FCA Watchlist, strengths & weaknesses (22/98)
Gavin Stewart
Writer, Commentator on financial regulation; Former regulator; Ex-international rower & Sports Administrator.
This is the latest in the series of daily blogs on financial regulation that I began posting on my first day of Covid wfh, 16 March 2020. I hope you enjoy and find useful...
News that the FT has seen an FCA letter informing a firm it had been put on the regulator's Watchlist reminds me of some of the value the Watchlist adds but also of the burdens and vagaries come with it.
Its birth dates back to the failure of Independent Insurance in 2001. One of the FSA's responses was to develop a better watchlist system that would quickly escalate firms with major regulatory issues to the top of the organisation. Importantly, it came with subsidiary department and divisional watchlists, so inevitably a cottage industry quickly developed. I'm sure this still exists, creating pluses and minuses for the regulator and for the supervisors involved.
The obvious advantage of the Watchlist system, a big one, is the level of scrutiny it creates around firms posing significant risks. This reduces the danger of supervisors underestimating problems and/or having too much confidence in the measures they have put in place to fix them.
The Watchlist also provide an important means of comparing, and potentially prioritising, different types of problems, different sized firms from different sectors. Inevitably, some of the scrutiny is subjective but, at its best, the range of experience and expertise in the room produces high quality discussions that provide a vital addition to how the regulator deals with its highest risk firms.
But the watchlist mechanism also creates some risks of its own that need to be guarded against. To take one example, the initial decision to put a firm on the department watchlist typically sits with the Supervision Manager or Head of Dept, and if they get that judgement wrong the firm in question will get less scrutiny that it would in a non-watchlist world. Northern Rock is an instance of this.
领英推荐
Another potential weakness is the resources required to report to the various scrutiny panels and committees. This can be a considerable burden and, for other than the biggest firms, Supervision teams will be stretched thinly. And, especially for cases with a public profile, this can become worse through an excess of enthusiasm from senior managers asking for additional information.
A core element of Supervision, the Watchlist has always been a challenge to operate successfully. Getting it right will be critical in helping regulators perform effectively through the current cost-of-living crisis.
I also publish a?weekly regulatory update. If you found this interesting,?sign up?to receive it direct into your inbox each week.
Don’t forget our monthly financial services regulatory update webinar is now a podcast!?Subscribe and listen to the podcast now?where David Morrey and I dissect what’s really happening in the world of regulation. I also host ongoing episodes with Irina Velkova on the latest developments with industry experts.
The UK regulatory handbook 2022 is an indispensable guide to the regulatory landscape for financial services. You can now download the handbook for 2022?here.
Building Society Chief Risk Officer
2 年Interesting comments - thanks for sharing. Do you think a firm knowing they are on a watchlist affects their behaviour? And is this a good thing or not?