A few thoughts from Perugia

A few thoughts from Perugia

This year's International Journalism Festival was EPIC and full of needle-shifting, narrative-bending conversations.


I loved our panel with Evan Smith and Mary Walter-Brown about live events and their role in our attention-deprived world. The Texas Tribune Festival and Coda Media, Inc's ZEG Tbilisi Storytelling Festival ?as well as the International Journalism Festival itself are all increasingly important platforms of journalism that publishers can actually control. It was also great to dive into the challenges of AI in the newsroom with Akoto Ofori-Atta , Carolina Guerrero and Dawn Garcia of John S. Knight Journalism Fellowships at Stanford. And it was an absolute treat to be on stage with this extraordinary, inspirational group of my all time favorite people: Prof. Julie Posetti, Patricia Campos Mello, Branko Brkic and Maria Ressa.

But for me, one of the highlights of Perugia was the conversation that began at this panel hosted by Jesper Doub and Madhav Chinnappa (ex Facebook and ex Google) who gathered a crowd of people for their talk on what went wrong between the platforms and the news industry. I was looking forward to seeing them both reflect on their time at Facebook and Google. My expectation was that of reflection and reckoning. And so, I was disappointed when we got instead what felt like same messaging we've all heard from the platforms before. I won't paraphrase it, but you can see the full session here.

And so I asked a question that went something like this: "Lets zoom out so that we can see the elephant in the room: while you were serving Prosecco to journalists in Perugia (reference to the enormous amount of money tech companies spent on the news industry. To be fair, only tiny amount of it went to prosecco), the companies you worked for were enabling authoritarian regimes that undermine the very structure of the society that enables journalism. What are your reflections on that"?

This question kicked off a conversation that continued through the rest of my time in Perugia, beyond the venue, in the bars and in the streets. I was surprised by the number of people who came up to me and thanked me for saying what they were thinking. I am also grateful to Madhav Chinnappa for continuing to engage on the subject well into the night.

Great as it is to have these conversations in a bar, it is essential to have them publicly. The Big Tech owners are emerging as the most powerful players on the global stage, and journalism is failing at holding them to account.

From the United States to Europe, from Africa to Asia, authoritarian populists are on the rise, elections are undermined, journalists are being silenced and space for free expression is shrinking because the Big Tech has created a world in which only the loudest, nastiest voices can win. It's a successful business model but it's detrimental to democracy.

I was asked to give examples. Here are a few:

I can go on and there is so much more on codastory.com but the point is that one of the root causes of the world's problems is that today the biggest tech companies have more money and power than most governments. And they've captured so much of the media industry that's supposed to be reporting on them.

Over the years, and in part because so many fabulous ex colleagues like Madhav or Jesper went to work for the tech companies (no judgement!), journalism industry developed a weird relationship with the Big tech. It's time we stop pretending that we play on the same team. Scale, speed and attention grabbing that the new internet is build on could not be further away from the values of journalism as an institution of liberal democracy. AI is about to make it all worse.

If we, journalists, want to survive, we need to do better at holding power to account and no one is more powerful (and has made themselves more inaccessible) than the billionaires running Big Tech companies of today.

And so many thanks to Christopher Potter and his incredible International Journalism Festival team for providing us with an independent platform where this vital conversation can live in a way that's impactful, thought-provoking and, hopefully, leads to change.

Perfect example of why live events are the future of journalism!




Willem Lenders

Programmamanager bij Limelight Foundation

10 个月

Happy to hear you've addressed this in the room. As a funder in both spaces (tech accountability and journalism), we regularly run into the naivety towards tech platforms at media, journalism or press freedom organizations. And at times we see those working on tech accountability unaware of the needs of media/journalists. We regularly see those advocating for press freedom advocating the opposite of those advocating tech accountability, because they operate in silos. Articles that were left out of the DSA after successful advocacy popping up in the media freedom act, GDPR being used as a tool for SLAPPs, etc. This work needs to be bridged.

回复
Prof. Julie Posetti

Global Director of Research, International Center For Journalists (ICFJ) & Professor of Journalism at City, University of London. International Fund for Public Interest Media (IFPIM) board member.

11 个月

Brilliant summary of the best Perugia I’ve been to in a decade (flu notwithstanding!).

回复
Florence Martin-Kessler

Founder and CEO, Live Magazine

11 个月

??… perfect exemple of why live events are the future of journalisme?? ! Mais oui ! Exactement. Also, as you know. I drank the prosecco. Tbilissi here we come ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Natalia Antelava的更多文章

  • Escaping China with a spoon and a rusty nail

    Escaping China with a spoon and a rusty nail

    In 2021, Peter Pomerantsev wrote a remarkable essay for Coda describing what the former British foreign minister David…

    2 条评论
  • The Game of Strategic Contradictions

    The Game of Strategic Contradictions

    Land grabs, power grabs, resource grabs. What blows my mind watching this week's developments unfold is something…

  • Why Noise Won. The Day After Tomorrow - Issue #1

    Why Noise Won. The Day After Tomorrow - Issue #1

    It is 2014. I'm standing at immigration in Sana'a, Yemen.

    12 条评论
  • The Anatomy Of Treason

    The Anatomy Of Treason

    Dear Reader, I've been thinking a lot about treason lately. Last week, a friend of mine back home in Georgia was…

    6 条评论
  • STOP DRINKING FROM THE TOILET

    STOP DRINKING FROM THE TOILET

    “The simplest way to combat misinformation is with the truth,” wrote Taylor Swift in her instagram post endorsing…

  • 2024: The year of punching through the noise

    2024: The year of punching through the noise

    I originally wrote this letter for Coda Media, Inc's subscribers. Join our mailing list now! Hello from Palo Alto, For…

    1 条评论
  • United against ‘Sodom’: Uganda's anti-gay law is a win for Russia

    United against ‘Sodom’: Uganda's anti-gay law is a win for Russia

    Friends of the Kremlin have something to celebrate this week. The “good” news is that “progressive” (their headline…

  • UKRAINE, THE END OF THE BEGINNING

    UKRAINE, THE END OF THE BEGINNING

    Disinfo Matters is Coda Story's weekly newsletter that looks beyond fake news to examine how manipulation of…

  • DISINFO MATTERS: THE CURIOUS CASE OF SEYMOUR HERSH

    DISINFO MATTERS: THE CURIOUS CASE OF SEYMOUR HERSH

    14 FEBRUARY, 2023 Sign up here to get the next edition of Coda Story's Disinfo Matters, straight to your inbox. Did the…

    1 条评论
  • Re-inventing Crisis Reporting

    Re-inventing Crisis Reporting

    Have you noticed how quickly big news stories die? How rapidly they disappear from our screens? We are saturated with…

    5 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了