The Far-Reaching Implications of New Capital Requirements for US Banks

The Far-Reaching Implications of New Capital Requirements for US Banks

US regulators have announced sweeping changes to capital requirements for banks with more than $100 billion in assets following upheavals at Silicon Valley Bank and elsewhere. ?

The proposed changes include: ?

  • Ensuring consistency in the approach to calculating risk-based capital requirements for large banks.?????
  • Incorporating unrealized losses or gains associated with available-for-sale securities in capital calculations and total loss-absorbing capacity. ????
  • Adjusting the approach to the surcharge for Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) to make it more granular and sensitive.?

There are separate proposals in the works relating to total loss-absorbing capacity requirements and stress testing. ?

The So What ?

Assuming the proposed changes are ratified, banks will have until July 2028 to comply. Nevertheless, they should begin preparing for the changes immediately, advises BCG Managing Director and Partner Bashir Todai .

“The proposed changes will have significant implications on the profitability of the US banking sector – especially for regional banks,” - Bashir Todai ?

The measures signal a tougher regime ahead, according to Todai. This means:

  • Many banks will have to increase their capital ratios. The Federal Reserve estimates that there will be a 16% increase in aggregate capital requirements across the banking system.?????
  • In addition, recent commentary by the Fed suggests that banks will need to further increase their total loss-absorbing capacity, leading to increased funding costs.?????????
  • New rules requiring recognition of unrealized losses of available-for-sale securities will temper risk-taking and dent returns in investment portfolios.
  • Risk management capabilities will need to be upgraded, especially for regional banks, causing staffing levels and costs to rise. ?
  • Banks will have to ensure their risk data is comprehensive and accurate. Small data issues threaten to meaningfully impact capital, given the greater reliance on standardized capital approaches. ??
  • These forces will create material headwinds to profitability for many banks. Further consolidation among regional lenders seems likely. ?

Now What ?

There is a comment period through November 30, 2023. If approved, the proposed changes will be phased in between July 2025 and July 2028.?

However, supervisory and market expectations are already shifting. Banks can take the following steps to prepare for the changes: ???

  • Banks that rapidly grew their business portfolios over the last few years during an era of easy deposits and cheap funding will have to consider retreating to a core of more profitable activities.? ?
  • Banks should enhance capabilities around risk data, stress testing, interest rate risk management, and regulatory affairs in anticipation of increased scrutiny. ?
  • Banks need to examine a range of measures to improve productivity, including organizational efficiency, procurement and third-party spend. They should also work to boost revenue through pricing, customer acquisition, and retention. ?
  • Banks should prime themselves for industry consolidation and evaluate potential targets against overall strategic objectives, as well as ensuring integration readiness.???

Find out more about BCG’s financial services consulting teams.

shahiN Noursalehi

Blue Skies Researcher

1 年

just read the article and get disappointed not to see any of suggestions around the importance of #research and #innovation for achieving a sustainable banking system. and the #digital_transformation was the greatest absent in the content. IMHO, the way that economy is going to work is not fully understood yet by strategic managers in the banking system, but fintechs do.

回复
Timothy Ayodele

Impact Finance | Management Consulting | Enhancing Capabilities and Opportunities for Individuals | Advocates for SDG 4, 8, 17

1 年

Curious to see the effects of these changes (if approved) play out in the coming years, such as mergers and acquisitions of regional banks, as stated in the article.

回复
John D. Possumato

Retail Strategy @ Hyundai. Automotive/Mobility industry Expert. HEC Paris MBA. Ex-Uber, Ex-Consulting. Entrepreneurial mindset and innovation applied to Automotive Retail.

1 年

This is good news, but I’m skeptical. American banks (despite being some of the loudest on the world stage) are by far the most risky and least efficiently managed in terms of capital requirements and many have not put much emphasis on passing their stress tests since the last crisis. I don’t think this will abate any future bank failures at all, as the US seems to excel on a world stage with these.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了