The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation
NATO Strategic Direction-South Hub
![NATO Strategic Direction-South Hub]()
NATO Strategic Direction-South Hub
'...development of peaceful and friendly relations… promoting conditions of stability and well-being' Art.2 NATO Chart
Since the release of ChatGPT3.5 roughly a year and a half ago, the promises and perils of artificial intelligence (AI) have captured the world’s attention. We are currently in the midst of a vigorous debate about which AI harms to focus on—those occurring now or more speculative harms that might happen in the future. Read here
NATO Southern Hub's weekly selection of news, events & publications pertaining to Security. Publications stem?from open sources, press agencies and?academia. They do not reflect the views of the?Hub?or any other NATO agency.
Founder || Economist || Researcher ||
10 个月Very insightful. The uncertainty about what to regulate when is equally linked to capacity and there is no guarantee that governments have the tools to regulate company activities as they usually lag in digitalization and tech readiness in developing countries. Voluntary disclosures will be more effective as models can be trained without digital trails "Very Easily". My biggest worry is that we discount the wage and labor market effects of AI. New jobs will be created yes, but they'll require skill and a uniquely tailored education. Thank you, authors!