Failure to Boost Female Founders
Anne-Marie Elias
Co Founder PrimeLife Partners ??Building Australia's longevity economy ecosystem to transform the way we age, live, care and retire | 2x Tedx speaker
The axing of the Boosting Female Founders program this year has left a vacuum in dedicated federal funding for women.?
Let that sink in!?
As a long time senior policy adviser, advocate and mentor to many diverse female founders, I know the Government has missed something critical - how are we going to boost female founders, who receive only 11% of all venture funding (just 7% to 100% female founded business), while delivering more returns than male led companies. In fact, research repeatedly confirms that women-led startups perform better and investors earn a 35% higher return on investment (“Why Women Owned Startups are a Better Bet”, Boston Consulting Group, 2018).?
When markets fail and there is a pressing need, the government is meant to step in.
There is a precedent. Launched in 2020 by the previous government, as part of the Women’s Economic Security Statements (2018 and 2020), Boosting Female Founders Initiative ?program’s aim “was to support more women into work by providing grants on a co-contribution basis to female owned and led startups to scale into domestic or global markets.”
The change of government at the federal level in 2022 and in NSW in 2023, saw? a pause of funding and a review of several matched funding programs by the Australian and NSW governments.?
These decisions stymied startups in NSW who were left with no access to matched funding for 12 months.?
In 2023, Investment Principal at AfterWork Ventures, Jessy Wu, raised the alarm in her LinkedIn post, detailing several programs on hold, including:
While it wasn’t perfect, the Boosting Female Founders program did fund 123 female led businesses from 2020 to 2024, who received matched funding up to $400,000.?
Many of these women were not able to get a loan from a financial institution or an investor.?
Women working on immensely important solutions like Lee Yearsly’s Skin or Mikaelia Jade’s Indigital were able to expand their business, employ more people and work on meaningful solutions.
This year's announcement was equally stellar as reported in Women's Agenda Meet the 34 grant recipients sharing in the $11.6 million Boosting Female Founders Initiative which supported Sarah Qian to compete in a male dominated manufacturing industry in Australia with Compassion Creamery.?
How will these women with extraordinary ideas be supported to scale in the future if there are fewer opportunities for women who deliver outsized results??
We are undeserving our country when there are fewer opportunities for diverse founders to contribute to solving meaning problems.?
领英推荐
There are surprisingly a number of initiatives that are led by women for women including zero and low interest loans and mentorship like? Coralus (formerly SheEO) and Women Owned Enterprise Loan Fund (WOELF) programs like Global Sisters and Tech Ready Women.?
Angel investor networks like Scale Investors and Scalare and migrant and refugee incubators and accelerators like Catalysr and Ignite.?
All these initiatives are filling important gaps in mentoring, networking and funding opportunities for underserved founders.?
The fact remains that while the community is investing in the gaps, there is an important role for all levels of government to help Australian businesses.?
The best thing the government could do is to open up their procurement to support Australian business. They can also talk to each other - at the various levels and across agencies. The late Paul Shetler said this a decade ago and it is still the only way we can get Australian business to thrive. Think about it!?
Imagine getting a fair slice of the $70 billion annual Australian government procurement budget, or the $40billion a year NSW procurement budget!?
And yes there are targets to increase the expenditure on Australian SMEs but not really startups. Imagine local government working with local business and entrepreneurs to better support local communities,?
In my view local and state and territory governments should focus on supporting startups with grants and opportunities to test ideas and procurement.?
The federal government can leverage budgets across agencies and support scale into domestic and global markets.?
Better still governments can procure on the basis of solving pain points like:
Until this happens we need to keep going and share the opportunities as they arise through the growing network of women and allies who are genuinely creating a more equitable funding landscape.?
A focus on seeking greater allocation of procurement to Australian startups and business will go a long way validating and scaling Australian products.??
The good part is that we are galvanising and showing up to support women outside the government.?
Anne-Marie Elias is a former senior policy adviser, mentor and UTS Fellow in Innovation and Entrepreneurship. She is the co founder of PrimeLife Partners.
Embarking on a transformative journey to reinvent and elevate my professional self – embracing growth, learning, and new opportunities.
2 个月On one hand, government officials and studies highlight the success and potential of women-led startups, yet on the other hand, female founders often face significant barriers when it comes to securing funding and receiving the full support they need from investors and industry leaders. Despite the evidence showing that female-led companies deliver higher returns, these biases and systemic challenges still persist, creating a gap between advocacy and action in the global business arena.
Anne-Marie Elias Rather than axing the program why not do a decent lessons learned - keep investing, look at some of the great ideas proposed as a response to this post and just do it better- maybe as Catherine Ball suggests also get support from our wealthiest.. Start-ups are hardened take time. If Australia is serious about productivity we need to keep innovating, taking intelligent risks and building new capabilities. . While we can't expect the government to fund everything, their support and understanding means a lot.
Straight-talking problem solver for complex problems | Find the value in your ESG | Leverage your data, technology and innovation | It's all connected #smartsolutions #futureproof #innovation
3 个月Well said Anne-Marie Elias
Liberal Party MP, NSW Parliament
3 个月Lisa Fedorenko!
Book coach and adviser to business leaders. Self publishing expert. Author. Increase your impact, recognition and visibility. Write, publish and successfully sell your business book. I can show you how. Ask me now.
3 个月Anne-Marie Elias The axing of this program and the way it was done was as ham-fisted as the way it was rolled out and administered, and then botched. This said, I don't agree that 'the government' must always step in. It's up to the PE, VC, family office, startup, scaleup ecosystem to get off their collective butts and do something about this. There are enough smart women across all of these sub groups. They should get together and make change and bring in some of the men as well to propel this. I'm not in this space but can name several men and women who could (and some already do lead women-focused support and $.