Fail fast vs learn fast

Fail fast vs learn fast

I recently attended a 2 day MIT course on how to create high velocity organizations. The course was taught by Professor Steven J. Spear, author of "The High-Velocity Edge: How Market Leaders Leverage Operational Excellence to Beat the Competition." This is one of those very dense courses, full of content, but it can be summarized in one paragraph:

High-velocity organizations are able to learn very fast, especially from their failures, and to absorb that learning as an integral part of the organization's knowledge.

A high-velocity organization has 4 capabilities:

  1. Be prepared to capture knowledge and encounter problems in your operation.
  2. Understand and solve these problems to build new knowledge.
  3. Share the new knowledge with the whole organization.
  4. Leading to develop skills 1., 2. and 3.

The classic example is Toyota, with lean manufacturing and the concept of stopping production whenever failures are encountered, correcting failures and using failures as a learning opportunity so that failures do not happen anymore. This ability to learn from failures is what gives Toyota the ability to stay ahead of its competitors for so long.

Another good example is Alcoa that had a 2% work incident rate per year which was considered normal. Alcoa has more than 40,000 employees so 2% of work incidents per year means that 800 employees per year have some kind of work incident. That's a pretty impressive and troubling number. To combat this problem they implemented a policy of zero error tolerance. Prior to implementing this policy, errors was seen as part of the job. Now employees are encouraged to report operation errors in 24 hours, propose solutions in 48 hours and tell the solution found to his colleagues to ensure that knowledge was spread across the organization. This caused the risk of incidents to fall from 2% to 0.07% per year! This decreased incident rate meant less than 30 employees per year had some work incident problem after the zero error tolerance policy was implemented and Alcoa achieved an increase in productivity and quality similar to Toyota.

An important factor in both Toyota and Alcoa examples is that recognizing and learning from failures has to be part of the company's culture. This is something a bit more common in internet companies culture, but not so common in traditional companies of a certain size. During the MIT course I shared a table with a Brazilian executive, from Grupo Globo, the largest Brazilian mass media group, a Spanish executive, from a AMC Networks International (Walking Dead, Breaking Bad and Mad Men), a German project manager living in Azerbaijan who works for Swire Pacific Offshore (oil and gas industry) and a Saudi Arabian MIT postdoctoral student on solar energy. All of my table mates were from more traditional industries. I was the only one from an internet, SaaS, born in the cloud company. Both Globo and AMC executives were there because they viewed both Netflix with its streaming video on demand and Youtube with its huge catalog of user-generated video as big threats, stealing their audience very quickly and they wanted to understand how they could defend themselves.

While the theme is somewhat obvious to internet companies, specially with the technology startup culture of failing fast. That's what makes Netflix and Youtube be a threat to traditional media companies such as Grupo Globo and AMC Networks. However, even been part of internet companies' culture, sitting there and discussing it with people from more traditional companies was a great opportunity for reflection on the relationship between failure, failure recognition, learning and high-velocity:

  • Recognizing failures and using failures as a learning opportunity should be well rooted in the organization's culture. If people are not careful, as a company grows, it may lose that ability to accept failures as opportunities for learning. It is very common for companies as they grow to be more and more averse to failures and to create a culture that ultimately encourages people to hide mistakes and failures.
  • Another important point aspect learning from failures is to make this process a business standard. It has no use to fail, acknowledge the error, state that you will no longer commit that failure and, some time later, commit that failure again. This learning process from failures should be part of the company culture. Whenever a failure is identified, learning has to happen to prevent the failure from happening again. If the same failure happens again, something is broken in the learning from failure process.
  • Even in Internet companies I notice that learning from failure is more common in the product development team, since retrospectives and continuous learning are part of the agile software development culture. In other areas of the company, learning from failures is less common. This ability to systematize learning from failure should permeate the whole company.

Even though we hear a lot about the internet companies' culture of failing fast, talking about failing fast diverges our focus from what is really important, learning fast. We must put our energy on learning, not on failing. Is the learning process that makes people and companies evolve. And it is the ability of an organization to learn fast, specially from its failures, that will enable this organization to move at really high-velocities.


