Fancy a Fun Fact?

Ever feel like science news is a whirlwind?

In today's world of endless online information, figuring out what is real and what is just hype can be a bit tricky. So, having a list of quick tips on how to write an article that is factually right can come handy.

In our previous newsletter (Missed it? Go back and read it!), we have already discussed on tips and tricks for good factchecking in science writing. This time, we discuss the Do's and Don'ts of?factchecking while creating content. Join us as we give you the checklist on how to be a smart writer.

This newsletter is your compass, guiding you on how to? fact check science fact-checking. Whether you are a leader in the Lifesciences, Biotech, Healthcare, Pharma, Environment, or Sustainability industries, a researcher, content writer, creator or communicator in science or even a healthcare professional, this resource empowers you to navigate the ever-evolving realm of scientific news.

Let's find out what we have in store for you!

Do's:

Identify the facts and assumptions:

• Do not rely on a single source. Open multiple tabs on your web browser to look for supporting evidence from other reputable sources before accepting a claim as true. Read as many credible resources as you can to know the truth.
• Pay close attention to the underlying assumptions that shape the narrative. Also, be wary of absolute statements (always, exactly) and sensationalized language. This will help you spot bias, evaluate evidence, and understand the bigger picture.

For example, fact checking tips gave us a complete picture on the recent AstraZeneca news.

The AstraZeneca?COVID-19 vaccine, known as Covishield in India, has been surrounded by controversy due to a rare side effect called Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS). This condition involves blood clots forming in unusual places along with a low platelet count, which is important for clotting.

AstraZeneca acknowledged a connection between their vaccine and TTS in legal documents. This suggests the vaccine can potentially cause TTS in very rare cases. This news caused concern, particularly in India where Covishield was widely used. Unfortunately, some social media posts exaggerated the risk, leading to undue panic.

It is important to remember that experienced health experts have clarified the risk of TTS is extremely rare. The benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 far outweigh the very low risk of TTS. Vaccination remains the most effective way to prevent serious COVID-19 illness.

This is a clear example of irresponsible fact checking induced reactionary panic in the general public. Let's have a look at some more tips on how?to fact check science news better.

Rest assured that we take our own advice seriously - any content from SciRio also goes through this process rigorously and so you can expect good quality, scientifically accurate content.

Utilize quality sources:

• Prioritize primary resources like research papers and peer-reviewed publications. Avoid referring to predatory journals. Utilize online academic databases like PubMed or Google Scholar to access peer-reviewed research articles on specific topics. These articles undergo rigorous review by other scientists, ensuring the quality and accuracy of the information.
• Talk to experienced professionals from established science publications or organizations to verify the claim.
• Avoid press releases or websites with a clear agenda or questionable credibility.
• Verify statistics and numbers used in the information you are examining.

Consider context and evidence:

• Examine how strong the study's evidence is. Are the methods sound? Is the sample size sufficient?
• See how the study fits in with existing knowledge. Does it contradict, support, or refine current understanding? If reporting on one study, explain how it contributes to what we already know, not present it as definitive truth.
• Be honest if a claim cannot be confirmed. Acknowledge limitations of studies or your own understanding.

Refer to credible sources:

Keep yourself updated on retracted scientific papers using?Retraction Watch. This helps you avoid basing your understanding on debunked research.

Explore websites of relevant scientific societies for their official statements and publications on specific topics. These organizations aim to provide accurate and current information within their field.

You can follow Snopes.com?to investigate and debunk urban legends, folklore, myths, and misinformation. While not strictly science-focused, it can be helpful for identifying broader cultural narratives that might influence scientific claims.

Another similar website to Snopes is Leadstories.com. This platform?offers free fact-checking on a wide range of topics, including science-related ones.

• Climate Feedback?is also a global network of scientists who evaluate the accuracy of climate change information presented in media coverage.

