EXPOSé DOSSIER: A Volatile Gold Special

Introduction This dossier outlines the systemic legal bypassing and misuse of power by Keir Starmer, both in his tenure as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and as the leader of the Labour Party. It highlights how his actions have disproportionately targeted Indigenous Britons who were later proven innocent, while he operated under a self-imposed immunity from consequences.

1. Keir Starmer’s Tenure as Director of Public Prosecutions (2008–2013) During his leadership of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), Starmer oversaw numerous legal decisions that bypassed due process and unfairly targeted individuals. Key concerns include:

• Operation Elveden & Press Persecution: Journalists were prosecuted for paying public officials, raising major concerns about press freedom and selective enforcement.
• Undercover Policing Scandals: Police infiltrated activist groups, leading to wrongful convictions. Many Indigenous Britons involved in activism were targeted under false pretenses.
• Failure in High-Profile Abuse Cases: The CPS mishandled major sexual abuse investigations, including the Jimmy Savile scandal, while aggressively pursuing weaker cases against others.

These actions indicate a pattern of strategic targeting while shielding other high-profile individuals from scrutiny.

2. Legal Bypassing and Power Abuse as Labour Leader Starmer's approach to leadership has continued this pattern of lawfare and political suppression. Notable actions include:

• Party Purges: Labour members critical of his leadership, particularly those from working-class and Indigenous British backgrounds, have been expelled without due process.
• Silencing Political Dissent: Internal Labour processes have been overridden to suppress opposition, bypassing traditional democratic structures.
• Support for Authoritarian Measures: Starmer has backed legislation expanding police powers, increasing the risk of wrongful targeting of British citizens exercising their rights.

This demonstrates an ongoing commitment to circumventing legal standards while consolidating personal political power.

3. Political & Legal Immunity Starmer’s career trajectory shows a concerning trend of escaping accountability. Factors contributing to this include:

• Legal Credentials as a Shield: His background as a barrister and former DPP grants him a veneer of legitimacy, making scrutiny more difficult.
• Institutional Backing: He has consistently received protection from political allies and media circles that dismiss concerns about his conduct.
• Lack of Investigation into Past Actions: Despite multiple instances of legal overreach, he has not faced substantial legal or political repercussions.

This pattern suggests a self-imposed immunity from the very laws he has enforced on others.

4. Violation of Universal and Tribal Laws Traditional tribal laws emphasize natural justice, fairness, and protection of the innocent. Starmer’s record violates these principles in multiple ways:

• Unjust Prosecutions: Many Indigenous Britons were prosecuted under flawed legal frameworks, later proven innocent.
• Manipulation of Legal Structures: The use of loopholes and political maneuvering contradicts the concept of universally applicable justice.
• Suppression of Ancestral Rights: His policies contribute to the erosion of civil liberties and communal protections that are foundational in indigenous legal traditions.

Conclusion & Call for Accountability Keir Starmer’s history of legal bypassing, selective prosecution, and political suppression must be examined further. There is a clear need for an independent inquiry into his tenure as DPP and his current actions as Labour leader. Justice demands accountability, particularly for those who manipulate the law while presenting themselves as its defenders.

Next Steps:

• Investigation into wrongful prosecutions under Starmer’s tenure.
• Review of Labour Party internal suppression tactics.
• Public awareness campaigns on legal overreach and political immunity.

The British public deserves transparency and justice. Starmer’s actions cannot remain unchallenged.