...IPCC_Fights_CO2_Warming ...Under_Solar_Cooling_Attack ?

...IPCC_Fights_CO2_Warming ...Under_Solar_Cooling_Attack ?

Choose your battle ?

No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image

  • IPCC says fossil energy CO2 is warming earth climate ... Or not ?
  • Half a million year long term climate historic cycles say we can just as well get another new glacial soon ... Or not ?
  • Four millennia climate historic cycles say we may just as well get a new cold cycle in the running of our interglacial ... Or not ?
  • Weakening solar cycles now also say that we may just as well get a new cold cycle in the running of our interglacial soon now ... Or not ?

IPCC is really right about CO2 global warming ?

Or climate cycles are preparing global cooling for us ?


Anyway :

No alt text provided for this image

PROFESSOR VALENTINA ZHARKOVA BREAKS HER SILENCE AND CONFIRMS “SUPER” GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM


No alt text provided for this image

In climate science there are too many unanswered questions and too many unquestioned answers ...

But :

Health & Climate & Energy are really very complicated and delicate politico-scientific stuff and also socio-economic stuff but we do the best we can and try to explain it as simple as possible but not simpler than that in the group :

CCR="Climate Change Revival

Bob Quartero

Senior Partner at Mountain Ash Collective

2 年

It would be helpful to explain the extremely condensed scale of the Vostok curves. The systematic lag between T and CO2 is hard to spot unless you zoom in. It is rather obvious at the cooling into the last ice age, where T drops independent of CO2; a gap that lasts for about 15,000 years. The other lags are merely around 1000 years and disappear on a condensed scale. T changes first, dramatically and quickly, CO2 responds later..up as well as down.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Joannes Sevenhans的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了