Fianna Fáil land the big spending Departments - opportunity and threat.

Fianna Fáil land the big spending Departments - opportunity and threat.

Only the leaders of the three Coalition parties know how Departments were divided between the parties. It’s clear that they started with a 6:6:3 ratio of Cabinet Ministers. 

Splitting Finance and Public Expenditure and Reform into separate Departments made total sense in the spirit of partnership between FF and FG.

What gets interesting, however, is how and why the remaining Departments were allocated between the parties. Using https://whereyourmoneygoes.gov.ie/en/2019/ (last updated in Feb 2019-so no Covid spending included), there is a pattern emerging.

In 2019 total Government expenditure net of debt servicing and EU payments and spending D/Taoiseach D/Finance and D/PER was €66 billion. 

The Departments now headed by Green Ministers (Transport, Communications and Children) spent around €5 billion.

The five line Departments now filled by Fine Gael Ministers (including the Tánaiste) spent €27 billion. But €21 billion of that (78%) came from the Social Protection Department- the remaining four Departments just spent €6 billion.

The four line Departments now filled by Fianna Fáil Ministers (Health, Housing, Education and Agriculture spent over €34 billion in 2019.

So, the pattern emerging is that (outside of Social Protection) Fianna Fáil now occupy the big spending public facing Departments of State.

This carries both an opportunity and a threat for Fianna Fail. The threat will come in the form remorseless attack from the opposition - especially Sinn Fein which goes into the 33rd Dáil with increased fire power. Other opposition parties like Labour and the Soc Dems will also target the Departments now occupied by Fianna Fail Ministers.

The opportunity comes if the new Ministers can deliver real improvements in each Department. It appears from the pattern identified above that Michael Martin looked for these portfolios to demonstrate that the party had the capacity to deliver. Perhaps Leo Varadkar agreed because he knew how difficult it would be? 

 

 

Brian Hunt

Director of Policy | Law Society of Ireland

4 年

Very interesting analysis Gerry.

回复
Jim O'Leary

Economist, Research Analyst

4 年

Not quite sure how you totted up Roderic O'Gorman's portfolio of Children, Youth Affairs, Disability, Equality and Integration or Catherine Martin's Arts, Culture, Media, Sport and Tourism (and Gaeltacht?), but I guess that your main point still stands: FF have the big spending departments. Crucially perhaps, they also have PER.

回复
Cian Doherty

Director at Drury Communications

4 年

Great analysis Gerry.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gerry Naughton的更多文章

  • Biden doesn't have to win the last debate. Just let Trump lose it.

    Biden doesn't have to win the last debate. Just let Trump lose it.

    The two presidential teams are sitting down this week trying figure out how to approach the campaign's last debate on…

  • Seven things I hope Joe Biden does

    Seven things I hope Joe Biden does

    The TD Joe Higgins once described debating with Bertie Ahern as like “playing handball against a haystack”. I was…

    18 条评论
  • Goodbye New Politics. Hello Old Politics.

    Goodbye New Politics. Hello Old Politics.

    At last, it’s July and we have a Government. After the longest consistory in the history of Irish politics, the Green…

    5 条评论
  • Communicating in and out of a pandemic

    Communicating in and out of a pandemic

    It is over three months since Ireland recorded our first Covid-19 case. The steps taken to close down our society and…

    6 条评论
  • Framework document - fact or fiction?

    Framework document - fact or fiction?

    The joint FF/FG Framework document has had a bad press. Respected commentators like Cliff Taylor and Dan O’Brien have…

    3 条评论
  • Political First Dates Ireland

    Political First Dates Ireland

    I've been asked to explain Government formation talks to a non political audience. Here goes.

    5 条评论
  • Sequencing of Brexit votes could have made a big difference

    Sequencing of Brexit votes could have made a big difference

    Watching the vote and the fall out in the House of Commons tonight, I can't help but wonder if Mrs May made a serious…

    6 条评论
  • Story telling is an underused weapon by our political leaders

    Story telling is an underused weapon by our political leaders

    In a recent debate organised by the Collins Institute, Dan O’Brien, economist and journalist, argued that centrists…

    11 条评论
  • Pundits -Sporting and Political!

    Pundits -Sporting and Political!

    With the World Cup in full swing and big matches coming thick and fact, we all get to see more and more of the expert…

    2 条评论
  • What the huge Yes vote might mean to politics

    What the huge Yes vote might mean to politics

    The scale of the Yes vote in the Eight Referendum has a number of implications for the wider political world. Timing of…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了