Critical thinking techniques:

• Be aware of common logical fallacies used to manipulate information. Websites like Your Logical Fallacy Is offer resources to help you identify these.
• Follow major news outlets that focus on scientific claims. Look for sections like SciCheck by FactCheck.org or The Washington Post Fact Checker for science-specific analysis.
• Consider browser extensions to identify potential misinformation sources and offer fact-checking suggestions directly within your web browser. Some commonly used extensions are Media Bias/Fact Check, InVid, FakerFact, TrustServista, Stopaganda Plus, Check, TrustedNews, The Factual, Logically, CaptainFact, NewsGuard, Newstrition by Our.News, Hoaxly etc.
• Explore websites like Science News or EurekAlert! that curates breaking scientific research and discoveries from reputable sources. These can be starting points to find original research articles.
• Some social media platforms are implementing fact-checking features that flag potentially misleading content. While not foolproof, these can be helpful prompts for further investigation.

Bonus Do's:

• Learn how to read scientific studies. This will help you understand the research methodology and limitations.
• Keep yourself informed about new discoveries and changing paradigms.

Don'ts:

Accept ‘proof’ easily:

• Avoid language like ‘proves’ when describing research. Recognize that science is an ongoing process with evolving understandings.

Focus on personal opinions:

• Do not waste time verifying opinions, anecdotes, or personal experiences. Focus only on factual claims and verifiable data.

Overlook ambiguity:

• Science isn't always black-and-white. So, be comfortable with ‘may’ and ‘could’ when discussing ongoing research. Remember, lack of proof does not always mean something is false.

Trust blindly:

• Just because something is published or online does not mean it is true. Evaluate the source and its credibility before accepting the information. Also, be aware of potential biases and agendas influencing the information.

Spread misinformation:

• Do not share information you have not verified. Take the time to fact-check before hitting ‘share’.

Get discouraged:

• Fact-checking can be challenging. Persevere and seek help from trusted resources when needed. Remember, accurate science communication is crucial for informed decisions and public trust.

For example: Following these steps would have helped identify the red flags in Patanjali's case.

The Supreme Court of India took notice and criticized Patanjali after the Indian Medical Association (IMA) objected to a Patanjali ad campaign titled ‘Misconceptions Spread by Allopathy,’ which made claims that their products could cure various diseases.

The court highlighted the lack of scientific evidence to support the idea that Patanjali's products offered complete cures. They even issued a warning, threatening hefty fines if Patanjali continued with such misleading advertising in the future. While Patanjali assured the court they would comply, the issue remains complex.

Here is a closer look at the situation:

The core issue revolved around Patanjali's advertising campaign. The advertisements made claims that their products could completely cure diseases like diabetes and high blood pressure. These claims, however, lacked scientific backing.

It is important to acknowledge the potential benefits of Ayurveda for health and wellness. However, it is crucial to have realistic expectations. Ayurveda is not a guaranteed cure for chronic illnesses.

Regardless of whether you choose allopathic or Ayurvedic treatment, consulting a qualified doctor is essential for any medical condition.?Do not get clickbaited by confusing science headlines! Join thousands of science enthusiasts who fact-check science news like pros!

Share this newsletter with someone you think who really needs to fact-check before they share that news across their network.?

Stay tuned for more science communication hacks coming your way!

We leave you this week with a step-by-step guide on the fact checking process in science journalism - from the Data?Journalism website. Click on the picture below to read more!

At SciRio, we have always aspired for our services to fill the gaps between scicomm, science, and our societies. Our workshops and services often include diversifying efforts in scicomm beyond the traditional written word. As we move into a new phase for our enterprise, we also aim to expand our client base to new voices.

We offer credible content communication services for companies in the biosciences sectors like MedTech, Healthcare, and Pharma. Let us know if you are interested to work with us on these lines, or if you know anyone who needs such services!

Subscribe to our mailing list where we discuss SciComm themes and share resources to upskill yourselves.

For more updates, follow us on Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

If you have any feedback for us, feel free to get in touch with us at [email protected].