THE FAILED FATE OF THE UN -the case for change.

THE PLEBISCITE, PALESTINE, THE PUNJAB AND PACIFIC NATIONS DISPUTES OVER TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES PROVIDE A GLOBAL CHALLENGE ASSOCIATED WITH THE FAILURE OF THE NATION-STATE.

As indigenous peoples continue to seek recognition and respect, the climate crisis continues to be mired in corporate profits, territorial colonial boundaries remain the boundaries of dispossession, pandemics prove that boundaries don't apply to global health concerns, and it's time to plan for an alternative 2050 agenda.

Our tellies tell us that India, Indonesia, Ireland and Israel remain centres of internal conflicts that date back to the failure of the nation-state solution to the representation of conflicting local communities to have their voices heard as minorities in the face of the will of the majority interests.

The fate of the United Nations (UN) and the League of Nations can be compared to the topic of the failure of the nation-state to generate peace. Both organizations were founded with the noble intention of promoting international cooperation, preventing conflicts, and maintaining global peace, but they faced different outcomes due to various factors.

The League of Nations The League was established in 1920 in the aftermath of World War I, a catastrophic conflict with millions of casualties. Its creation was seen as a reaction to the failure of the nation-state system to prevent such a devastating war.

The United Nations was formed in 1945 after World War II, another global conflict, with the aim of learning from the League's mistakes and creating a more effective international body to maintain peace. The great powers (ie the politicians of the major stakes ) created the National Security (sic) Council giving themselves a continuing veto power to protect their colonial interests.

The League of Nations had a significant number of member states, but key powers like the United States never joined or fully participated. This undermined its ability to enforce decisions. was unable to adapt to changing global dynamics and challenges. It ceased to exist as World War II erupted.

It relied heavily on moral persuasion and economic sanctions, lacking its own military force. This made it ineffective in the face of aggressive nations like Nazi Germany and militaristic Japan.

The League failed to prevent the outbreak of World War II and other conflicts during its existence, revealing the limitations of diplomacy and sanctions without the credible threat of military force.

The United Nations was formed with the support of major world powers, including the United States and the Soviet Union, which increased its global influence and capabilities. The UN has seen greater success in fostering global cooperation, especially in areas like humanitarian aid, environmental issues, and health crises, but fails to resolve religious, ethnic and territorial struggles.

Both of these representations of nationalist ideologues have proven limitations in addressing regional conflicts and maintaining peace, highlighting the complex nature of global diplomacy and the evolving role of international organisations. Both were established in response to the failures of the nation-state system to maintain peace.

While the League failed to prevent World War II and dissolved, the United Nations has faced its own challenges and limitations in addressing regional conflicts and maintaining peace, highlighting the complex nature of global diplomacy and the evolving role of the corporate state that has no place in the UN.

TIME TO ADDRESS THE REAL FOUNDATIONS OF CONFLICTS

Collaboration between Australia, ASEAN, and the World Bank could provide the necessary resources, expertise, and international credibility to launch and sustain a Congress of Communities as a global non-aligned mediation centre for indigenous and isolated minorities that could generate a global voice for peace. Some of its contributions to post-colonial performance could include:

Consensus Building: Convene discussions among key stakeholders, including representatives from indigenous and isolated minority communities, Australia, ASEAN member states, and the World Bank to build consensus on the need for and the structure of the Congress of Communities.

Legal Framework: Draft and negotiate an international treaty or agreement that establishes the legal framework for the Congress of Communities. This agreement should detail the organisation's purpose, functions, and operating principles. It could then provide a forum for the recognition and protection of the rights of indigenous and isolated minorities at the national and international levels. Engage with relevant international legal instruments, such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Funding and Resources: Seek financial support from the World Bank and other international donors to provide the initial funding needed for the establishment and operation of the Congress. Create a sustainable funding mechanism for the long term.

Location and Infrastructure: Determine the appropriate location for the Congress's headquarters. This location should be accessible and accommodating to the needs of indigenous and isolated minority communities. Develop the necessary infrastructure and facilities.

Membership and Representation: Define the criteria for community participation and representation in the Congress. Ensure a fair and inclusive process for selecting community representatives.

Governance and Decision-Making: Establish a governance structure, including a governing council or assembly, and outline the decision-making processes. Make provisions for rotating leadership roles to ensure diversity and inclusivity. It would bring together bodies like UNESCO, ILO, WHO and regional organisations to promote global peace and development efforts.

Conflict Resolution and Mediation: Develop a comprehensive framework for conflict resolution and mediation to address disputes among communities and with external entities. This should involve training and employing mediators with expertise in indigenous and minority issues.

Advocacy and Outreach: It would sponsor regular summits and conferences to facilitate dialogue among communities, governments, and organizations interested in the welfare of indigenous and isolated minorities. This could raise awareness about the mission and activities, both within and outside the indigenous and isolated minority communities. Foster partnerships with international organizations, NGOs, and academic institutions.

Research and Documentation: Foster partnerships with international organizations, NGOs, and academic institutions to support a research and documentation division to collect data, document cultural heritage, and study the challenges and opportunities facing indigenous and isolated minorities. This information can inform policy and advocacy efforts.

Education and Capacity Building: Develop a long-term sustainability plan and commit to adapting the Congress's structure and strategies to changing global dynamics and community needs based on educational programs and capacity-building initiatives to empower communities and promote cultural preservation, economic development, and peacebuilding.

?Here's a general outline of how such foundations could lodge the necessary funds with the World Bank to support the establishment of the Congress of Communities:

*Strategic Planning: Develop a clear and comprehensive philanthropic strategy that outlines the family of foundations' mission, objectives, and vision for supporting indigenous and isolated minority communities.

*Needs Assessment: Conduct a thorough needs assessment to understand the specific needs and challenges faced by these communities. Engage with community representatives and stakeholders to ensure that the funds are allocated where they are needed most.

*Collaboration with the World Bank: Establish a partnership with the World Bank or any other relevant financial institution to manage and disburse the funds. This collaboration could involve creating a trust fund or an endowment dedicated to the Congress of Communities.

*Transparency and Accountability: Establish mechanisms for transparency and accountability in fund allocation and utilization. Ensure that the funds are used in line with Congress's objectives and that financial reporting is accurate and accessible.

*Community Engagement: Involve the indigenous and isolated minority communities in the decision-making processes regarding fund allocation and project implementation to ensure their needs and priorities are addressed.

Establishing a Congress of Communities in the Asia Pacific Region, eg in Irian Jaya with Indonesian non-aligned support or Tibet with China's engagement, through a family of foundations or corporate global family-formed foundations could be a philanthropic and impactful endeavour.