Luciana Borges

Sênior Growth Manager | Product Marketing | Digital Marketing - + de 9 anos de experiência testando canais de aquisi??o, ativa??o e reten??o de usuários.

6 年

Tenho percebido que a cultura de aprender com os erros e agir de forma rápida ainda é tabu em outras áreas como Marketing e CS, por exemplo, até mesmo em startups. Minha opini?o é que talvez em áreas como Produto, desenvolvimento, pelo fato de o conceito de agilidade ser algo mais latente, a equipe está mais preparada e madura para isso. A quest?o fica ainda mais complicada quando saímos do ambiente de tecnologia e startups e vamos para empresas tradicionais onde a burocracia ainda reina e a hierarquia muitas vezes mais atrapalha do que ajuda.? A cultura da empresa é o espelho do que a lideran?a acredita, por isso, ao meu ver a "culpa" ainda é dos líderes que n?o possuem skills que facilitem essa mudan?a de mindset acontecer. Muito bacana o texto :)

Dan Mark Printes

Product Executive and Entrepreneur

6 年

I couldn't agree more :) If the learning cycle is broken, the company will not evolve. So it`s very important that the learnings (not only the fails) be shared with everyone. And I think that the Product Team in each company should be the driver of this culture, where each product team share their learnings and keep the company in a continuous learning cycle by inspiring the other departments to do the same.

Miere Teixeira

Lead Software Engineer at NurtureCloud

6 年
回复
Bruno Coutinho

Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) | Strategic Leader | Speaker I Co-authorship of #1 book in Product Marketing in Brazil - "Product Marketing Essencial" is out now! ??????

6 年

Fato! Com tantas ferramentas (tradicionais e n?o) para medir feedback e eficiência de campanhas (em termos de mkt/produto), n?o tem como ficar dando murro em ponta de faca. Boa, joca!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Joaquim Torres (Joca)的更多文章

  • Os 4 princípios de desenvolvimento de produto de sucesso

    Os 4 princípios de desenvolvimento de produto de sucesso

    Como já comentei por aqui, estou escrevendo meu 4o livro, e eu adoraria ler seu comentário e opini?o sobre um tema bem…

    2 条评论
  • The 4 principles of successful product development

    The 4 principles of successful product development

    As I already mentioned here, I am writing my 4th book, and I would love to read your comments and opinion on a very…

  • Layoffs and free coaching

    Layoffs and free coaching

    I have already written about the process of analyzing and planning a layoff and also about how to see a layoff with a…

    1 条评论
  • Layoffs e mentoria gratuita

    Layoffs e mentoria gratuita

    Já escrevi sobre o processo de analisar e planejar um layoff, e também sobre como enxergar layoff com um olhar de copo…

    33 条评论
  • New book: Digital Transformation

    New book: Digital Transformation

    I have already mentioned to some people that I am working on my 4th book. The theme of this book will be Digital…

  • Novo livro: Transforma??o Digital

    Novo livro: Transforma??o Digital

    Já comentei com algumas pessoas que estou trabalhando em meu 4o livro. O tema dessa livro será Transforma??o Digital…

    3 条评论
  • Princípios antes de ferramentas e frameworks

    Princípios antes de ferramentas e frameworks

    é comum ouvir comentários de pessoas que est?o conhecendo a área de gest?o e desenvolvimento de produtos digitais e…

  • Principles before tools and frameworks

    Principles before tools and frameworks

    It is common to hear comments from people who are getting to know about digital product management and development and…

    1 条评论
  • The top-down trap

    The top-down trap

    In my last article, I've discussed the differences between problem solver teams and solution implementer teams, why…

    7 条评论
  • Problem solver vs solution implementer teams

    Problem solver vs solution implementer teams

    Marty Cagan, a well-known reference in the digital product community, wrote some time ago an interesting article about…

    13 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了