Federated Learning: Types, Techniques, and Challenges

As artificial intelligence rapidly transforms industries and societies, concerns over data privacy and security have understandably grown. People want the benefits of advanced AI applications but remain rightfully wary of surrendering control over their personal information. At the same time, training high-quality machine learning models requires vast amounts of representative data – a challenge for any single entity.

Federated Learning presents an elegant solution. It allows organizations and individuals to train machine learning models through collaboration without exposing private local data. This technique opens new possibilities for developing powerful AI while respecting individual privacy and regulatory compliance.

In this article, we will explore the workings of Federated Learning, its advantages over traditional centralized approaches, and real-world applications across healthcare, smart cities, and more. By understanding this technology, you will gain insight into how its decentralized approach safeguards data security without hindering progress.

Let's start with the basics of what makes Federated Learning so unique.

What is Federated Learning?

Traditional machine learning training involves sending raw user data to a central location for model development. This presents several issues. Besides privacy concerns, it creates potential single points of failure and raises regulatory challenges surrounding data localization.

Federated Learning flips this paradigm. Instead of aggregating data in a single location, the learning process occurs where the data is already located – on individual client devices like phones, tablets and IoT sensors. The core steps are:

• A baseline machine learning model is sent from the server to participating edge devices.
• Each device trains the model using its own local data without exchanging private information.
• The device then sends only the model updates, not the underlying data, back to the central server for aggregation.
• The server combines these changes to improve the global model and shares the update with all participating devices.
• Steps 2-4 repeat as the model progressively refines based on contributions from all decentralized sources.

In this way, devices collaborate to train an AI model without any individual needing to share data. The insights gleaned from private local datasets collectively enhance the performance of the coordinated model.

Types of Federated Learning

There are two main types of Federated Learning based on how devices interact during the training process:

• Horizontal Federated LearningIn horizontal federated learning (HFL), each client or device contains a diverse set of data instances that include features or variables in common with other clients. For example, if the goal was to analyze patient medical records to improve diagnosis, different hospitals may hold data on different patients, but all patients would have their basic details, symptoms, test results, etc. recorded and available for analysis. During the training process in HFL, each client works on modeling the relationship between the features for their own data instances without sharing or transmitting the actual individual records. Only the changes or updates to the distributed model are shared between the clients and the central server after each training iteration. This ensures that sensitive patient records remain private on individual devices while allowing for collaborative training of a unified model. The clients in HFL communicate with each other or a central coordinating server to agree on a common analytical model using their localized datasets. As the federated averaging algorithm aggregates client parameter updates, it arrives at a centralized model that captures patterns and relationships in the pooled data while keeping all individual records local. This trains highly accurate global models without compromising on privacy.

Read the blog here