting aside an award, starting from the date of receipt of the award which is equivalent to notification that the award is ready for collection. The courts in Kenya have consistently upheld this deadline, affirming the importance of finality.

What Should Parties Consider When Negotiating Arbitration Clauses?

Finality begins with the drafting of arbitration clauses. Parties should carefully consider:

1. Scope: Define which disputes can be arbitrated and which cannot.
2. Tribunal Qualifications: Ensure arbitrators have the necessary expertise for the matter at hand.
3. Governing Law: Specify the laws applicable to both the arbitration process and the underlying contract.
4. Procedural Rules: Opt for established institutional rules or agree on specific ad hoc procedures.
5. Enforceability: Confirm that the award will be enforceable across relevant jurisdictions.
6. Confidentiality: Ensure the arbitration process and outcome remain confidential.
7. Appeals on Points of Law: You may agree that the arbitral award can be subject to appeal to the High Court and the Court of Appeal on points of law.

Conclusion

The principle of finality is foundational in arbitration, and it ensures that parties can resolve disputes in a definitive and efficient manner. By understanding and carefully drafting arbitration clauses, parties can secure their interests while respecting the binding nature of arbitral awards, warts and all.

For insights Visit MMC Asafo? or

Contact Daniel Musyoka – [email protected]

Solomon Opole – [email protected]

Venic Kerubo – [email protected] for expert legal advice and support .