Facticity vs. Factuality: A Journey into Ontological Coaching-Part 1

Introduction to Facticity and Factuality

Have you ever found yourself stuck in a situation, feeling powerless to change it because "that's just the way things are"? Perhaps you've looked at a particular aspect of your life and thought, "This is just a fact—I have no control over it." If so, you may be grappling with what philosopher Martin Heidegger referred to as facticity. Understanding the difference between facticity and factuality can unlock new possibilities, transforming seemingly immovable barriers into opportunities for change.

Imagine waking up each day with a sense of being stuck in the same patterns—no matter what you do, it feels like nothing really changes. This feeling of being powerless often comes from what philosophers call facticity.

In this two-part series, we will explore the powerful ontological distinctions of facticity and factuality. We will look at how these concepts shape our lives and how ontological coaching uses them to help us move beyond limiting beliefs and discover new potential. In Part 2 we will deepen our understanding through the power of language to shape our reality.

Plato's Allegory of the Cave: A Frame for Understanding Facticity and Factuality

To illustrate the distinctions between facticity and factuality, consider Plato's Allegory of the Cave . In this allegory (see header image), prisoners are chained inside a dark cave, able only to see the shadows cast on the wall by objects passing in front of a fire. For these prisoners, the shadows are their reality; they mistake these shadows for the actual objects, as they have never seen the true source. This confusion is akin to how we often mistake our facticity for factuality.

In this allegory, facticity is represented by the shadows on the wall—the interpretations, assumptions, and subjective experiences that we take as reality without question. Turning around to see the real objects casting the shadows symbolises the shift from seeing our facticity to understanding factuality—recognizing the objective reality behind the shadows. The journey out of the cave and into the sunlight represents the difficult process of stepping into the clearing (a Heideggerian concept) and embracing authenticity. This journey symbolises the movement from Das Man—the societal conditioning that keeps us bound—to Dasein, where we embody our authentic potential for conscious choice.

Understanding these distinctions can help us break free from the limitations that hold us captive in our own "caves" and move towards authenticity, where we see reality more clearly and choose how to respond based on what is genuinely true rather than mere shadows.

A Personal Story

Let me tell you a personal story to help you grasp this concept. Imagine this: In my last role as a C-Suite executive, I often struggled to connect with my team. Having come from a long career as a technical specialist, my primary asset was my expertise. When I transitioned into leadership, my need to be the "expert" held me back. I thought I had to have all the answers, which led me to emphasise my knowledge over fostering collaboration. After a restructuring led me to leave that role, I began my journey as an ontological coach. Reflecting on my past, I realised that my struggle stemmed from my historical conditioning—the belief that I needed to be the smartest person in the room to be effective. I had mistaken this part of my facticity for factuality. Only when I challenged this assumption did I start to envision a different way of leading—one rooted in collaboration rather than expertise.

Another example is a coaching client of mine who struggled in her relationship. She felt trapped, believing her partner's behavior was simply "how relationships are supposed to be." Through our coaching, we explored the difference between what she believed to be true (her facticity) and what could be objectively observed (**factuality**). This distinction helped her see which parts were subjective beliefs and which were actual facts. Eventually, this opened the door to transformative conversations about her relationship—and her life.

Understanding the Distinctions of Facticity vs. Factuality

In ontological coaching, we work with distinctions that help us uncover the deeper layers of our reality. Two such distinctions are facticity and factuality.

• Facticity: This refers to the givens of our existence—aspects of our lives shaped by circumstances beyond our control. Facticity is the context we inherit: our past experiences, cultural influences, and the conditions we find ourselves thrown into. As Heidegger wrote in Being and Time, "Facticity is the character of the being of Dasein, in that it is in each case already delivered over to the 'there.'" In simpler terms, facticity is the weight of everything we bring into this moment, everything that has shaped who we are.
• Factuality: In contrast, factuality refers to objective facts—things that are verifiable and observable. Factuality is what is, without the subjective interpretations we add. Heidegger described our engagement with facts as present-at-hand: something that exists as it is, without the stories we attach to it.

Understanding these distinctions helps us identify where we limit ourselves. When we confuse facticity with factuality, we mistake our interpretations and assumptions for objective reality. By separating the two, we create space for new possibilities. Using distinct terminology like "facticity" and "factuality" encourages us to think differently, rather than falling back into generalised meanings of similar words such as facts and opinions.

Deepening the Distinctions: Dasein, Das Man, and Authenticity

To deepen our understanding, it helps to consider Heidegger’s concepts of Dasein, Das Man, and Authenticity.

• Dasein: Heidegger uses the term Dasein to describe our potential for authentic being—our capacity to make conscious choices about who we are, rather than merely reacting. Dasein represents the possibility of stepping into an authentic existence, transcending our facticity.
• Das Man: Das Man represents the they-self—the part of us that conforms to societal norms without questioning. In this mode, we live by what “they” say or expect, or mold our behaviors to feel good and fit in, rather than by our own consciously-chosen values. Das Man represents an inauthentic way of being, determined by societal conditioning rather than genuine choice.
• Authenticity: Authenticity involves accepting our facticity while making choices that are true to ourselves. It means stepping beyond the they-self (Das Man) into Dasein. Importantly, Heidegger's authenticity is not about finding an immutable “true self” but making conscious, evolving choices that align with who we wish to become.

Reflective Questions

If you were working with an ontological coach, you would encounter these distinctions in the process of ontological enquiry, but the idea of this article is to help you begin your growth journey using these distinctions. Consider these reflective questions:

1. What interpretations am I mistaking for facts?

Write down a limiting belief you hold. Is it a fact or influenced by your facticity? Another way to look at it is to ask: "What 'shadows' am I mistaking for the real world?" Just as the prisoners in Plato's cave mistook shadows for reality, what beliefs or interpretations might you be mistaking for objective truths?

2. Who am I being when I respond to these beliefs?

Are you reacting out of habit or societal expectations (**Das Man**), or are you consciously choosing a response aligned with your authentic self (**Dasein**)?

3. What possibilities open up if I see this situation differently?

Once you've separated facticity from factuality, what new actions become available? To use the Cave metaphor: "How can I step out of my 'cave' and see beyond my current interpretations?" Reflect on the journey out of the cave. What challenging but rewarding shifts could help you see beyond your current limitations?

Many clients discover that by asking these questions, they begin to see a shift—like suddenly stepping into sunlight after leaving a dark room. Let's explore these questions together.

In the next part of this series, we will dive deeper into how these distinctions can be applied in real-life situations, using Basic Linguistic Acts as practical tools to help you embody these insights.

Call to Action

Are you ready to explore the deeper layers of your existence and uncover new possibilities for growth? If this resonates, reach out for a conversation. Let’s explore how ontological coaching can help you move beyond limiting stories and step into your authentic potential. Feel free to comment below or connect with me directly.

If you’re ready to break free from the shadows and step into the sunlight of your full potential, let’s talk. Together, we’ll explore how you can redefine your reality.

Graham Smale

Ontological Coach - 2024-10-31

→ Part 2

Hashtags

#OntologicalCoaching #TransformativeChange #LeadershipDevelopment