To be Feared or Loved as a Manager?
Michael Iacona
Senior Director - Software & Technology - Private Equity Services at Alvarez & Marsal
“Upon this a question arises; whether it is better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? One should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved.” – Niccolo Machiavelli
In Machiavelli’s famous book The Prince, he explored the topic of being loved or being feared in the context of politicians and rulers of nations. Machiavelli concluded if only given one choice, it was better to be feared. He also offered some simple piece of advice: you can’t control other people’s emotions or behavior, you can only control your own, so base your administration on what you can control.
First-Time Managers Fall into a Trap
In my experience, when new managers take the reins, they generally lean into leading one of two ways: By Love or Fear.
Is one better than the other? Or should you take another approach entirely?
Let’s explore.
The “Being Loved” Approach
Most new managers try to build consensus and develop friendly relationships with their employees because they believe that being loved by their team will yield loyalty and bring with it great results. These managers ask questions, start conversations, proactively solicit feedback and ideas for improvement. And while all positive traits in their own right, if done simply to gain admiration, the manager will ultimately be in a tough position as it relates to making decisions that go against the team’s opinions.
Other managers simply become too chummy with their staff and are often afraid to pull rank for fear they’ll fall out of grace with their team and damage camaraderie if they’re too tough. "So many leaders, supervisors, and bosses suffer from a nice-guy conflict," says Bruce Tulgand, author of It's Okay to Be the Boss: The Step-by-Step Guide to Becoming the Manager Your Employees Need. "Managers are afraid that people will think they’re a jerk."
Leading with Fear
Managers who choose to lead with fear, hope to scare their staff into submission and get them to do things without asking questions. These folks are the classic do-as-I-say-or-else kinds of bosses. They “inspire” their teams to act simply because those employees feel as though they are always one slip-up away from being fired.
No doubt, fear will get people to do things! But I’m of the belief that employees won’t reach their full potential, or go above and beyond if they are in environments that consists mostly of fear. They’ll worry so much about messing up that they won’t demonstrate the emotional fortitude to come forth with new ideas or invest in their professional development.
If leading by fear is your game, then perhaps you’re in the wrong industry ;)
Enter The Respected Leader
There is a third option – a kind of leader that lies between the Feared Leader and the Loved Leader – I call it the Respected Leader.
The Respected Leader:
- Leads by example
- Commands admiration by setting clear direction along with high standards and expectations
- Has no tolerance for team members who undermine others, can’t play along with team members, or refuses to help meet goals and objectives
- Cares for team members by understanding that humans mess up from time to time; uses those times as learning opportunities
- Is humbled and doesn’t take themselves too seriously
- Takes the time to listen, but acts decisively when making decisions and handling troubled employee matters
The Respected leader is one who gets their team to accomplish great things with a combination of admiration and high expectations; with the goal of constant productivity and organizational improvement.
No Matter What, It Will Always Be Challenging
When you’re a manager and leader, hard decisions and challenges come with the territory. But when your team truly respects you, support follows, making your job somewhat easier and quit frankly more enjoyable.
Like many things in life, it's usually never a zero-sum game. You really don't need to choose between leading by love or fear. Know the pros and cons for each as touched upon in this article, and develop your own style of leadership. In the end, your success will be dependent on your ability to get others to accomplish great things.
Interdisciplinary Consulting Engineer
8 年Respect is best. Fear rarely works, for long (But Matthew Shorr is correct, some people are just slackers or trouble makers and if you can't just fire them the only thing to do is lean on them till they fear you - otherwise the whole team is demoralized). Being loved is okay but often means your not making rough business decisions, and may not be pushing people to grow.
Principal/Proprietor | Technical Agile PMP & SCM Program Executive who advises, leads, and manages Transformations, AI, Analytics, DevOps & Cloud | Former MSFT & IBM | Top Secret/SCI CLR (Contract: Remote Only)
8 年Nice Post Spencer - I hope all is well
HR Manager - Mutual Redevelopment Houses Inc.
8 年Part of this is situational - differnt egroups of employees need differnet appraoches - and part of it depends on the manager's personality. Mary Bugglin is correct that respect is the key.
Retired Firm Administrator
8 年I find the most effective management tool is to earn respect from those you work with. You need to have the skill set to manage up the organization as well as down the organization. Treat others as you would want to be treated.
Director, Technology Operations & Security at The Golden Touch Group
8 年Michael, I think all three are required to manage all types of employees. Some people simply do not love or respect, and fear is the only thing that motivates them. Not in that you need to employ fear tactics, but that people must at least have a basic grasp that failure to meet requirements will result in consequences. Love and respect may cover 70% of staff, 30% may need that healthy dose of fear. We are all different with different motivation.