Failing to plan, is just planning to fail.
Daniel Stanton
CEO @ Mr. Supply Chain | Supply Chain and Project Management | 2.5+ Million Online Learners 丹尼尔·斯坦顿
Leaders need to clearly define the goals for a project, and then ensure that their team investigates the options. But there comes a point for every project when you need to start making decisions about what you will and won't do. I call this "Resolving to a course of action." And one of the best ways to get this done is by having your team create an integrated project plan - one that links all of their efforts together.
"Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes; but no plans.” Peter F. Drucker
No doubt, many of the ideas that your team has come up with are really good. But some of their ideas might not make sense given the constraints of your scope, schedule, and budget. You can't afford to ignore this challenge. In order for your project to be successful, you need to get all of your team's ideas on the table, make some decisions, and then get everyone rowing in the same direction.
Depending on the situation, you might choose to make these decisions by consensus, by a democratic vote, or by executive fiat. But no matter which approach you use, resolving to a course of action and getting everyone to buy into the same plan is often harder than leaders expect. It's not just because people resist change; in many cases, people simply have a different understanding about the details of how things will work.
Failing to have the team resolve to a course of action early on will lead to rework during the project. Someone will complete a task, only to discover that they misunderstood the requirements and will need to do it again. This rework often creates a ripple effect (or a feedback loop) which can be frustrating and demoralizing for the whole team. Of course, rework also causes overruns in budgets and schedules. In fact, research by MIT professor John Sterman and others suggests that rework is a primary contributor to many project failures.
Here's a short clip from my course "Project Management Foundations: Leading Projects" with some additional thoughts about Resolving to a course of action.
Engaging your team to create a project plan can be a powerful technique for uncovering their different perspectives, and ensuring that everyone's efforts will be fully aligned. Just listening to each team member explain the activities that they need to perform, based on what is written down in an integrated project plan, will often reveal gaps and conflicts that could cause real challenges down the road.
The sooner you identify a conflict, the easier it is to resolve it.
Done properly, developing an integrated project plan helps the entire team build a much clearer understanding of what needs to be done, by whom, and when. This is important for leaders, because this shared sense of confidence can help to ensure that your project gets off on the right foot, and that people are held accountable for their work. And it significantly reduces the risk that your project will later be sidetracked by uncertainty, confusion, or rework.
About the Author: Daniel Stanton, PMP is President of SecureMarking and Associate Professor of Operations Management at the Jack Welch Management Institute. He is also the author of "Leading Projects" and "Business Acumen for Project Managers" on LinkedIn Learning.
#LinkedInLearning #ProjectManagement #Leadership
Strategic Planning, Collaborative Service Delivery & System Integration | Data Analysis, Knowledge Development & Information Management | Passionate Public Health Student | Tech Tinkerer & Baker
7 年Thank you for this lovely piece.
Chemical Facility Security News
7 年With cyber-attacks on business becoming more and more common, perhaps we need to re-think the 'no enemies' idea (GRIN). Nice comment Mike, always the instructor.
Owner at Sweet Pea Chemical Consulting
7 年The process described is a short version of the Command Estimate (CE) process developed by the U.S. Army about 100 years ago. The CE is a mission definition, problem solving, course of action (CoA), and war-gaming process, whose goal is to develop the best course of action on which to develop the best plan. Optimally, three CoAs are developed and war-gamed, although that many may not be needed for a commercial project. The leader and the staff review all the CoAs and the leader picks the best one, sometimes with modifications. Then everyone works together to develop and execute the detailed plan. The plan includes contingency steps to minimize unknowns and rework. I should note that the CE process includes consideration of "enemy" actions. In the commercial world we don't have enemies, but we do have competitors and we must consider what they might do or the market in general might do in response to our project. The potential response may be such that we cancel the project because it will not be economically viable. I have used the CE process successfully on many projects.
Cybersecurity / Digital Defense - Marketing and Web Development Specialist - Internet Marketplace Platforms - Software Engineer
7 年Richard A. Hoberman, JD, CLF