Fact-Checking ChatGPT: A Comparison with Divination through Chinese Cards

In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) like ChatGPT increasingly shapes our access to information, the importance of fact-checking cannot be overstated. In fact it’s easy to draw a parallel between relying on ChatGPT for information and the ancient practice of seeking answers through Chinese divination cards.? ChatGPT, much like the Chinese divination cards, offers an easy and accessible way to seek answers. Just as individuals once relied on the interpretation of cards to make sense of their circumstances, users today turn to ChatGPT for quick responses to complex questions. However, the convenience of instant answers, whether from AI or divination tools, should not be mistaken for accuracy.

ChatGPT, despite its advanced algorithms, shares a fundamental limitation with divination practices—it is not infallible. The AI is trained on vast datasets, yet these datasets can contain inaccuracies, biases, and outdated information. Similarly, divination cards offer interpretations based on symbolic meanings that are open to subjective interpretation, often reflecting the beliefs and biases of the reader.? The reliance on ChatGPT for information poses a risk of spreading misinformation, akin to the risk of basing critical decisions on the ambiguous readings of divination cards. In both cases, without proper context or understanding, the information provided can lead to misconceptions or erroneous conclusions.

This is where the critical role of fact-checking comes into play. Just as a wise user of divination cards might consult various sources or seek expert advice before making a decision, ChatGPT users must also engage in diligent fact-checking. Verifying the information provided by ChatGPT against reliable sources is essential to ensure its accuracy and relevance.? The comparison also underscores the importance of the human element in processing information. Just as interpreting divination cards requires human judgment and intuition, discerning the validity and applicability of ChatGPT’s responses necessitates human critical thinking skills. It is a reminder that technology, no matter how advanced, cannot replace the nuanced understanding and analytical abilities of the human mind.? ChatGPT represents a remarkable advancement in AI technology, it is not a substitute for critical thinking and fact-checking. Drawing a comparison with the practice of using Chinese divination cards, this essay emphasizes the need to approach AI-generated information with caution and skepticism. As we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of AI-assisted information, let us not forget the invaluable role of human judgment in discerning truth from falsehood.