Fact-Checking Compassionate Use: Biogen, a Mom with ALS, and what I learned on Clubhouse

The story of Lisa Stockman Mauriello and her battle for access to the investigational medicine tofersen from Biogen has been well-covered in mainstream media. The story is very personal for this LinkedIn community -- Lisa is a peer for many as a pharma communications professional most recently as a senior executive at Syneos Health. Her battle as a mother of 3 battling a recent battle with Bulbar ALS is heart-breaking. (Edit: As some have noted, Lisa is battling a particularly aggressive form of ALS (SOD1 with A5V variant) where life expectancy is less than a year, creating tremendous urgency.)

This evening on Clubhouse I learned a tremendous amount more on this issue from some fabulous voices with great expertise and perspective.

No alt text provided for this image

Some in pharma have cited concerns over the impact to a timely review of a regulatory submission by FDA and other authorities. The clinical trial participants had to meet rigid eligibility criteria, whereas those seeking compassionate use may have very different disease profiles. If they were to have an adverse event while on the medicine, will that delay the regulatory review thereby delaying access to the drug for the many other patients with the disease?

Biogen's published response also pointed out the concern about respect for those who are on the placebo in the current clinical trial that has completed enrollment. Is it not unfair for them if another patient is simply granted access? Would it discourage patients who perceive they are in the placebo arm from staying in the trial, believing they could simply withdraw from the study and apply for compassionate use?

Others note the challenge of "if we respond to one, must we respond to all". If there are 15,000 patients with ALS in the US, is it the responsibility of pharma sponsor to manufacture enough drug to supply all of the patients who request access? (Edit: In the case of Lisa's particularly rare and aggressive form of ALS, the number of patients may be in the low to mid hundreds. For such a rare disorder, does the sponsor provide compassionate use for all patients?)

Experts on this call tonight point out there have been over 10,000 compassionate use requests tracked by FDA, and that none have prevented have a medicine from reaching the market.

Some also noted that Lisa's physician happens to also be an investigator in the Biogen trial, and that she would have been eligible for the study had she not been diagnosed just after enrollment closed. Could a sponsor have extended enrollment? Are there pathways for a patient to be "randomized" within an expanded access program for equity?" (Edit: It was also noted that Lisa volunteered to be randomized, demonstrating integrity and supporting equity with those who participated in the clinical trial.)

Many cited the importance of respect for those in a placebo control arm. While some expanded access programs in the past have excluded those who were study participants that withdrew from the trial to submit for compassionate use, a key message was the importance of offering all patients access to the active drug at the end of the study.

Some called the opportunity for industry and patient groups to collaborate on best practices (or better practices) in this area. In some instances, using transparency to call out those pharma that are adhering to such better practices may be an incentive to drive awareness of better approaches and change for the future.

The conclusion seems that many are still looking to Biogen for more answers. Biogen has a long-standing commitment to the ALS patient community, and has invested tremendous resources to bring new treatments forward. As the online petition for Lisa exceeds 100,000 signatures and the #tofersen4lisa hashtag spreads, many are optimistic that other creative solutions (such as randomizing her to give a fair chance) will be given fair consideration to create a solution for Lisa and all of those battling ALS.

It is not sufficient here to "be correct while also being tremendously wrong".

Many thanks to those who helped me to learn on Clubhouse this evening: Jess Rabourn, Daniel McIntyre, Erica Bersin, Farah Ahmad, Dave deBronkart, John Neal, Marc Wilenzick, Heather Manna, Helen West, Chris Benko, and Joe Dustin.

Sharon Dilling

Helping Leaders Communicate and Connect with Clarity and Compassion | C-Suite Advisor | Storyteller | Communication Strategist | Focused on People, Purpose and Action

3 年

This is really helpful and educational information, making many of the more nuances clear. And it really makes the story all the more confusing at the same time because it reinforces the question, "Why say, 'no' to Lisa?" All of the corporate answers have been refuted. #tofersen4lisa

Xenia Freifrau von Maltzan ??

Patients. Relations. Strategist.

3 年

Thanks Craig Lipset for sharing the details discussed on Clubhouse. Such as the controversy of regulations versus real life and human need. The good part is, that the discussion started and that leads to a change in the system- step by step. #partner4patients

Mika Newton

CEO @ xCures | Pioneering AI-Powered Precision Medicine

3 年

Craig Lipset thank you for sharing. Expanded access / compassionate use is an incredibly important access mechanism for patients. It is also a rapidly emerging way to accelerate drug development as part of a comprehensive strategy. At xCures we have seen this many times in oncology as we help advanced cancer patients identify treatment options and capture comprehensive regulatory grade RWE to support approvals.

Mary Rose L.

Paralegal, Finance, Operations, Business Development

3 年

We must be able to order the treatment we need. The insurance company gate-keepers must have their powers to deny treatment taken from them. You pay health insurance every month for 20, 30, 40 years. You think you are covered, safe. Your employer withholds money from your paycheck and sends it directly to the insurance companies. Then when you or you loved one needs care the doctors deny the care or simply don't perform routine tests as part of a normal preventive appointment. What do you know? You are relying on the providers to leave no stone unturned. But I witnessed them regularly doing the bare minimum. It's a disgrace.

Gerald E. Finken

Chief Executive Officer at RxE2 Inc., Leading the way for the creation of Pharmacy Operations for clinical trials and the role of Chief Pharmacy Officer in the Pharma and Biotech industry.

3 年

Craig, Thank you so much for providing summary and sharing. I was not in attendance, but was aware of Ms. Stockman-Mauriello's plea and situation. After reading your summary and everyone's comments thus far, I had to take a few moments in silence as everything I thought important this morning, just did not matter right now. My heart and prayers go out to Lisa and all patients in need. My thoughts go out to those at Biogen who had to make this very difficult decision. If there is one thing I have learned during my tenure as a person and pharmacist is to do my best to try to understand the difficulty of the moment and not to judge in that moment because tomorrow will most likely bring a better personal understanding of why. May we all continue to work together--like this panel did--to find new pathways and solutions so that no patient or decision maker needs to be in a situation like this.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了